Healthcare practitioners’ personal and professional values

Personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners influence their clinical decisions. Understanding these values for individuals and across healthcare professions can help improve patient-centred decision-making by individual practitioners and interprofessional teams, respectively. We aimed to identify these values and integrate them into a single framework using Schwartz’s values model. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and ERIC databases for articles on personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners and students. We extracted values from included papers and synthesized them into a single framework using Schwartz’s values model. We summarised the framework within the context of healthcare practice. We identified 128 values from 50 included articles from doctors, nurses and allied health professionals. A new framework for the identified values established the following broad healthcare practitioner values, corresponding to Schwartz values (in parentheses): authority (power); capability (achievement); pleasure (hedonism); intellectual stimulation (stimulation); critical-thinking (self-direction); equality (universalism); altruism (benevolence); morality (tradition); professionalism (conformity); safety (security) and spirituality (spirituality). The most prominent values identified were altruism, equality and capability. This review identified a comprehensive set of personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners. We integrated these into a single framework derived from Schwartz’s values model. This framework can be used to assess personal and professional values of healthcare practitioners across professional groups, and can help improve practitioners’ awareness of their values so they can negotiate more patient-centred decisions. A common values framework across professional groups can support shared education strategies on values and help improve interprofessional teamwork and decision-making.     

Group cognitive behavioural therapy for first episode psychosis: who's referred,who attends and who completes it?

Aim: Most national guidelines recommend psychological therapy for people with first‐episode psychosis (FEP) but interventions proven effective in randomized control trials (RCTs) conducted in research settings do not always translate effectively to real‐world clinical environments. In a limited health system, it is important to understand the system and patient barriers to participation in effective treatment. We sought to determine what patient characteristics influenced clinicians' decision to refer or not to refer to group cognitive behavioural therapy for FEP and what characteristics were associated with those referred attending/not attending and adhering/not adhering to the programme. Methods: Between 2006 and 2008, all cases of confirmed FEP from a defined geographical region were examined using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV‐TR Axis I Disorders for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV) diagnoses, the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and Birchwood Insight Scale. Duration of untreated psychosis was established using the Beiser Scale. Results: Of the 124 (77 males, 47 females) people in the final sample, 88 (72%) were referred for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), 52 (59%) attended and 12 (23%) did not complete CBT. Those with higher levels of insight into the need for treatment (U = 740.00, z = −2.63, P = 0.008) and higher levels of positive symptoms (t (120) = −3.064, P = 0.003) were more likely to be referred to CBT. Those with higher educational attainment (χ² = 9.48, P = 0.03) and fewer negative symptoms, particularly in relation to global attention (t (85) = 2.32, P = 0.03), were more likely to attend and complete CBT. Conclusion: Within an early intervention service for FEP, it appears that individuals with less education, more negative symptoms and less insight experienced significant barriers to successfully completing group CBT. More information for referring clinicians about the benefits of CBT for FEP could help increase referral rates. Assertive outreach for people at risk of disengaging or non‐adherence should also be considered.     

Ischaemic peripheral polyneuropathy in the upper limb as a result of steal phenomenon in an arteriovenous malformation

We present the case of a 38-year-old right-hand-dominant female with a longstanding extensive high flow arteriovenous malformation (AVM) affecting the left hand and forearm. The patient’s main complaints were altered sensation in the left hand and difficulty with co-ordination. Clinical examination revealed reduced global sensibility in the hand and evidence of a vascular steal phenomenon resulting in a cold thumb and small finger without trophic changes. Subsequent nerve conduction studies identified peripheral neuropathy affecting the median, ulnar and radial nerves. There was no evidence of entrapment neuropathy and the findings were attributed to nerve ischemia as a result of the steal phenomenon. This case represents an unusual complication of an AVM of the upper limb which has not been reported previously to our knowledge. Patients with complex AVMs presenting with atypical peripheral neuropathies should be assessed for the possibility of steal phenomenon.Level of Evidence: Level V, risk/prognostic study.