How Stigma Toward Anal Sexuality Promotes Concealment and Impedes Health-Seeking Behavior in the U.S. Among Cisgender Men Who Have Sex with Men

Archives of Sexual Behavior - Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) experience alarming HIV disparities alongside sub-optimal engagement in HIV interventions. Among MSM, stigma...     

Children with Autism Experience Problems with Both Objects and People

Kanner (1943), in his classic account, described autism as a specific impairment in interpersonal relations which leaves the child's uses of objects relatively unaffected. This combination of the difficulties in relating to people and the supposedly excellent relations to objects figures centrally within many of the current theories of autism, which have had relatively little to say on the question of object use. This paper draws attention to evidence of widespread impairments in relating to objects, not only in interpersonal aspects of object use but also in early sensorimotor exploration and the functional and conventional uses of objects. In stressing these problems with objects, our purpose is not to downplay the social dimension of autism, but rather to highlight the reciprocal nature of the interactions between the child, other people, and objects. Given the evidence that other people play an important role in introducing objects to children, we propose that an impairment in interpersonal relations should itself lead us to expect corresponding disruption in the autistic child's use of objects. Conversely, an unusual use of objects is likely to manifest itself in disturbances in relating to other people, given the importance of a shared understanding and use of objects in facilitating interaction.     

Analysis of the immune response induced by a scorpion venom sub-fraction, a pure peptide and a recombinant peptide, against toxin Cn2 of Centruroides noxius Hoffmann.

Three different immunogens from the venom of the Mexican scorpion Centruroides noxius Hoffmann were used to study protective antibody response in mice and rabbits, challenged with toxin Cn2, one of the most abundant toxic peptide of this venom. The immunogens were: Cn5, a crustacean specific toxin; a recombinant protein containing the peptide Cn5 linked to the maltose transporter and a sub-fraction (F.II.5) containing 25 distinct peptides, among which is Cn5. Mice immunized with these three preparations, when directly challenged with Cn2 presented no apparent protection, whereas anti-sera produced in rabbits with these three immunogens were capable of partially neutralizing the effect of Cn2, when injected into naive mice. Cn5 rabbit anti-serum showed a better protective effect on mice, than the rabbit sera obtained against the two other antigens. The subcutaneous route of challenging mice was shown to be better than intraperitoneal injections. Comparative structural analysis of Cn5 with other toxins of this venom showed that our results are important to be taken into consideration, when choosing appropriate immunogens aimed at the production of better anti-venoms or for the rational design of possible vaccines.     

Food, health, the environment and consumers' dietary choices

The aim of this paper is to examine some of the issues that surround food and the environment, particularly conventional and organic agriculture and food distribution, and to look at some of the health implications. It is argued that the links between food, health and the environment are strong. Consumers have the power to have an impact positively or negatively on the environment via their dietary choices. By providing information and advice about the environmental as well as the health impact of food choices, health and nutrition professionals could increase consumers' awareness of such issues.     

循证病例报告 原发性脑出血患者是否应该进行抗血小板或抗凝治疗？

原发性脑出血伴有血栓危险因素的患者治疗比较棘手，如以下病例：老年男性，55岁，因右侧肢体无力入院。既往患有难治陛高血压、Ⅱ型糖尿病、心绞痛及高脂血症。约10年前右侧肢体曾有一次轻微卒中。入院时所服药物为：阿司匹林75mg，1次／日；阿托伐他汀10mg，1次／日；苄氟噻嗪2．5mg，1次／日；雷米普利2．5mg，1次／日；氨氯地平5mg，1次／日；     

Testing and implementing signal impact analysis in a regulatory setting: results of a pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Statistical signal detection methods such as proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) detect many drug safety signals when applied to databases of spontaneous suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Impact analysis is a tool that was developed as an aid to prioritisation of such signals. This paper describes a pilot project whereby impact analysis was simultaneously introduced into practice in a regulatory setting and tested in comparison with the existing approach. METHODS: Impact analysis was run on signals detected during a 26-week period from the UK Adverse Drug Reactions On-line Information Tracking (ADROIT) database of spontaneous ADRs that met minimum criteria (PRR>or=3.0, chi2>or=4.0 and >or=3 reported cases) and related to established drugs (i.e. those that have been available for at least 2 years and no longer carry the 'black triangle' symbol). The current method of signal prioritisation (i.e. the collective judgement at a weekly meeting) was initially performed without knowledge of the findings of impact analysis. Subsequently, the meeting was presented with the findings and, where appropriate, given the opportunity to reconsider the judgement made. The categories arising from the two methods were compared and the ultimate action recorded. Inter-observer variation between scientists performing impact analysis was also assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-six separate signals were analysed by impact analysis, of which 5% were categorised as high priority (A), 14% as requiring further information (B), 31% as low priority (C) and 50% as no action required (D). In general, the new method tended to give a higher level of priority to signals than the existing approach. Overall, there was 59% agreement between the impact analysis and the collective judgement at the meetings (kappa statistic=0.30). There was slightly greater agreement between impact analysis and the final action taken (kappa statistic=0.39), indicating that the findings of an impact analysis had an influence on the outcome. Assessment of inter-observer variation demonstrated that the method is repeatable (kappa statistic for overall category=0.77). Almost 70% of those who participated in the pilot study believed that impact analysis represented an improvement in how signals were prioritised. CONCLUSIONS: Impact analysis is a repeatable method of signal prioritisation that tended to give a higher level of priority to signals than the standard approach and which had an influence on the ultimate outcome.