From the Cover: Population-based screening for breast and ovarian cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2

In the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population of Israel, 11% of breast cancer and 40% of ovarian cancer are due to three inherited founder mutations in the cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. For carriers of these mutations, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces morbidity and mortality. Population screening for these mutations among AJ women may be justifiable if accurate estimates of cancer risk for mutation carriers can be obtained. We therefore undertook to determine risks of breast and ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers ascertained irrespective of personal or family history of cancer. Families harboring mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were ascertained by identifying mutation carriers among healthy AJ males recruited from health screening centers and outpatient clinics. Female relatives of the carriers were then enrolled and genotyped. Among the female relatives with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, cumulative risk of developing either breast or ovarian cancer by age 60 and 80, respectively, were 0.60 (± 0.07) and 0.83 (± 0.07) for BRCA1 carriers and 0.33 (± 0.09) and 0.76 (± 0.13) for BRCA2 carriers. Risks were higher in recent vs. earlier birth cohorts (P = 0.006). High cancer risks in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers identified through healthy males provide an evidence base for initiating a general screening program in the AJ population. General screening would identify many carriers who are not evaluated by genetic testing based on family history criteria. Such a program could serve as a model to investigate implementation and outcomes of population screening for genetic predisposition to cancer in other populations.Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 predispose to high risks of breast and ovarian cancer. Among female mutation carriers, presymptomatic surgical measures significantly reduce morbidity and mortality (1, 2). In particular, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (i.e., the removal of ovaries and fallopian tubes from a woman without ovarian cancer) reduces risk both of breast cancer and of ovarian cancer, as well as overall mortality (1). However, for many mutation carriers identified following their first cancer diagnosis, genetic testing was not previously indicated because family history did not suggest inherited cancer predisposition (3–5, 6). From a prevention perspective, it is a missed opportunity to identify a woman as a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier only after she develops cancer.Among Ashkenazi (European) Jews (AJ), three mutations, BRCA1 185delAG, BRCA1 5382insC, and BRCA2 6174delT, account for the great majority of inherited cancer risk due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 (7). In the AJ population, 2.5% of persons carry one of these three mutations (8), and the mutations account for 11% of breast cancer (3) and 40% of ovarian cancer (9, 10). These observations suggest that genetic testing in the AJ population for these mutations fulfills WHO criteria for population screening (11, 12): The disease is an important public health burden to the target population; prevalence and attributable risk of disease due to the mutations are known; and effective interventions exist. However, one necessary piece of information remains unknown: What is the disease risk to mutation carriers ascertained from the general population, rather than carriers identified based on family history (13)?Previous studies assessing cancer risks due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 ascertained carriers through high-incidence families (14), through a single index case with breast or ovarian cancer (3, 15) or through both affected and unaffected carriers (16). In a 1997 study of AJ volunteers, most index cases had no previous cancer diagnosis, but the percentage of index cases with a family history of breast cancer was approximately double that of unselected AJs (17). In principle, these strategies could have yielded risk estimates different from those of carriers ascertained from the local host population, if cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers were influenced by familial factors other than the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, such as modifier genes or shared environment (18). In addition, in almost all of these studies, risk estimates were based on imputing carrier status, rather than on direct genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2. This year, the Recommendation Statement on BRCA Testing from the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended against population screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, because cancer risk to mutation carriers in the general population was not yet known (19). To address this gap, in this study we assessed breast and ovarian cancer risks in confirmed carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations ascertained from the general population. The study was undertaken in the AJ population, because screening for only three founder mutations is sufficient to capture nearly all inherited cancer risk in this population due to BRCA1 and BRCA2 (7).     

Paternal age of schizophrenia probands and endophenotypic differences from unaffected siblings

We evaluated the discrepancy of endophenotypic performance between probands with schizophrenia and unaffected siblings by paternal age at proband birth, a possible marker for de novo mutations. Pairs of schizophrenia probands and unaffected siblings (N=220 pairs) were evaluated on 11 neuropsychological or neurophysiological endophenotypes previously identified as heritable. For each endophenotype, the sibling-minus-proband differences were transformed to standardized scores. Then for each pair, the average discrepancy was calculated from its standardized scores. We tested the hypothesis that the discrepancy is associated with paternal age, controlling for the number of endophenotypes shared between proband and his or her sibling, and proband age, which were both associated with paternal age. The non-significant association between the discrepancy and paternal age was in the opposite direction from the hypothesis. Of the 11 endophenotypes only sensori-motor dexterity was significant, but in the opposite direction. Eight other endophenotypes were also in the opposite direction, but not significant. The results did not support the hypothesized association of increased differences between sibling/proband pairs with greater paternal age. A possible explanation is that the identification of heritable endophenotypes was based on samples for which schizophrenia was attributable to inherited rather than de novo/non-inherited causes.     

Bilateral polymicrogyria associated with dystonia: A new neurogenetic syndrome?

The clinical presentation of bilateral perisylvian polymicrogyria (PMG) is highly variable, including oromotor dysfunction, epilepsy, intellectual disability, and pyramidal signs. Extrapyramidal features are extremely rare. We present four apparently unrelated patients with a unique association of PMG with dystonia. The clinical, genetic, and radiologic features are described and possible mechanisms of dystonia are discussed. All patients were female and two were born to consanguineous families. All presented with early childhood onset dystonia. Other neurologic symptoms and signs classically seen in bilateral perisylvian PMG were observed, including oromotor dysfunction and speech abnormalities ranging from dysarthria to anarthria (4/4), pyramidal signs (3/4), hypotonia (3/4), postnatal microcephaly (1/4), and seizures (1/4). Neuroimaging showed a unique pattern of bilateral PMG with an infolded cortex originating primarily from the perisylvian region in three out of four patients. Whole exome sequencing was performed in two out of four patients and did not reveal pathogenic variants in known genes for cortical malformations or movement disorders. The dystonia seen in our patients is not described in bilateral PMG and suggests an underlying mechanism of impaired connectivity within the motor network or compromised cortical inhibition. The association of bilateral PMG with dystonia in our patients may represent a new neurogenetic disorder.     

In vitro culture of testicular germ cells: regulatory factors and limitations

Spermatogenesis is regulated mainly by endocrine factors and also by testicular paracrine/autocrine growth factors. These factors are produced by Sertoli cells, germ cells, peritubular cells and interstitial cells, mainly Leydig cells and macrophages. The interactions and the ratio between Sertoli and germ cells in the seminiferous tubules ensure successful spermatogenesis. In order to culture spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) in vitro, researchers tried to overcome some of the obstacles -- such as the low number of stem cells in the testis, absence of specific markers to identify SSCs -- in addition to difficulties in keeping the SSCs alive in culture. Recently, some growth factors important for the proliferation and differentiation of SSCs were identified, such as glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), stem cell factor (SCF) and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF); also, markers for SSCs at different stages were reported. Therefore, some groups succeeded in culturing SSCs (under limitations), or more differentiated cells and even were able to produce in vitro germ cells from embryonic stem cells. Thus, success in culturing SSCs is dependent on understanding the molecular mechanisms behind self-renewal and differentiation. Culture of SSCs should be a good tool for discovering new therapeutic avenue for some infertile men or for patients undergoing chemotherapy/radiotherapy (pre-puberty or post-puberty).     

Investigations into Pulsed High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound–Enhanced Delivery: Preliminary Evidence for a Novel Mechanism

Pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) exposures without ultrasound contrast agents have been used for noninvasively enhancing the delivery of various agents to improve their therapeutic efficacy in a variety of tissue models in a nondestructive manner. Despite the versatility of these exposures, little is known about the mechanisms by which their effects are produced. In this study, pulsed-HIFU exposures were given in the calf muscle of mice, followed by the administration of a variety of fluorophores, both soluble and particulate, by local or systemic injection. In vivo imaging (whole animal and microscopic) was used to quantify observations of increased extravasation and interstitial transport of the fluorophores as a result of the exposures. Histological analysis indicated that the exposures caused some structural alterations such as enlarged gaps between muscle fiber bundles. These effects were consistent with increasing the permeability of the tissues; however, they were found to be transient and reversed themselves gradually within 72 h. Simulations of radiation force–induced displacements and the resulting local shear strain they produced were carried out to potentially explain the manner by which these effects occurred. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved with pulsed HIFU exposures for noninvasively enhancing delivery will facilitate the process for optimizing their use. (E-mail: vfrenkel@cc.nih.gov)     

Cardiac metastasis of liposarcoma

The authors describe a retroperitoneal liposarcoma with secondary involvement of the left ventricle. Therapy has been disappointing, and is guided by the nature of the primary tumor, previous therapy, extent of metastatic spread, and feasibility of cardiac resection. In selected patients whose primary tumor is well-controlled and progressing slowly, with no evidence of widespread disease, resection of the cardiac metastases can be performed when technically feasible.