PDCA循环持续改进临床用血申请审核审批

目的探讨PDCA循环法在临床用血申请审核审批过程中的应用及效果。方法应用PDCA循环法对临床用血申请审核审批进行质量持续改进,对临床用血申请审核审批不合格及未用血后疗效评估申请进行原因分析,制订相应的措施、持续改进计划。结果通过PDCA循环,临床用血申请的审核审批率由干预前的82.7%提高至99.2%,审核审批率明显提高;疗效评估率由2012年的90.3%上升至2013年的97.7%。结论采用PDCA循环能有效提高临床用血申请审核审批率和输血后疗效评估率,持续改进临床输血质量管理,促进临床科学、合理、有效用血。     

National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Preparticipation Physical Examinations and Disqualifying Conditions

Objective

To present athletic trainers with recommendations for the content and administration of the preparticipation physical examination (PPE) as well as considerations for determining safe participation in sports and identifying disqualifying conditions.

Background

Preparticipation physical examinations have been used routinely for nearly 40 years. However, considerable debate exists as to their efficacy due to the lack of standardization in the process and the lack of conformity in the information that is gathered. With the continuing rise in sports participation at all levels and the growing number of reported cases of sudden death in organized athletics, the sports medicine community should consider adopting a standardized process for conducting the PPE to protect all parties.

Recommendations

Recommendations are provided to equip the sports medicine community with the tools necessary to conduct the PPE as effectively and efficiently as possible using available scientific evidence and best practices. In addition, the recommendations will help clinicians identify those conditions that may threaten the health and safety of participants in organized sports, may require further evaluation and intervention, or may result in potential disqualification.Key Words: medical history, family history, sudden cardiac death, concussion, sickle cell trait, diabetes, heat illness, hydrationParticipation in organized US athletics continues to rise. During the 2010–2011 academic year, more than 7.6 million high school students took part in organized interscholastic sports, compared with 7.1 million in 2005–2006.¹ Similarly, an additional 444 077 National Collegiate Athletic Association student–athletes participated in intercollegiate athletics in 2010–2011, compared with 393 509 in 2005–2006.² This growth in participation has led to a concomitant rise in sudden death. Most sudden deaths have been attributed to congenital or acquired cardiovascular malformations involving male football and basketball players.^3–5 Other causes of sudden death include heat stroke, cerebral aneurysm, asthma, commotio cordis, and sickle cell trait.^4,5 As sports participation continues to increase and catastrophic death in athletes receives more attention, the medical community should consider adopting a standardized preparticipation examination (PPE) instrument that, at a minimum and to the extent possible, sets out to ensure a safe playing environment for all and to identify those conditions that might predispose an athlete to injury or sudden death.For nearly 4 decades, PPE screening has been used routinely in an attempt to identify those conditions that may place an athlete at increased risk and affect safe participation in organized sports. Few would empirically argue the potential benefits of this practice, yet considerable debate exists as to the current efficacy of the PPE, given the significant disparities that presently characterize the examination and the information gathered. Over time, the PPE has become an integral component of athletics and sports medicine programs; however, the lack of standardization in the process has created confusion. In addition, the failure to adequately define the primary objectives of the PPE has led to the consensus that, in its current form, the PPE does not address the ultimate goal of protecting the health and safety of the player.The American Medical Association Group on Science and Technology⁶ has asserted that every physician has 2 responsibilities to an athlete during the PPE: “(1) to identify those athletes who have medical conditions that place them at substantial risk for injury or sudden death and to disqualify them from participation or ensure they receive adequate medical treatment before participation and (2) to not disqualify athletes unless there is a compelling medical reason.” As the PPE has evolved over the years, it has become increasingly difficult to meet these standards given the many objectives that have been proposed for the screening instrument. Originally, the primary objectives of the PPE were to (1) detect life-threatening or disabling conditions, (2) identify those conditions that predispose the athlete to injury or disability, and (3) address legal and insurance requirements.^7,8 Today, however, those entities charged with developing and revising the PPE (eg, state high school athletic associations, medical associations, state education departments, state health departments, legislators)⁹ often have different missions, and as a result, they have sought to influence the makeup of the PPE to address their specific interests. This has led to the identification of a number of secondary objectives, including but not limited to documenting athletic eligibility, obtaining parental consent for participation and emergency treatment, and improving athlete performance.⁹ Most notably, the PPE represents the sole source of medical evaluation for 30% to 88% of children and adolescents annually^10,11 and an opportunity to identify conditions that, although not necessarily related to or requiring restriction from athletic participation, nonetheless call for additional follow-up.⁹ Some authors¹² have advocated this practice to evaluate the general health of the athlete and to provide an opening to discuss high-risk behaviors, preventive care measures, and nonathletic concerns. Others oppose this view, stating that the PPE “should not be the sole component of health care for athletes”⁶ and that the PPE can only be effective if the goals remain specific and properly directed toward the demands of sport participation.^6,13     

优化静脉溶栓流程对基层医院高级卒中中心建设的影响研究

背景　急性缺血性脑卒中（AIS）是成年人死亡和致残的主要原因之一,如何恢复是全世界的一个主要健康问题。尽管在有效预防和治疗方面取得了相当大的进展,但仍面临着重大挑战,特别是急诊处理,静脉溶栓治疗是唯一一种改善患者预后的方法,但只有少数患者能使用。目的　探讨优化静脉溶栓流程对AIS患者入院至静脉溶栓用药时间（DNT）的影响及对高级卒中中心建设的作用。方法　收集2015年11月-2018年11月海宁市人民医院收治的采用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活物（rt-PA）静脉溶栓治疗的AIS患者186例为研究对象,根据时间进行分组,2015年11月-2018年3月患者采用常规溶栓流程为常规组,2018年4-11月患者接受优化静脉溶栓流程为优化组。比较两组患者一般资料、发病至就诊时间（OTD）、入院至CT检查时间（DTI）、入院至化验检验时间（DTL）、DNT、溶栓距发病时间（TP_WINDOW）、症状性脑出血（sICH）发生率,入院时、溶栓24 h及出院时评价美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表（NIHSS）评分,以ΔNIHSS评分≥4分为有效,出院后3个月临床结局采用改良Rankin量表（mRS）评定。结果　优化组入院时NIHSS评分低于常规组（P<0.05）。常规组与优化组患者OTD、sICH发生率、有效率、出院时NIHSS评分比较,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;优化组患者DTI、DTL、DNT、TP_WINDOW、出院后3个月mRS评分低于常规组,DNT<60 min所占比例高于常规组（P<0.05）。结论　优化静脉溶栓流程可以有效缩短AIS患者DNT,并有助于DNT达标控制在60 min内,未增加溶栓出血风险且影响远期预后,值得推广。     

法律视角下我国医院伦理委员会建设中存在的问题和对策

通过系统梳理涉及伦理委员会建设的现行立法,从法律角度探讨伦理委员会的法律地位、人员组成、资质考核、操作规程、法律监督等方面存在的问题。通过剖析存在的问题,建议提高立法等级,确定性别比例和专业占比标准,参考美国伦理委员会专业认证制度加强委员资质考核;建立专门操作指南,强调跟踪审查;适当调整各方监管权限,下设专门监管机构。     

肺癌患者血浆cofilin蛋白含量检测在肺癌诊断中的应用分析

目的探讨血浆cofilin蛋白检测对诊断肺癌的价值。方法随机抽取60例肺癌患者作为实验组,80例健康体检者为对照组,检测两组血浆cofilin蛋白含量并比较。结果实验组血浆cofilin蛋白水平(0.538±0.145)ng/ml,对照组(0.187±0.132)ng/ml,实验组高于对照组(t=14.924,P=0.000);方差分析,实验组的三个临床分期的血浆cofilin蛋白水平差异有统计学意义(F=12.382,P0.05),Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期的血浆cofilin蛋白水平高于Ⅱ期(t=3.529,P=0.001;t=5.674,P=0.000),Ⅳ期高于Ⅲ期(t=2.085,P=0.045)。结论血浆cofilin蛋白的检测对诊断肺癌有重要参考价值,肺癌患者的血浆cofilin蛋白含量高于健康者,且临床分期越晚含量越高。     

7例孤立性骨浆细胞瘤的临床分析

目的 探讨孤立性骨浆细胞瘤的诊断和治疗,总结其临床特点,以提高临床诊治水平.方法 收集中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院白2007年4月至2011年6月收治7例孤立性骨浆细胞瘤患者的临床资料并对其临床特点、诊断标准及治疗和预后作一回顾性分析.结果 所有病例均经病理证实为骨浆细胞瘤并符合孤立性骨浆细胞瘤的诊断标准,其中1例伴POEMS综合征(多神经病、器官巨大症、内分泌病、M蛋白和皮肤病变综合征),1例术后6个月出现多处骨转移.所有患者治疗后随访1~13个月,平均随访时间为4个月.其中5例患者预后良好,随访期间未出现病情进展.结论 孤立性骨浆细胞瘤好发于中老年,是少见的低度恶性肿瘤.主要依靠病理确诊,手术结合适当剂量的放疗是其治疗的最佳手段.     

Influence of ATP-Binding Cassette Polymorphisms on Neurological Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury

Background

As important mediators of solute transport at the blood–brain and blood–cerebrospinal fluid barriers, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (including ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCC2), impact the bioavailability of drugs and endogenous substrates in the brain. While several ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCC2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified, their impact on outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unknown.

Hypothesis

ABCB1, ABCC1, and ABCC2 SNPs are associated with Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score after TBI.

Methods

DNA samples from 305 adult patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS score ≤ 8) were genotyped for tagging SNPs of ABCB1 (rs1045642; rs1128503), ABCC1 (rs212093; rs35621; rs4148382), and ABCC2 (rs2273697). For each SNP, patients were dichotomized based on presence of variant allele for multivariate analysis to determine associations with GOS assigned at 6 months adjusting for GCS, Injury Severity score, age, and patient sex.

Results

For ABCB1 rs1045642, patients homozygous for the T allele were less likely to be assigned poor outcome versus those possessing the C allele [CT/CC; odds of unfavorable GOS = 0.71(0.55–0.92)]. For ABCC1 rs4148382, patients homozygous for the G allele were less likely to be assigned poor outcome versus those possessing the A allele [AG/AA; odds of unfavorable GOS = 0.73(0.55–0.98)].

Conclusions

In this single-center study, patients homozygous for the T allele of ABCB1 rs1045642 or the G allele of ABCC1 rs4148382 were found to have better outcome after severe TBI. Further study is necessary to replicate these very preliminary findings and to determine whether these associations are due to central nervous system bioavailability of ABC transporter drug substrates commonly used in the management of TBI, brain efflux of endogenous solutes, or both.     

Oct-2、Bob.1在肺结核组织B细胞中的表达及其意义

目的探讨肺结核组织B细胞中Oct-2、Bob.1的表达与机体免疫的关系。方法采用免疫组织化学检测20例肺结核组织B细胞中Oct-2、Bob.1的表达情况。结果 (1)在肺结核组织生发中心的B细胞中Oct-2和Bob.1主要表达在细胞核;在无形成生发中心聚集的B细胞中,细胞核和细胞浆均呈阳性;(2)肺结核组织B细胞中Oct-2阳性的细胞数明显少于Bob.1阳性的细胞数,Oct-2和Bob.1阳性率分别为:10.8%、65.6%;(3)形成生发中心的肺结核组织B细胞中Oct-2和Bob.1阳性的细胞数明显高于无生发中心形成的肺结核组织,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肺结核组织B细胞Oct-2表达低下和/或Oct-2、Bob.1表达不一致可能导致B细胞在发育过程中未能形成生发中心。     

异位中肾管囊肿合并异位睾丸恶变1例报告并文献复习

目的:报告1例罕见异位中肾管囊肿合并异位睾丸恶变病例,提高对本病的诊治水平。方法:回顾分析异位中肾管囊肿合并异位睾丸恶变的病例的临床资料,结合国内外相关文献,探讨异位中肾管囊肿合并异位睾丸恶变的发病机制、诊断及治疗。结果:经腹切除巨大囊肿及右侧异位恶变睾丸,左侧隐睾行下降固定,病理示"右异位中肾管囊肿,右侧异位睾丸精原细胞瘤",随访1年无转移。结论:异位中肾管囊肿合并异位睾丸恶变极为罕见,影像学检查可协助诊断,但最终需病理确诊,应早期行手术切除。后续治疗取决于隐睾恶变的病理类型及分期。