Intra-lesional injections of collagenase are ineffective in the treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars.

The treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars remains difficult. Enzymatic digestion of keloid scars has been previously proposed as an effective treatment strategy for reducing the volume of keloid scars. To test this, we administered intra-lesional injections of pure collagenase (between 600 and 4500 units for each scar) into the keloid and hypertrophic scars of seven human volunteers (five keloid and two hypertrophic scars). Five patients (three keloid and two hypertrophic) received more than one injection of collagenase. The treatment resulted in a temporary reduction in scar volume for three of the patients with keloid scars. However, scar volumes for these three patients returned to the same (or greater) levels after 6 months of follow-up. Treatment with collagenase produced no change in scar volume for the two patients with hypertrophic scar. Side effects were numerous and severe including; pain, swelling, blistering, ulceration and ecchymosis at the site of injection. One patient required admission to hospital for 48 h after the first injection. Maximum length of follow-up was 6 months. None of the seven patients completed the study and returned for final follow-up at 2 years. This pilot study suggests that treatment of keloid and hypertrophic scars with intra-lesional injections of collagenase is ineffective.     

Living-related donor transplants should be performed with caution in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

The success rates of living-related donor (LRD) transplants are clearly superior to those obtained with cadaver donors. However, caution should be exercised when considering LRD transplantation for a condition which has an increased chance of recurring after transplantation and causing ultimate graft failure. The recurrence rate of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in the allograft is 20%–40%, with graft failure resulting in 40%–50% of these cases. However, these figures may be an underestimation of the true rate of recurrence of FSGS. Once a first transplant fails due to recurrent disease, the risk of recurrence in the second transplant approaches 80%. Subgroups of patients at high risk for recurrence have been identified. In patients not at high risk for recurrent FSGS, the use of a LRD should be considered, provided that the donor and recipient and their families have been informed that the disease may recur and lead to graft failure. In patients at high risk for recurrence, a LRD transplant should be avoided. Hopefully, future development of a simple and reliable test to predict the likelihood of recurrence will enable us to counsel and advise our patients with FSGS about the wisdom or dangers of proceeding with a LRD transplant.