Assessing the comparability of standardized patient and physician evaluations of clinical skills

Accumulating evidence to defend decisions based on scores from evaluations is an ongoing process. The purpose of this investigation was to gather additional data to support the validity of inferences made from scores on the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates' Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA). This was accomplished by contrasting CSA candidate scores, and pass/fail decisions, with those obtained from the American Board of Internal Medicine's Mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise). Data gathering performance based on the number of unweighted history taking and physical examination checklist items adequately predicted the global ratings provided by physician observers. CSA ratings of doctor-patient communication skills correlated with mini-CEX ratings of like constructs, indicating that physician observers, using mini-CEX rating scales, are able to make realistic assessments of interpersonal skills. These results provide evidence of the convergent validity of CSA scores.     

Nurses' perceived barriers to the implementation of a Fall Prevention Clinical Practice Guideline in Singapore hospitals

Background  

Theories of behavior change indicate that an analysis of barriers to change is helpful when trying to influence professional practice. The aim of this study was to assess the perceived barriers to practice change by eliciting nurses' opinions with regard to barriers to, and facilitators of, implementation of a Fall Prevention clinical practice guideline in five acute care hospitals in Singapore.     

A simulation-based acute skills performance assessment for anesthesia training

In an earlier study, trained raters provided reliable scores for a simulation-based anesthesia acute care skill assessment. In this study, we used this acute care skill evaluation to measure the performance of student nurse anesthetists and resident physician trainees. The performance of these trainees was analyzed to provide data about acute care skill acquisition during training. Group comparisons provided information about the validity of the simulated exercises. A set of six simulation-based acute care exercises was used to evaluate 43 anesthesia trainees (28 residents [12 junior and 16 senior] and 15 student nurse anesthetists). Six raters scored the participants on each exercise using either a detailed checklist, key-action items, or a global rating. Trainees with the most education and clinical experience (i.e., senior residents) received higher scores on the simulation scenarios, providing some evidence to support the validity of the multi-scenario assessment. Trainees varied markedly in ability depending on the content of the exercise. In general, anesthesia providers demonstrated similar aptitude in managing each of the six simulated events. Most participants effectively managed ventricular tachycardia, but postoperative events such as anaphylaxis and stroke were more difficult for all trainees to promptly recognize and treat. Training programs could use a simulation-based multiple encounter evaluation to measure provider skill in acute care. IMPLICATIONS: A trainee's skill in managing critical events can be assessed using a multiple scenario simulation-based performance evaluation.