Complicated pancreatic abscesses: problems in interventional management

Twenty-five patients with grade D or E pancreatitis underwent percutaneous drainage. These patients required multiple computed tomography (CT) examinations, multiple catheter insertions, multiple catheter manipulations, and long-term catheter drainage. Eight of the 25 patients were successfully treated with catheter drainage alone. Sixteen underwent surgical drainage, ten after attempts at percutaneous drainage and six prior to radiologic drainage. Of the ten patients who had initial percutaneous drainage, only four were clinically improved from the drainage procedure alone. Although the fluid component of the abscess was often adequately drained in all ten patients, surgery was required to remove pieces of necrotic debris. Six patients who underwent surgical debridement had residual abscesses in the post-operative period and were all successfully treated with percutaneous drainage. One patient died from unrelated causes. Successful interventional management of patients with pancreatic abscesses requires intensive radiologic intervention and monitoring and may be better served by a combination of radiologic and surgical means.     

Laboratory standardizatin in an international study: the Kaunas--Rotterdam intervention study (KRIS).

Laboratory results obtained in different laboratories over lengthy periods of time usually are difficult to compare. In cooperative long-term studies where such results must be pooled, thorough standardization of methods is vital. We describe a program in which comparable plasma cholesterol and glucose analyses have been obtained, by simple methods. In the Netherlands and the Soviet Union in close collaboration with the Center for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga., U.S.A. The two laboratories produced glucose values (direct o-toluidine reaction) within 2% of the target reference values and cholesterol results (direct Liebermann-Burchard reaction) with a consistent 6-8% positive bias over the reference method values. Intralaboratory precision was subject to preset acceptance limits. The use of common control materials, exchange of patient samples, and on-site comparison of all details of laboratory procedures are vital tools in standardization efforts. A laboratory protocol that included quality requirements and rejection criteria was developed and proved to be indispensable. The experience gained should be useful in standardizing inter-laboratory results in similar studies.     

General practitioners' satisfaction with and attitudes to out-of-hours services

Background  

In recent years, Dutch general practitioner (GP) out-of-hours service has been reorganised into large-scale GP cooperatives. Until now little is known about GPs' experiences with working at these cooperatives for out-of-hours care. The purpose of this study is to gain insight into GPs' satisfaction with working at GP cooperatives for out-of-hours care in separated and integrated cooperatives.     

What is important in evaluating health care quality? An international comparison of user views

Background  

Quality of care from the perspective of users is increasingly used in evaluating health care performance. Going beyond satisfaction studies, quality of care from the users' perspective is conceptualised in two dimensions: the importance users attach to aspects of care and their actual experience with these aspects. It is well established that health care systems differ in performance. The question in this article is whether there are also differences in what people in different health care systems view as important aspects of health care quality. The aim is to describe and explain international differences in the importance that health care users attach to different aspects of health care.