Sphingosine-1-phosphate facilitates trafficking of hematopoietic stem cells and their mobilization by CXCR4 antagonists in mice

CXCL12 and VCAM1 retain hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the BM, but the factors mediating HSC egress from the BM to the blood are not known. The sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P(1)) is expressed on HSCs, and S1P facilitates the egress of committed hematopoietic progenitors from the BM into the blood. In the present study, we show that both the S1P gradient between the BM and the blood and the expression of S1P(1) are essential for optimal HSC mobilization by CXCR4 antagonists, including AMD3100, and for the trafficking of HSCs during steady-state hematopoiesis. We also demonstrate that the S1P(1) agonist SEW2871 increases AMD3100-induced HSC and progenitor cell mobilization. These results suggest that the combination of a CXCR4 antagonist and a S1P(1) agonist may prove to be sufficient for mobilizing HSCs in normal donors for transplantation purposes, potentially providing a single mobilization procedure and eliminating the need to expose normal donors to G-CSF with its associated side effects.     

Chronic graft-versus-host disease in 52 patients: adverse natural course and successful treatment with combination immunosuppression

Fifty-two of 175 (30%) survivors of allogeneic marrow transplantation developed chronic graft-versus-hose diseases (GVHD). Five with limited chronic GVHD had an indolent clinical course with involvement of only the skin and liver. Forty-seven with extensive chronic GVHD had an unfavorable multiorgan disorder that resembled several autoimmune diseases. Thirteen patients with extensive disease (group I) were not treated and only 2 survive with Karnofsky scores >- 70%. Mortality resulted from infections and morbidity from sica syndrome, pulmonary and hepatic insufficiency, scleroderma-like skin disease, and contractures. Another 13 (group II) received a median of 8 mo prednisone and/or a brief course of antithymocyte globulin, and 3 survive without disability. The other 21 (group III) were treated with a combination of prednisone (1.0 mg/kg/q.o.d.) and either cyclophosphamide, procarbazine, or azathioprine (all 1.5 mg/kg/day) for a median of 13 mo. Combination therapy was well tolerated with only modest myelotoxicity. Fifteen in group III had a good and 4 a fair response to treatment while 2 with no response died. Azathioprine and prednisone was the most effective regimen. All therapy has been discontinued in 12 group III patients: GVHD returned in 5 (including 2 who died in spite of retreatment) while 7 remain free of GVHD for a median of 11 (range 6-30) mo observation. Only I group III survivor is disabled and 16 of the original 21 are alive 2-4 yr after transplant with Karnofsky scores of 70%-100%. Thus, combination immmunosuppression appears to favorably affect and, in some cases, premanently arrest the adverse natural course of extensive chronic GVHD.     

Marrow transplantation with or without donor buffy coat cells for 65 transfused aplastic anemia patients

Sixty-five multiply transfused patients with severe aplastic anemia were given cyclophosphamide followed by grafts anemia were given cyclophosphamide followed by grafts from HLA-identical siblings. The effect of the administration of viable donor buffy coat cells following the marrow inoculum was evaluated with regard to graft rejection and survival. Results in 43 patients so treated are presented along with those in 22 concurrent patients given marrow alone. Most patients given buffy coat had positive in vitro tests of sensitization indicating a high risk for graft rejection, while all but one of the patients given marrow alone had negative tests. Thirty of the 43 (70%) patients given marrow and buffy coat are alive between 10 and 61 mo (median 36) after grafting; 4 died after graft rejection and 6 with acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Eleven of the 22 (50%) patients given marrow alone are alive between 29 and 65 mo (median 52); 7 died after graft rejection and 3 with GVHD. The addition of buffy coat cell infusions to the marrow inoculum reduced the risk of rejection and increased survival in the currently reported transfused patients when compared to patients grafted before 1976. However, there was an increased risk of chronic GVHD. Recipients of marrow from female donors survived slightly better (73%) than recipients of male marrow (58%).     

α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的系统评价

目的评价α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病患者的效果。方法检索Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CurrentContents、LILACS在研试验数据库,主题为α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂的综述的参考文献,并联系纳入试验的专家与实施者。最近检索日期为2003年月12月(CurrentContents)和2003年4月(其他数据库)。纳入α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂单一疗法与其它干预比较,治疗2型糖尿病疗程至少12周的随机对照试验,并且试验至少包括以下结局之一:病死率、患病率、生活质量、血糖控制、血脂、胰岛素水平、体重、不良事件。两名评价者独立阅读所有摘要,评价质量并提取数据,分歧通过协商解决或由第三位评价者裁决。由一位统计学家在对提取数据输入数据库时进行检查。我们尽量联系所有作者以核实数据。结果共纳入41个试验、8130例受试者,其中30个针对阿卡波糖,7个针对米格列醇,1个针对优格列波糖,还有3个为不同α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂间的比较。绝大多数研究疗程为24周,仅有2个研究超过1年。与安慰剂相比,阿卡波糖血糖控制效果更好:糖化血红蛋白–0.8%[95%CI(–0.9,–0.7)],空腹血糖–1.1mmol/L[95%CI(–1.4,–0.9)],负荷血糖–2.3mmol/L[95%CI(–2.7,–1.9)],阿卡波糖对糖化血红蛋白的作用呈非剂量依赖。我们发现其可降低负荷胰岛素,但对血脂和体重未见临床相关的作用。不良反应主要来自胃肠道且与剂量相关。相对于磺脲,阿卡波糖将空腹和负荷胰岛素水平分别降低至–24.8pmol/L[95%CI(–43.3,–6.3)]和–133.2pmol/L[95%CI(–184.5,–81.8)],但阿卡波糖引起的不良反应更多。结论关于α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂是否影响2型糖尿病患者的病死率和患病率仍不清楚。相反,其对血糖控制或胰岛素水平作用明显,对血脂和体重的作用差异无统计学意义。α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂更长疗程的效果仍不确定。阿卡波糖剂量超过50mg(TID)时不能进一步影响糖化血红蛋白水平,不良反应反而更多,与磺脲相比,α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂降低了空腹和负荷胰岛素水平,但在血糖控制和不良反应方面存在不利影响。     

Validity of self reported occupational exposures to hand transmitted and whole body vibration

OBJECTIVES—To assess the accuracy with which workers report their exposure to occupational sources of hand transmitted (HTV) and whole body vibration (WBV).
METHODS—179 Workers from various jobs involving exposure to HTV or WBV completed a self administered questionnaire about sources of occupational exposure to vibration in the past week. They were then observed at work over 1 hour, after which they completed a second questionnaire concerning their exposures during this observation period. The feasibility of reported sources of exposure during the past week was examined by questioning managers and by inspection of tools and machines in the workplace. The accuracy of reported sources and durations of exposure in the 1 hour period were assessed relative to what had been observed.
RESULTS—The feasibility of exposure in the previous week was confirmed for 97% of subjects who reported exposure to HTV, and for 93% of subjects who reported exposure to WBV. The individual sources of exposure reported were generally plausible, but occupational use of cars was substantially overreported, possibly because of confusion with their use in travel to and from work. The accuracy of exposures reported during the observation period was generally high, but some sources of HTV were confused—for example, nailing and stapling guns reported as riveting hammers, and hammer drills not distinguished from other sorts of drill. Workers overestimated their duration of exposure to HTV by a median factor of 2.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.6-5.9), but estimated durations of exposure were more accurate when the exposure was relatively continuous rather than for intermittent short periods. Reported durations of exposure to WBV were generally accurate (median ratio of reported to observed time 1.1, IQR 1.0-1.2).
CONCLUSIONS—Sources of recent occupational exposure to vibration seem to be reported with reasonable accuracy, but durations of exposure to HTV are systematically overestimated, particularly when the exposure is intermittent and for short periods. This raises the possibility that dose-response relations may have been biased in some of the studies on which exposure standards might be based, and that the levels in currently proposed standards may be too high. Future studies should pay attention to this source of error during data collection.


Keywords: vibration; exposure; assessment; validity