Przedtransplantacyjne czynniki ryzyka reaktywacji zakażenia wirusem cytomegalii po przeszczepieniach allogenicznych komórek hematopoetycznych u dzieci i młodych dorosłych

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains one of the most frequent complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).MethodsAn analysis of the pre-transplant risk factors of CMV reactivation was performed in 98 patients aged 0.5–22 years (median 10.5) undergoing allogeneic HSCT. CMV reactivation was tested by assessing viral load using PCR method. Following factors were analyzed: type of conditioning, graft source, donor type, use of T-depletion and CMV-serostatus of the donor and recipient. Each factor was assigned from 0 to 2 points. Based on total score for each patient, CMV reactivation risk scale was developed, and two groups with low (LR) and high (HR) risk were determined.ResultsCMV reactivation was seen in 25 patients (24.5%). The significant risk factors for CMV reactivation were: CMV-positive recipient (p<0.001), unrelated donor (p<0.002), use of ATG (p<0.002) and PBSC (p<0,01). In the HR group the incidence of reactivation CMV was significantly higher than in LR group (47.8% vs. 5.4%, p<0.001).ConclusionsCMV seropositivity of the recipient was an independent predictor factor of CMV reactivation. The use of risk point scale of CMV reactivation allows for identification of patients with the higher risk of CMV reactivation.     

Suicide by intoxication with iron (III) chloride

Forensic Toxicology - Cases of iron intoxication are not very often encountered in toxicology practice, and most of those reported concern accidental intoxications with iron supplements in young...     

Early epileptic seizures in ischaemic stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy: influence of rt-PA

Journal of Neurology - The epileptogenicity of recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator (rt-PA) has been suggested, but seizures were not evaluated in randomised controlled trials. To evaluate...     

Exploring caregiver understanding of medications immediately after a pediatric primary care visit

Objective

Assess accuracy of caregiver understanding of children's prescribed medications and examine factors associated with accurate recall.

Methods

Cross-sectional, observational study of English- or Spanish-speaking caregivers of primary care patients aged 0–7 years. Child and visit characteristics and caregiver health literacy (Short Test of Health Literacy in Adults) were assessed. Post-visit, caregivers completed questionnaires on medications prescribed. Caregiver and medical record agreement on medication name and administration (dose and frequency) were examined using chi square and logistic regression.

Results

Analyses included 68 caregivers (28% low health literacy); 96% of children had public insurance. Caregivers indicated that the doctor provided clear medication information (100%) and they could follow instructions (98%). 101 medicines were prescribed; 6 were recalled by caregiver only. 71% of medications were accurately named; 37% of administration instructions were accurately recalled. Accurate naming was more often found for patients 3–7 years, without conditions requiring repeat visits, and new medications. Accurate administration responses were associated with having only 1 child at the visit.

Conclusion

Unperceived medication instruction understanding gaps exist at physician visits for caregivers of all literacy levels. Communication and care delivery practices need further evaluation.

Practice implications

Clinicians should be aware of the frequency of caregiver medication misunderstanding.     

Are GP patients’ needs being met? Unfulfilled information needs among native-Dutch and Turkish-Dutch patients

Objective

This study aims to assess unfulfilled information needs of native-Dutch and Turkish-Dutch general practitioner (GP) patients in the Netherlands. In addition, the relation between perceived and recorded information provision by GPs is studied.

Methods

Unfulfilled information needs of native-Dutch (N = 117) and Turkish-Dutch patients (N = 74) were assessed through pre- and post-consultation questionnaires. Audiotapes of GP consultations were made to code GPs’ information provision.

Results

Turkish-Dutch patients experience more unfulfilled information needs than native-Dutch patients, in particular those who identify equally with Dutch and Turkish culture. Overall, perceived information provision is hardly related to recorded information provision.

Conclusion

GPs insufficiently provide Turkish-Dutch patients and, to a lesser extent, native-Dutch patients as well, the information they need.

Practice implications

GPs should be trained in giving adequate, tailored information to patients with various ethnic and cultural backgrounds.