社区及医院感染中产β-内酰胺酶的大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌细菌耐药性及质粒分析

目的探讨社区和医院感染中产ESBLs的大肠埃希菌(ECO)和肺炎克雷伯菌(KPN)耐药性及细菌质粒谱特点. 方法药敏试验采用改良Kirby-Bauer法,细菌质粒DNA采用碱变性少量快速提取法,用χ2检测. 结果医院感染ECO耐药率明显高于社区感染(P＜0.001),ECO细菌质粒较KPN分子量大,表现多源性、多样性、分布较广,仅在ECO中发现3对同源基因质粒谱. 结论医院感染致病ECO有多源多样的细菌耐药质粒,为医院感染顽固的耐药菌,应加强医院感染易感因素控制,以防感染流行.     

GBE1基因突变型糖原累积病Ⅳ型1例报告

目的探讨GBE1基因突变的糖原累积病Ⅳ型(GSD Ⅳ)患儿的临床特点及其家系的基因突变情况。方法分析1例GSD Ⅳ患儿的临床表现、肝脏病理结果及其父母的全外显子基因测序情况,并进行文献复习。结果患儿,男,1岁10个月,肝脾肿大6月余伴发热7天;肝脏组织病理示慢性肝损伤,不能除外遗传代谢病。全基因外显子检测示患儿存在2种新的GBE1基因的杂合突变,分别为来自父亲的c.1694GA杂合突变(致病性变异)和来自母亲的c.218AG杂合突变(疑似致病性变异)。结合患儿临床表现、病理及基因检测结果确诊为肝型GSD Ⅳ。结论新发现GEB 1基因c. 1694 GA的致病性杂合突变,丰富了GSD Ⅳ型在中国人群的突变谱。     

Systematic review of the outcome associated with the different surgical treatment of bowel and rectovaginal endometriosis

Background: Treatment of deep endometriosis involving the bowel is controversial. There is limitation of medical treatment. Several surgical techniques are used. All of them are associated with potential intraoperative complications and long-term hazards for the bladder, bowel and sexual function. Objectives: This study seeks to review systematically different types of surgical treatment of bowel endometriosis which include mucosal skinning (shaving), disc excision, and segmental resection. The review includes the number of participants, histology, symptomatology, preoperative assessment, types and access of surgery, complications, hospital stay, length and way of follow up, symptom improvement, recurrence, and effects on fertility. Study strategy: All published articles on surgical treatment of endometriosis (shaving, rectovaginal endometriosis, disc excision, and segmental resection), identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochran library during 1970–2011. Grey literatures were searched as well. Selection criteria: The terms ‘endometriosis’, ‘bowel’, surgical, and complications were used. Articles describing 50 patients or more who had bowel surgery for endometriosis were only included. Data collection and analysis: Data did not permit a meaningful meta-analysis. Main results: We analyzed 36 articles after thorough literature search. It described 2,414 of mucosal skinning/rectovaginal endometriosis, 381 of disc excision, and 2,728 of bowel resection for deep endometriosis involving the bowel. The indication for surgery was stated in most of the studies. Histology was confirmed in the majority; however, completeness of the excision was stated in few articles. There is significant improvement of symptoms with all types of surgery. Complications were higher in segmental resection than conservative surgery (shaving and disc excision) especially leakage and fistula formation. The duration of surgery and hospital stay was shorter in conservative surgery unless there were complications or if associated with other surgeries. Fertility outcome was favourable in all. The recurrence and reoperation rate was higher in one study only in the shaving group, but otherwise was comparable to the resection group. Conclusion: There was no difference in the outcome between different types of surgery which indicates that we should adopt the conservative surgery if possible. The heterogeneity of the studies makes it difficult to do any valuable statistical analysis. There should be standardization in clinical trials evaluating bowel surgery for endometriosis.