High sensitivity cardiac troponin T and interleukin‐6 predict adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation

Summary. There are limited data on the prognostic role of biomarkers in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the prognostic value of high sensitivity TnT (hsTnT) and high‐sensitivity interleukin‐6 (hsIL6) in a large cohort of AF patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy (OAC) as both biomarkers have been associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Methods: We studied 930 patients (51% male; median age 76) with permanent/ paroxysmal AF who were stabilized (for at least 6 months) on OAC (INRs 2.0–3.0). Plasma hsTnT and hsIL6 levels were quantified by electrochemiluminescense immunoassay at baseline. Patients were followed‐up for up to 2 years, and adverse events (thrombotic and vascular events, mortality and major bleeding) were recorded. Results: At follow‐up, 96 patients (3.97%/year) died whilst 107 had an adverse cardiovascular event (3.14%/year). On multivariate analysis, high hsTnT and high hsIL6 remained significantly associated with prognosis even after adjusting for CHADS₂ score: HR 2.21 (1.46–3.35, P < 0.001) for high hsTnT and 1.97 (1.29–3.02, P = 0.002) for high hsIL6, for adverse cardiovascular events. For all‐cause mortality, the HRs were 1.79 (1.13–2.83, P = 0.013) and 2.48 (1.60–3.85, P < 0.001), respectively. The integrated discrimination index (IDI) values of clinical scores (CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂‐VASc) were improved by the addition of hsTnT and/or hsIL6 (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: In a large ‘real world’ cohort of anticoagulated AF patients, both hsTnT and hsIL6 levels provided prognostic information that was complementary to clinical risk scores for prediction of long‐term cardiovascular events and death, suggesting that these biomarkers may potentially be used to refine clinical risk stratification in AF.     

Type II antithrombin deficiency caused by a large in‐frame insertion: structural,functional and pathological relevance

Summary. Background: The metastable native conformation of serpins is required for their protease inhibition mechanism, but also renders them vulnerable to missense mutations that promote protein misfolding with pathological consequences. Objective: To characterize the first antithrombin deficiency caused by a large in‐frame insertion. Patients/Methods: Functional, biochemical and molecular analysis of the proband and relatives was performed. Recombinant antithrombin was expressed in HEK‐EBNA cells. Plasma and recombinant antithrombins were purified and sequenced by Edman degradation. The stability was evaluated by calorimetry. Reactive centre loop (RCL) exposure was determined by thrombin cleavage. Mutant antithrombin was crystallized as a dimer with latent plasma antithrombin. Results: The patient, with a spontaneous pulmonary embolism, belongs to a family with significant thrombotic history. We identified a complex heterozygous in‐frame insertion of 24 bp in SERPINC1, affecting strand 3 of β‐sheet A, a region highly conserved in serpins. Surprisingly, the insertion resulted in a type II antithrombin deficiency with heparin binding defect. The mutant antithrombin, with a molecular weight of 59 kDa, had a proteolytic cleavage at W49 but maintained the N‐terminal disulphide bonds, and was conformationally sensitive. The variant was non‐inhibitory. Analysis of the crystal structure of the hyperstable recombinant protein showed that the inserted sequence annealed into β‐sheet A as the fourth strand, and maintained a native RCL. Conclusions: This is the first case of a large in frame‐insertion that allows correct folding, glycosylation, and secretion of a serpin, resulting in a conformationally sensitive non‐inhibitory variant, which acquires a hyperstable conformation with a native RCL.     

Análisis del polimorfismo rs20541 (R130Q) del gen de la IL-13 en pacientes con enfermedades inflamatorias crónicas asociadas al envejecimiento

ObjectiveTo investigate whether there is association between the rs20541 (R130Q) polymorphism in the IL-13 gene with disease susceptibility and clinical subsets in patients with elderly-associated inflammatory chronic diseases.Material and methods78 patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), 174 with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), 90 elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA), and 465 healthy controls from the same geographic area were studied. The rs20541 (R130Q) polymorphism in the IL-13 gene was evaluated by PCR-RFLP. Circulating levels of IL-13 were measured by ELISA.ResultsA higher frequency of the AA genotype [2.349 (0.994-5.554)], as well as the allele A [1.589 (1.085-2.328] and the A carriers [1.656 (1.021-2.686)] (p < 0.05) was observed in the GCA patients. No significant differences were observed in the PMR and EORA patients as compared with the healthy controls. Neither difference was observed among the different disease groups studied. In GCA patients, differences in the genotype were associated with a worse prognosis. In PMR patients, the AA genotype was associated with higher levels of serum IL-13 than the GA one. However, such an association was not detected for controls and the other disease groups.ConclusionsGCA is more frequent in carriers of the rs20541 (R130Q) polymorphism in the IL-13 gene. The utility of this polymorphism to predict the GCA prognosis must be confirmed in studies with a higher number of patients.     

Cost‐utility analysis of idelalisib in combination with rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Objective

To evaluate the incremental cost‐utility ratio (ICUR) of idelalisib in combination with rituximab (IR) versus rituximab monotherapy (R) in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.

Methods

A partitioned survival Markov model for a lifetime horizon (30 years) was developed to estimate costs (€, 2016) and quality‐adjusted life years (QALY) with IR and R. Initial cohort included patients with CLL receiving a second or subsequent line (2L) of treatment with IR or R. Survival data were based on CLL clinical trial. Drug, administration, monitoring, adverse events and clinical management of CLL costs were included in the model. Costs and outcomes were discounted using a 3% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed.

Results

Compared to R, 2L IR treatment resulted in QALY gain of 3.147 (4.965 versus 1.818). Total costs were €118 254 for IR versus €23 874 for R. ICUR was €29 990/QALY gained with IR versus R. In the PSA, IR was cost‐effective in 78% of iterations using a threshold of €45 000/QALY.

Conclusion

IR can be considered a cost‐effective treatment compared to R, in the treatment of R/R CLL patients for the Spanish NHS.