Clinical outcomes after combined therapy with dutasteride plus tamsulosin or either monotherapy in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by baseline characteristics: 4-year results from the randomized, double-blind Combination of Avodart and Tamsulosin (CombAT) trial

What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) centres on two drug classes, 5α‐reductase inhibitors and α‐blockers. The 4‐year Combination of Avodart® and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study investigated whether the combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin was more effective than either monotherapy in reducing the relative risk of AUR, BPH‐related surgery, and BPH clinical progression in men with moderate‐to‐severe LUTS who were at increased risk of disease progression. Data from the 2‐ and 4‐year, pre‐planned primary and secondary endpoint analyses for the CombAT study have been reported previously. This study reports the outcomes of post hoc analyses of the influence of baseline parameters on the incidence of AUR, BPH‐related surgery, and overall clinical progression in patients treated with tamsulosin, dutasteride, or combination therapy with both agents.

OBJECTIVE

? To investigate the influence of baseline variables on the 4‐year incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)‐related surgery and overall clinical progression in men treated with tamsulosin, dutasteride, or a combination of both.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? The 4‐year Combination of Avodart® and Tamsulosin (CombAT) study was a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, parallel‐group study of clinical outcomes in men aged ≥50 years with symptomatic (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS]≥12) BPH, with prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) levels of ≥1.5 ng/mL and ≤10 ng/mL, and a prostate volume (PV) of ≥30 mL. ? Eligible patients received tamsulosin 0.4 mg, dutasteride 0.5 mg, or a combination of both. ? The primary endpoint was time to first AUR or BPH‐related surgery. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression of BPH and symptoms. Posthoc analyses of the influence of baseline variables (including age, IPSS health‐related quality of life [HRQL], PV, PSA, IPSS, peak urinary flow rate [Q_max] and body‐mass index [BMI]) on the incidence of AUR or BPH‐related surgery, clinical progression of BPH, and symptoms were performed.

RESULTS

? There were 4844 men in the intent‐to‐treat population. Overall baseline characteristics were similar across all patient groups. ? Regardless of baseline subgroup, the incidence of AUR or BPH‐related surgery was higher in men treated with tamsulosin than in those treated with dutasteride or combined therapy. ? Combined therapy was statistically better than tamsulosin in reducing the risk of AUR or BPH‐related surgery in subgroups of baseline PV > 42.0 mL, in all subgroups of baseline PSA level, and all other baseline subgroups (P≤ 0.001). ? Across treatment groups, the incidence of clinical progression was highest in men with a baseline IPSS of <20 or IPSS HRQL score of <4. The incidence of clinical progression was also higher in men receiving tamsulosin than dutasteride or combined therapy in all baseline subgroups, except for men with a baseline PV of <40 mL. Combined therapy reduced the relative risk (RR) of clinical progression compared with tamsulosin across all baseline subgroups and compared with dutasteride across most baseline subgroups. ? Symptom deterioration was the most common progression event in each treatment group regardless of baseline subgroup, except in those men with an IPSS of ≥20 at baseline. Combined therapy reduced the RR of symptom deterioration compared with tamsulosin across all but one baseline subgroup (the reduction was not significant for men with a baseline PV of <40 mL) and compared with dutasteride in most subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

? Men with a baseline PV of ≥40 mL and any baseline PSA level of ≥1.5 ng/mL had greater reductions in the RR of AUR or BPH‐related surgery and greater reductions in the RR of clinical progression and symptom deterioration on combined therapy or dutasteride monotherapy than on tamsulosin monotherapy. ? These analyses support the long‐term use of combined therapy with dutasteride plus tamsulosin in men with moderate‐to‐severe BPH symptoms and a slightly enlarged prostate.     

Prostate-specific antigen improves the ability of clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum to predict the pathologic stage at radical prostatectomy in the new millennium

OBJECTIVES: The contemporary ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to predict pathologic stage in men with localized prostate cancer was recently questioned. METHODS: We quantified the added value related to the addition of pretreatment PSA to established pathologic stage predictors (namely clinical stage and biopsy Gleason sum) in 5921 consecutive radical prostatectomy (RP) patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses predicting pathologic stage (extracapsular extension [ECE], seminal vesicle invasion [SVI], lymph node invasion [LNI], and organ-confined disease [OC]) were stratified according to four time quartiles. The gain in predictive accuracy (PA) related to the inclusion of PSA to multivariable models was quantified by using the area under the curve method. RESULTS: Temporal analyses showed a decrease in PSA levels over the study years (p<0.001). Conversely, the rate of nonpalpable disease and the rate of biopsy Gleason sum < or =6 increased over time (all p<0.001). At RP, the rate of OC increased over time, while the rate of ECE and SVI decreased over time (all p<0.001). The rate of LNI remained stable (p=0.1). In multivariable models, PSA represented an independent predictor of all pathologic stages over time (all p<0.03), except for ECE in the first and last time quartiles. The addition of PSA significantly increased the multivariable PA of all models predicting pathologic stages over time (all p<0.03), except for ECE predictions in the first quartile (p=0.1). CONCLUSIONS: In the new millennium, PSA has not lost its ability to accurately predict the pathologic stage in contemporary patients.     

The benign prostatic hyperplasia registry and patient survey: study design, methods and patient baseline characteristics

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design and baseline cohort characteristics of the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Registry and Patient Survey, an ongoing, prospective, observational, disease registry documenting management practices and patient outcomes in men in the USA with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH (LUTS/BPH) in actual clinical practice settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with LUTS/BPH who were either untreated or treated with alpha(1)-adrenergic blockers (ABs), 5alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), a combination of these medications, or anticholinergics, and who met selection criteria, were enrolled at sites throughout the USA. At each visit, standardized forms and validated questionnaires were completed to assess the physicians' management practices and patients' clinical characteristics, sexual function, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: At the close of recruitment (February 2005), 6909 men (mean age 66.0 years) were enrolled at 402 sites by urologists and primary-care physicians. Before enrolment, 49% of the men were managed with watchful waiting (WW), 21% with uroselective AB monotherapy, 11% with non-uroselective AB monotherapy, 6% with 5ARI monotherapy, 11% with AB + 5ARI, and 2% with anticholinergics. After enrolment, 42% were on WW and 26% were on selective AB monotherapy; changes in other management groups were minimal. Overall, 33% of the men had mild, 52% had moderate and 15% had severe LUTS. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (53%), high cholesterol (45%) and sexual dysfunction (36%). CONCLUSION: The BPH Registry and Patient Survey will provide information on physician management practices and outcomes of men with LUTS/BPH, while examining the effects of demographics, socio-economics, comorbidities, and medical therapies.     

Use of combined apoptosis biomarkers for prediction of bladder cancer recurrence and mortality after radical cystectomy

BACKGROUND: Deregulation of apoptosis is a characteristic of human carcinogenesis. We aimed to investigate expression of the apoptosis markers Bcl-2, caspase-3, P53, and survivin and the association with oncological outcomes of patients treated by radical cystectomy and bilateral lymphadenectomy for urothelial-cell carcinoma of the bladder. METHODS: Bcl-2, caspase-3, P53, and survivin immunostaining was undertaken on serial tissue microarrays containing cores from 226 consecutive patients (median follow-up 36.9 months [IQR 13.3-79.0]). 200 bootstrap resamples with replacement were done to reduce overfit bias and for internal validation. FINDINGS: Expression of Bcl-2, caspase-3, P53, and survivin was altered in 73 (32%), 111 (49%), 120 (53%), and 141 (64%) patients, respectively. By univariate analysis, altered expression of Bcl-2, caspase-3, P53, and survivin were all associated with high probability of disease recurrence (hazard ratio 2.24 [95% CI 1.51-3.32], p<0.001; 1.73 [1.16-2.59], p=0.007; 2.70 [1.77-4.12], p<0.001; and 2.32 [1.48-3.63], p<0.001) and disease-specific mortality (2.06 [1.33-3.18], p=0.001; 2.35 [1.48-3.73], p<0.001; 3.23 [1.98-5.28], p<0.001; and 2.64 [1.57-4.44], p<0.001; respectively). Risk of recurrence and disease-specific mortality progressively grew with increasing number of altered biomarkers. By multivariate analysis, alteration of four markers was independently associated with high rates of disease recurrence (4.03 [1.23-13.16], p=0.021) and disease-specific mortality (6.84 [1.43-32.63], p=0.016). Addition of the number of altered markers to a model that included standard predictors significantly enhanced its predictive accuracy for disease recurrence and disease-specific survival. INTERPRETATION: Bcl-2, caspase-3, P53, and survivin have a cooperative effect on progression of bladder cancer. Assessment of combined apoptosis marker status and number of altered markers in patients treated by radical cystectomy provides prognostic information that could help to identify those at high risk for disease recurrence and mortality, who could benefit from early adjuvant treatment.     

Effect of 1 mg/day finasteride on concentrations of serum prostate-specific antigen in men with androgenic alopecia: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Use of 5 mg/day finasteride (Proscar) for benign prostatic hyperplasia is known to affect serum concentrations of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). When men taking this treatment undergo screening for prostate cancer, a compensatory adjustment of the PSA concentration (to multiply the value by two) is recommended. Whether this recommendation should apply to men taking 1 mg/day finasteride (Propecia) for the treatment of androgenic alopecia is unknown. We aimed to assess the effect of 1 mg/day finasteride on serum PSA in men aged 40-60 years with male-pattern hair loss. METHODS: Between March 13, 1998, and Jan 12, 2000, 355 men aged 40-60 years with male-pattern hair loss were stratified by age decade (40-49 years and 50-60 years), and randomised in a ratio of four to one to 1 mg/day finasteride or placebo. The primary endpoint was the effect of this treatment for 48 weeks on serum PSA concentration compared with placebo. This trial is in the process of being registered on the US National Institutes of Health website . Analyses were according to protocol. FINDINGS: Within 48 weeks of randomisation, men aged 40-49 years and 50-60 years who were assigned 1 mg/day finasteride had a median decrease in serum PSA concentration of 40% (95% CI 34-46) and 50% (44-57), respectively. In men assigned placebo, the median changes were 0% [-14 to 14] and a median increase of 13% [2 to 24], respectively. INTERPRETATION: In men aged 40-60 years, 1 mg/day finasteride for 48 weeks lowers serum PSA concentration. Therefore, the existing recommendation for the adjustment of serum PSA concentration in prostate-cancer screening in men taking 5 mg/day finasteride should also apply to men taking the 1 mg/day preparation for male-pattern hair loss. Research is needed to assess the effect of 1 mg/day finasteride preparation beyond 48 weeks of treatment.