HPV antibody levels and clinical efficacy following administration of a prophylactic quadrivalent HPV vaccine

The efficacy of the quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is thought to be mediated by humoral immunity. We evaluated the correlation between quadrivalent HPV vaccine-induced serum anti-HPV responses and efficacy. 17,622 women were vaccinated at day 1, and months 2 and 6. At day 1 and at 6-12 months intervals for up to 48 months, subjects underwent Papanicolaou and genital HPV testing. No immune correlate of protection could be found due to low number of cases. Although 40% of vaccine subjects were anti-HPV 18 seronegative at end-of-study, efficacy against HPV 18-related disease remained high (98.4%; 95% CI: 90.5-100.0) despite high attack rates in the placebo group. These results suggest vaccine-induced protection via immune memory, or lower than detectable HPV 18 antibody titers.     

Solid Organ Cancer and Melanoma in Kidney Transplant Recipients: TumorTx Base Preliminary Results

Background

Incidence of malignancy in transplant recipients is higher than in the general population. Malignancy is a major cause of mortality following solid organ transplantation and a major barrier to long-term survival for the kidney. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of solid organ malignancy (SOM) and melanoma in renal transplant recipients (RTR) transplanted at 2 representative transplant centers in Poland based on data from the Polish Tumor Registry.

Primary ovarian Burkitt’s lymphoma: a rare oncological problem in gynaecology: a review of literature

Purpose

This review presents the information about epidemiology, clinical manifestation, diagnosis and treatment of primary ovarian Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL), including a literature search of available BL cases. The purpose of this review is to draw clinicians’ attention to the possibility of ovarian BL occurrence, which may be important in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumours.

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords ‘‘Burkitt’s’’, ‘‘Lymphoma’’, ‘‘Ovarian’’, ‘‘Primary’’, ‘‘Burkitt’s lymphoma’’. Only cases with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of primary ovarian BL were included in this review.

Results

Fifty articles, reporting cases with an ovarian manifestation of primary non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, were found. Twenty-one cases with a histopathologically confirmed BL were evaluated to compare various manifestations, treatment and prognosis in ovarian BL.

Conclusions

Primary ovarian BL is a rare condition, included in the entity of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The tumour can occur uni- or bilaterally in the ovaries with major symptoms such as abdominal pain or a large abdominal mass. Differential diagnosis, based on imaging features and pathological examination of the specimens, is essential for further treatment due to various aetiology of ovarian tumours. Although most of the patients suffering from ovarian BL underwent surgery after the ovarian tumour had been detected, surgical treatment is not the treatment of choice in patients with ovarian lymphoma. The mainstay of therapy is chemotherapy without further surgery. The prognosis is better if the chemotherapy protocol is more aggressive and followed by prophylactic central nervous system chemotherapy. Nowadays, multiagent protocols are administered, which improves the survival rate.

     

Usefulness of the HE4 biomarker as a second-line test in the assessment of suspicious ovarian tumors

Purpose

The aim of our study was the evaluation of HE4 usefulness as a test in assessment of ovarian tumors which are suspicious and difficult to classify correctly via subjective ultrasound examination.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study 253 women diagnosed with adnexal masses were examined preoperatively. Suspicious tumors (n = 145) were divided into groups of: “probably benign” (n = 70), “uncertain” (n = 34), and “probably malignant” (n = 41). “Uncertain” tumors were also assessed as “benign” (n = 11) or “malignant” (n = 23). The logistic regression model was performed to analyze if the serum marker improves the prediction of a malignant finding and net reclassification improvement (NRI) was calculated to measure diagnostic improvement.

Results

Within the analyzed group 85 (58.6 %) benign and 60 (41.4 %) malignant tumors were confirmed histopathologically. The comparison of HE4 with subjective ultrasound assessment showed lowered NRI in the entire analyzed group as well as in the groups of tumors classified as “probably benign” or “probably malignant” (NRI = ?0.16; P = 0.0139 and NRI = ?0.133; P = 0.0489, respectively). The analysis of logistic regression model confirmed that biomarkers do not improve diagnostic accuracy. The difference between areas under ROC for HE4 (0.891) and CA125 (0.902) was not statistically significant (P = 0.760).

Conclusions

After subjective ultrasound assessment, the addition of the second-line test—HE4 as well as CA125 serum level does not improve diagnostic performance. However, HE4 evaluation satisfies the clinical expectations of diagnostic tools for ovarian tumors and, thus, may be useful to less experienced sonographers.