Recurrent carotid stenosis. Incidence and management

The actual incidence of recurrent carotid occlusive disease is not known. From January 1974 through December 1984, fifty-four patients underwent at least one second carotid endarterectomy or reconstructive procedure at St. Thomas Hospital in Nashville. Five patients required a third carotid operation. This retrospective study examines case reports, risk factors, patient presentation, interval of recurrence, and pathology involved. Surgical techniques and results are described. Complications occurred in six patients undergoing a total of 66 operations for an overall incidence of 9 per cent. Thrombosis was minimized by the use of antiplatelet drugs. Follow-up of patients ranged from one to 84 months. Four main causes for restenosis are discussed.     

Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms after liver transplantation.

It is estimated that 1.7% of orthotopic liver transplant recipients will develop abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after transplantation. It has been observed that these aneurysms expand faster in transplant recipients; therefore, aggressive surveillance for AAAs in transplant recipients is required. Endovascular aneurysm repair is rapidly becoming the standard of care, especially in patients with previous abdominal surgery and other significant comorbidities. This article describes our experience with AAAs in orthotopic liver transplant recipients treated successfully by endovascular stent graft repair.     

Preselection Thymocytes Are More Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Stimulation Than Mature T Cells

During T cell development, thymocytes which are tolerant to self-peptides but reactive to foreign peptides are selected. The current model for thymocyte selection proposes that self-peptide–major histocompatibility complex (MHC) complexes that bind the T cell receptor with low affinity will promote positive selection while those with high affinity will result in negative selection. Upon thymocyte maturation, such low affinity self-peptide–MHC ligands no longer provoke a response, but foreign peptides can incidentally be high affinity ligands and can therefore stimulate T cells. For this model to work, thymocytes must be more sensitive to ligand than mature T cells. Contrary to this expectation, several groups have shown that thymocytes are less responsive than mature T cells to anti-T cell receptor for antigen (TCR)/CD3 mAb stimulation. Additionally, the lower TCR levels on thymocytes, compared with T cells, would potentially correlate with decreased thymocyte sensitivity. Here we compared preselection thymocytes and mature T cells for early activation events in response to peptide–MHC ligands. Remarkably, the preselection thymocytes were more responsive than mature T cells when stimulated with low affinity peptide variants, while both populations responded equally well to the antigenic peptide. This directly demonstrates the increased sensitivity of thymocytes compared with T cells for TCR engagement by peptide–MHC complexes.     

Referral letters: are form letters better?

An essential mode of contact between general practitioners (GPs) and hospital staff is the referral letter. This must be clear and concise with sufficient information to aid the GP, the consultant and the patient. In order to ensure this, a proposal was made for the use of a structured or standardized referral letter: a form letter. This report shows that form letters were shorter than typed letters. Form letters were also proven to contain more information than nonform letters.     

Use of double-pigtail stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

Double-pigtail stents are placed commonly in patients before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to prevent ureteral obstruction from steinstrasse. The use of double-pigtail stents in lithotripsy patients with a moderate stone burden was studied in a prospective randomized trial. Patients with unilateral renal stone(s) with at least 1 diameter between 7 and 25 mm. were eligible for the study. Fifty patients were randomized to a control or stented group. Double-pigtail stents with an attached suture were placed immediately before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the stented group. Stents were removed by the patients 1 week after lithotripsy. A survey on pain and associated symptoms was completed by patients at 1 and 14 days after treatment. There was no statistical difference in flank or abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, temperature or use of analgesics at 1 and 14 days after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the control and stented groups. All patients in the stented groups complained of side effects attributable to the stent including urinary frequency and urgency, bladder pain, hematuria and flank pain with urination. Of 25 patients with stents 7 (27%) had early removal because of severe irritation, early migration or accidental removal. Among the patients with follow-up x-rays 1 month after treatment 17 of 21 (81%) in the control group and 12 of 19 (63%) in the stented group showed no evidence of remaining stones. The use of double-pigtail stents is not beneficial in patients with a moderate stone burden. Double-pigtail stents are associated with considerable patient discomfort but no decrease in symptomatic ureteral obstruction or final stone eradication rate.     

Erythematous Bullous Lesions on the Dorsa of the Hands Due to Contact Exposure to Ibutilide Fumarate for Injection

While waiting to observe the response to ibutilide fumarate by a patient with atrial fibrillation, a nurse preparing the intravenous solution inadvertently spilled the drug on the hands of a medical resident. The resident immediately wiped his hands dry with disposable paper towels. Several hours later he sensed tingling and itching over the area, and the next day two erythematous bullous lesions were present on the dorsal surfaces of both hands. A single application of topical steroid was applied to the affected areas. The lesions were kept clean and dry, and healed completely in approximately 10 days. This is an unusual allergic reaction due to contact with ibutilide fumarate.