Unmet Needs in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune rheumatic disease with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 1000. Over the last 30 years, advances in treatment such as use of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants have improved life expectancy and quality of life for patients with lupus and the key unmet needs have therefore changed. With the reduced mortality from disease activity, development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has become an increasingly important cause of death in patients with SLE. The increased CVD risk in these patients is partly, but not fully explained by standard risk factors, and abnormalities in the immune response to lipids may play a role. Invariant natural killer T cells, which are triggered specifically by lipid antigens, may protect against progression of subclinical atherosclerosis. However, currently our recommendation is that clinicians should focus on optimal management of standard CVD risk factors such as smoking, blood pressure and lipid levels. Fatigue is one of the most common and most limiting symptoms suffered by patients with SLE. The cause of fatigue is multifactorial and disease activity does not explain this symptom. Consequently, therapies directed towards reducing inflammation and disease activity do not reliably reduce fatigue and new approaches are needed. Currently, we recommend asking about sleep pattern, optimising pain relief and excluding other causes of fatigue such as anaemia and metabolic disturbances. For the subgroup of patients whose disease activity is not fully controlled by standard treatment regimes, a range of different biologic agents have been proposed and subjected to clinical trials. Many of these trials have given disappointing results, though belimumab, which targets B lymphocytes, did meet its primary endpoint. New biologics targeting B cells, T cells or cytokines (especially interferon) are still going through trials raising the hope that novel therapies for patients with refractory SLE may be available soon.     

Classical to current approach for treatment of psoriasis: a review

Psoriasis is a genetic predisposition with T-cell mediated autoimmune inflammatory skin disorder, characterized by cutaneous inflammation, increased epidermal proliferation, hyperkeratosis, angiogenesis, and abnormal keratinization that affects up to 2 - 3% of the population worldwide. Common therapies that are used for the treatment of psoriasis include topical, systemic, phototherapy, combination, herbal therapy and novel molecules. Topically used agents include Vit D, calcipotriol, corticosteroids, dithranol and retinoids etc. Systemically used agents include methotrexate and cyclosporine etc. Phototherapy includes UV-B, Psoralen plus ultraviolet therapy and excimer laser etc. These therapies have a number of potential problems, such as limited in efficacy, inconvenience, organ toxicity, carcinogenic and broadband immunosuppression. In natural treatment a variety of natural agents such as methanolic extracts of duzhong (Eucommia ulmoides Oliv.), yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis,) linseed oil, fish oil, and Indigo naturalis etc., that modulates T cell and cytokine action at various steps along with the pathogenic sequence have been developed. But till now there is no more in vivo, dose and its efficacy data has been established. Current therapy includes biologicals, small molecules inhibitor and enzyme inhibitors etc, which serve as novel therapeutic options for psoriasis treatment. All these avoid the side effects of the prebiologically developed systemic agents including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and bone marrow suppression. Currently, Denilukin diftitox, Efalizumab, Alefacept, Ustekinumab and Etanercept are approved by the FDA, and others molecules are at clinical stage. Patents issued by the US office are also included in current psoriasis treatment scenario. In the United States, biologicals are widely used for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. But because of the high cost of medication and their availability in injection form, it remains to be seen how widely these agents will be utilized worldwide. Still, developing countries prefer conventional drugs.     

Efficacy and safety of parenteral omega 3 fatty acids in ventilated patients with acute lung injury

Objective:

To determine the effects of parenteral omega 3 fatty acids (10% fatty acids) on respiratory parameters and outcome in ventilated patients with acute lung injury.

Measurements and Main Results:

Patients were randomized into two groups – one receiving standard isonitrogenous isocaloric enteral diet and the second receiving standard diet supplemented with parenteral omega 3 fatty acids (Omegaven, Fresenius Kabi) for 14 days. Patients demographics, APACHE IV, Nutritional assessment and admission category was noted at the time of admission. No significant difference was found in nutritional variables (BMI, Albumin). Compared with baseline PaO²/FiO² ratio (control vs. drug group: 199 ± 124 vs. 145 ± 100; P = 0.06), by days 4, 7, and 14, patients receiving the drug did not show a significant improvement in oxygenation (PaO²/FiO²: 151.83 ± 80.19 vs. 177.19 ± 94.05; P = 0.26, 145.20 ± 109.5 vs. 159.48 ± 109.89; P = 0.61 and 95.97 ± 141.72 vs. 128.97 ± 140.35; P = 0.36). However, the change in oxygenation from baseline to day 14 was significantly better in the intervention as compared to control group (145/129 vs. 199/95; P < 0.0004). There was no significant difference in the length of ventilation (LOV) and length of ICU stay (LOS). There was no difference in survival at 28 days. Also, there was no significant difference in the length of ventilation and ICU stay in the survivors group as compared to the non survivors group.

Conclusions:

In ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, intravenous Omega 3 fatty acids alone do not improve ventilation, length of ICU stay, or survival.     

A prospective open-label trial of Remicade in patients with severe exacerbation of Crohn's disease requiring hospitalization: a comparison with outcomes previously observed in patients receiving intravenous hydrocortisone

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment response to intravenous (IV) infliximab (IFX) as a first-line therapy in patients hospitalized for severe Crohn's disease and compare it with our earlier data using IV hydrocortisone. METHODS: Seventeen cases received IFX (5 mg/kg) and were matched for the same goal of therapy to those who had received hydrocortisone (300 mg/d). The Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America-International Organization of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CCFA-IOIBD) score was obtained for the IFX-treated cases on admission and daily and the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) score weekly throughout the hospitalization and compared with those who received hydrocortisone. Discharge was guided by the same criteria in both groups. RESULTS: For the IFX group, the admission mean CCFA-IOIBD score was 13.5 (+/-4.4). Eight of 17 patients achieved a clinical response with a mean score of 4 (+/-1.5), representing a >or=50% reduction from baseline to discharge. The mean admission score for the hydrocortisone group was 17.75 (+/-7.1) with 13 of 16 achieving a mean score of 4.5 (+/-2.3). The mean discharge score for the 17 IFX patients was 6.9 (+/-3) and for the hydrocortisone group was 5.9 (+/-3.2). Median length of hospitalization for the IFX patients was 4 days (range 1 to 9) and 7.5 (5 to 15) days for the hydrocortisone group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: IFX therapy was an effective first-line agent in patients with severe Crohn's disease who require hospitalization and therefore a primary treatment option. Most patients receiving IFX can anticipate a briefer hospitalization than with IV hydrocortisone. Failure of an early response can provide an opportunity to consider an alternate form of therapy sooner with IFX than with hydrocortisone.