全文获取类型
收费全文 | 605篇 |
免费 | 47篇 |
国内免费 | 16篇 |
专业分类
儿科学 | 33篇 |
妇产科学 | 11篇 |
基础医学 | 90篇 |
口腔科学 | 9篇 |
临床医学 | 83篇 |
内科学 | 137篇 |
皮肤病学 | 3篇 |
神经病学 | 17篇 |
特种医学 | 98篇 |
外科学 | 61篇 |
综合类 | 46篇 |
预防医学 | 27篇 |
眼科学 | 1篇 |
药学 | 30篇 |
中国医学 | 1篇 |
肿瘤学 | 21篇 |
出版年
2022年 | 2篇 |
2021年 | 12篇 |
2019年 | 5篇 |
2018年 | 10篇 |
2017年 | 4篇 |
2016年 | 10篇 |
2015年 | 15篇 |
2014年 | 17篇 |
2013年 | 20篇 |
2012年 | 25篇 |
2011年 | 26篇 |
2010年 | 28篇 |
2009年 | 18篇 |
2008年 | 13篇 |
2007年 | 22篇 |
2006年 | 12篇 |
2005年 | 20篇 |
2004年 | 8篇 |
2003年 | 18篇 |
2002年 | 17篇 |
2001年 | 9篇 |
2000年 | 15篇 |
1999年 | 19篇 |
1998年 | 28篇 |
1997年 | 28篇 |
1996年 | 26篇 |
1995年 | 31篇 |
1994年 | 18篇 |
1993年 | 17篇 |
1992年 | 6篇 |
1991年 | 8篇 |
1990年 | 16篇 |
1989年 | 28篇 |
1988年 | 19篇 |
1987年 | 15篇 |
1986年 | 10篇 |
1985年 | 6篇 |
1984年 | 5篇 |
1983年 | 11篇 |
1982年 | 6篇 |
1981年 | 7篇 |
1980年 | 10篇 |
1979年 | 3篇 |
1978年 | 7篇 |
1977年 | 3篇 |
1976年 | 4篇 |
1975年 | 2篇 |
1932年 | 1篇 |
1925年 | 1篇 |
1924年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有668条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
661.
662.
Hemofiltration compared to hemodialysis for acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis
JO Friedrich R Wald SM Bagshaw KE Burns NK Adhikari 《Critical care (London, England)》2012,16(4):R146-16
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of renal replacement therapy (RRT), delivered as hemofiltration vs. hemodialysis, on clinical outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and conference abstracts were searched to June 2012 for parallel-group or crossover randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating hemofiltration vs. hemodialysis in patients with AKI. Two authors independently selected studies and abstracted data on study quality and outcomes. Additional information was obtained from trial authors. We pooled data using random-effects models. RESULTS: Of 6657 citations, 19 RCTs (10 parallel-group and 9 crossover) met inclusion criteria. Sixteen trials used continuous RRT. Study quality was variable. The primary analysis included 3 parallel-group trials comparing similar doses of hemofiltration and hemodialysis; sensitivity analyses included trials comparing combined hemofiltration-hemodialysis or dissimilar doses. We found no effect of hemofiltration on mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.25, p=0.76; 3 trials, n=121 [primary analysis]; RR 1.10, 95%CI 0.88-1.38, p=0.38; 8 trials, n=540 [sensitivity analysis]) or other clinical outcomes (RRT dependence in survivors, vasopressor use, organ dysfunction) compared to hemodialysis. Hemofiltration appeared to shorten time to filter failure (mean difference [MD] -7 hours, 95%CI[-19,+5], p=0.24; 2 trials, n=50 [primary analysis]; MD -5 hours, 95%CI[-10, -1], p=0.01; 3 trials, n=113 [including combined hemofiltration-hemodialysis trials comparing similar doses]; MD -6 hours, 95% CI[-10, -1], p=0.02; 5 trials, n=383 [sensitivity analysis]). Data primarily from crossover RCTs suggested that hemofiltration increased clearance of medium to larger molecules, including inflammatory cytokines, compared to hemodialysis, although almost no studies measured changes in serum concentrations. Meta-analyses were based on very limited data. CONCLUSIONS: Data from small RCTs do not suggest beneficial clinical outcomes from hemofiltration, but confidence intervals were wide. Hemofiltration may increase clearance of medium to larger molecules. Larger trials are required to evaluate effects on clinical outcomes. 相似文献
663.
ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase (1948 to March 2011) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before-after observational studies comparing a strategy of routine CXRs to a more restrictive approach with CXRs performed to investigate clinical changes among critically ill adults or children. In duplicate, we extracted data on the CXR strategy, study quality and clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stay). RESULTS: Nine studies (39,358 CXRs; 9,611 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Three trials (N = 870) of moderate to good quality provided information on the safety of a restrictive routine CXR strategy; only one trial systematically assessed for missed findings. Pooled data from trials showed no evidence of effect of a restrictive approach on ICU mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.72; two trials, N = 776), hospital mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41, P = 0.91; two trials, N = 259), ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.86 days, 95% CI -2.38 to 0.66 days, P = 0.27; three trials, N = 870), hospital length of stay (WMD -2.50 days, 95% CI -6.62 to 1.61 days, P = 0.23; two trials, N = 259), or duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -0.30 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.89 days, P = 0.62; three trials, N = 705). Adding data from six observational studies, one of which systematically screened for missed findings, gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis did not detect any harm associated with a restrictive chest radiograph strategy. However, confidence intervals were wide and harm was not rigorously assessed. Therefore, the safety of abandoning routine CXRs in patients admitted to the ICU remains uncertain. 相似文献
664.
Ron Wald Jan O Friedrich Sean M Bagshaw Karen EA Burns Amit X Garg Michelle A Hladunewich Andrew A House Stephen Lapinsky David Klein Neesh I Pannu Karen Pope Robert M Richardson Kevin Thorpe Neill KJ Adhikari 《Critical care (London, England)》2012,16(5):R205
Introduction
Among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) needing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), the effect of convective (via continuous venovenous hemofiltration [CVVH]) versus diffusive (via continuous venovenous hemodialysis [CVVHD]) solute clearance on clinical outcomes is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of comparing these two modes in a randomized trial.Methods
This was a multicenter open-label parallel-group pilot randomized trial of CVVH versus CVVHD. Using concealed allocation, we randomized critically ill adults with AKI and hemodynamic instability to CVVH or CVVHD, with a prescribed small solute clearance of 35 mL/kg/hour in both arms. The primary outcome was trial feasibility, defined by randomization of >25% of eligible patients, delivery of >75% of the prescribed CRRT dose, and follow-up of >95% of patients to 60 days. A secondary analysis using a mixed-effects model examined the impact of therapy on illness severity, defined by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, over the first week.Results
We randomized 78 patients (mean age 61.5 years; 39% women; 23% with chronic kidney disease; 82% with sepsis). Baseline SOFA scores (mean 15.9, SD 3.2) were similar between groups. We recruited 55% of eligible patients, delivered >80% of the prescribed dose in each arm, and achieved 100% follow-up. SOFA tended to decline more over the first week in CVVH recipients (-0.8, 95% CI -2.1, +0.5) driven by a reduction in vasopressor requirements. Mortality (54% CVVH; 55% CVVHD) and dialysis dependence in survivors (24% CVVH; 19% CVVHD) at 60 days were similar.Conclusions
Our results suggest that a large trial comparing CVVH to CVVHD would be feasible. There is a trend toward improved vasopressor requirements among CVVH-treated patients over the first week of treatment.Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00675818相似文献665.
Two international multicentre randomised controlled trials of drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA), the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation of Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) and Administration of Drotrecogin Alfa (Activated) in Early Stage Severe Sepsis (ADDRESS) trials, have produced inconsistent results. When 28-day mortality data from these trials for patients with severe sepsis and at high risk of death are pooled using a standard random-effects meta-analysis technique, there is no statistically significant survival benefit (for patients with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores of 25 or more), or a borderline significant benefit (for patients with multi-organ failure). We argue that two important methodological issues might explain the disparate results between the two trials. These issues centre on early trial stopping, which exaggerates treatment effects, and reliance on subgroup analyses, which for DrotAA yields inconsistent results across different definitions of high risk. These concerns call into question the effectiveness of DrotAA in any patients with severe sepsis. Consequently, further randomised trials of this agent in prospectively defined high-risk patients are required to clarify its role in the management of severe sepsis. 相似文献
666.
667.
Richard Battle Deborah Pritchard Sarah Peacock Catherine Hastie Judith Worthington Sue Jordan Jennifer A McCaughlan Martin Barnardo Rebecca Cope Claire Collins Natalia Diaz-Burlinson Carla Rosser Luke Foster Delordson Kallon Olivia Shaw David Briggs David Turner Arthi Anand Arash Akbarzad-Yousefi Deborah Sage 《International journal of immunogenetics》2023,50(Z2):3-63
Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation. 相似文献
668.
Sandip Biswal Trevor Hastie Thomas P. Andriacchi Gabrielle A. Bergman Michael F. Dillingham Philipp Lang 《Arthritis \u0026amp; Rheumatology》2002,46(11):2884-2892