MM6 Decision Analysis: What is its Utility for Pharmacoeconomic Analysis?

This session is intended for sharing and comparing computer software applications for research, management, and practice. Software applications will be demonstrated for decision analysis, cost effectiveness analysis, multiattribute utility computation, and assessing patient utilities. Desktop applications, will be discussed. Laptop and handheld computer software will be demonstrated. Pharmacoeconomic software allows data to be analyzed from different perspectives: patient, provider, hospital, managed care, and society. Software models also allow assessment of health care products or services from different quantitative perspectives: cost of illness, cost minimization, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and cost-utility. The integration of decision analysis and spreadsheets will also be discussed. Software is utilized to collect information, analyze data, present findings, or educate managers, providers and patients. Pros and cons of each analytical and software approach will be discussed. Participants are encouraged to bring their own laptops to demonstrate their own software or related Internet offerings in an informal roundtable fashion. Software beta versions allowed; "viruses" discouraged.     

A double‐blind,randomized trial of 0.05% betamethasone vs. topical catalase/dismutase superoxide in vitiligo

Background Among all the topical immunomodulators, vitiligo's mainstay therapy includes topical corticosteroids. Many other non‐immune theories have also been suggested for vitiligo's pathogenesis, but the role of oxidative stress has gained more importance in recent years. Objective To compare the effect of topical 0.05% betamethasone vs. catalase/dismutase superoxide (C/DSO). Study design Randomized, matched‐paired, double‐blind trial. Setting Dermatology Section, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. Subjects Patients (aged > 18 years or between 12 and 18 years) with parent's informed consent, with stable or active bilateral vitiligo. Intervention Topical 0.05% betamethasone or C/DSO. Methods Two lesions similar to each other in size were chosen. All assessments were made by two blinded investigators, and photographs were subjected to morphometry analysis. Main outcome Skin repigmentation by digital morphometry. Results Twenty‐five patients were enrolled in the study (21 women and 4 men). Mean age of participants was 40 years (range: 12–74 years). One patient on C/DSO experienced a mild local erythematous papular rash that self‐resolved. At 4 months of therapy, there was no statistical difference on the percentage of repigmentation between betamethasone and C/DSO (5.63% ± 27.9 vs. 3.22% ± 25.8, respectively, P = 0.758). After 10 months of therapy, the percentage of skin repigmentation increased to 18.5 ± 93.14% with betamethasone and to 12.4 ± 59% with C/DSO, but again, we found no statistical differences (P = 0.79). Discussion and conclusions Few studies have described objective methods to evaluate repigmentation among vitiligo patients. Digital morphometry provides an objective assessment of repigmentation in vitiligo. Objective vitiligo repigmentation with topical C/DSO at 10 months is similar to topical 0.05% betamethasone. Although a mild adverse effect was related to the use of C/DSO, such finding was not severe enough to discontinue treatment.     

Meniscus tears of the knee: prospective evaluation with CT

A total of 209 patients underwent prospective axial computed tomography (CT) examinations of the knee to evaluate the ability of this technique to identify and characterize knee menisci in patients believed to have meniscus tears. Of the 359 knees examined, 105 subsequently underwent arthrography, arthroscopy, or arthrography and arthroscopic surgery. In this group, the sensitivity of CT was 88.5%, specificity was 95.5%, and accuracy was 91.5%. Although axial CT is a sensitive and effective method for the detection and characterization of tears involving the medial and lateral menisci, purely horizontal or nondisplaced peripheral tears may be difficult to demonstrate.     

An anti-EnaTS detected in the serum of an MiI homozygote

The serum of EH reacted with all red cells (RBCs) except her own, ficin- or trypsin-treated red cells, and En(a-) red cells. This reactivity defined an anti-EnaTS specificity. The red cells of the proposita typed as M-N+S-S+, Vw+Mur-Hil-Hut-Anek-Lane-, Wr(a-b+), EnaKT+. Red cells of five relatives were Vw+ and positive with her serum. Titration studies suggest that EH is genetically an MiI homozygote and that her Vw+ relatives are MiI heterozygotes. There is no history of consanguinity. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting studies have agreed with the serologic observations. A variant sialoglycoprotein of faster mobility than normal glycoprotein A, but no normal glycoprotein A, was detected on her red cells. Treatment with N-glycanase did not alter the mobility, which indicated that there was no N-glycosylation of residue 26. These findings are in agreement with the reported properties of the Mi.I-specific glycoprotein A. The relatives' Vw+ red cells showed the variant sialoglycoprotein and normal glycoprotein A. EH appears to be the first reported MiI homozygote.     

转脑啡肽基因移植细胞微囊化对大鼠慢性周围神经损伤的镇痛作用

目的：观察微囊化转大鼠脑啡肽原基因（pENK）细胞移植对慢性脊神经压榨性损伤大鼠的镇痛效应. 方法：实验于2006-03/2007-04在郑州大学医学重点实验室完成.①实验方法：通过反转录-聚合酶链反应技术可获得大鼠pENK基因,Hind Ⅲ,ClaⅠ双酶切后,同相应双酶切的pLNCX2载体大片段连接,构建成pENK基因反转录病毒载体pLNCX2-Enk,然后用脂质体法将该载体转染PT67细胞,G418筛选,获得携带pENK基因高滴度反转录病毒产毒细胞系.用海藻酸钠-多聚赖氨酸-海藻酸钠微囊包埋后,进行体外培养,定期检测微囊化细胞活性和pENK分泌量变化.同时,将转基因细胞移植于慢性脊神经压榨性损伤大鼠的蛛网膜下腔.②实验分组：SD大鼠60只,其中53只按照Bennett和Xie法制作大鼠慢性左侧坐骨神经压迫性损伤模型,其中42只造模成功.术后1周,将动物按随机数字表法分为3组,每组16只：微囊化转基因细胞移植组、空囊移植组和阴性对照组.微囊化转基因细胞移植组、空囊移植组分别植入微囊化细胞悬液80 μL（约300个微囊）、空微囊悬液80 μL（约300个空囊）,阴性对照组不注射任何悬液.③实验评估：术后2周和8周行甲醛实验,在大鼠一侧后爪掌侧皮下注射体积分数为0.05的甲醛50 μL,观察其注射后1 h内的痛反应.采用Abbott等所推荐的以缩腿及舔爪时间之和作为行为学反应的指标.注射甲醛后,立即记录大鼠1 h内每5 min的缩腿及舔爪时间. 结果：①术后2周甲醛实验：空囊移植组第一时相的急性痛阶段（注射后5 min）和第二时相的慢性痛阶段（注射后41～45 min）大鼠的缩腿及舔爪时间都少于微囊化转基因细胞移植组（P＜0.01）.而在静息期,3组大鼠的缩腿及舔爪时间差异无显著性意义（P＞0.05）.②术后8周甲醛实验：3组大鼠的痛觉行为都呈明显的双时相反应.除了静息期（注射后5～15 min）,微囊化转基因细胞移植组在各时间点上大鼠的缩腿及舔爪时间均低于空囊移植组（P＜0.05）.微囊化转基因细胞移植组大鼠的缩腿及舔爪时间在第一时相的急性痛阶段和第二时相的慢性痛阶段都低于空囊移植组（P＜0.05）. 结论：微囊化转pENK基因细胞移植对慢性神经痛大鼠有一定的镇痛作用,有望成为运动员慢性疼痛治疗的新方法.     

Demographic characteristics and prevalence of serologic markers among donors who use the confidential unit exclusion process: the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: Most blood centers utilize a confidential unit exclusion (CUE) process, intended to reduce the risk of transfusion-associated infectious diseases by allowing high-risk donors confidentially to exclude their blood from use for transfusion. The effectiveness of this method remains controversial. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Confirmatory or supplemental test results for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, human T-lymphotropic virus type I, and hepatitis C virus, as well as hepatitis B surface antigen and syphilis and screening test results for antibodies to hepatitis B core (antigen) and alanine aminotransferase levels were obtained for approximately 1.8 million units donated during 1991 and 1992 at five blood centers within the United States. The prevalences of these infectious disease markers in units that the donors confidentially excluded (CUE+) and units that the donors did not exclude (CUE-) were calculated and examined within demographic subgroups. RESULTS: Units that were CUE+ were 8 to 41 times more likely to be seropositive for antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B surface antigen, and syphilis and three to four times more likely to react for antibody to hepatitis B core (antigen) or to have elevated alanine aminotransferase levels than units that were CUE- (p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of CUE (the percentage of CUE+ units that were confirmed seropositive for any marker) was 3.5 percent, and the sensitivity of CUE (the percentage of confirmed-seropositive units that were CUE+) was 2.3 percent. CONCLUSION: The current CUE process has low sensitivity and apparently low positive predictive value, and in many cases, it appeared that donors misunderstood it. Yet, CUE was not a “random process,” as CUE+ units were more likely to be seropositive for any infectious disease marker than CUE- units. This suggests that efforts to improve the CUE system may be warranted. As risk factors for transfusion-transmitted infection become more difficult to identify by history-based screening, however, such efforts may have limited effect.     

Characterization of the epitope recognized by a monoclonal antibody highly specific for blood group M antigen

The mouse monoclonal antibody M2A1 of IgG1 class, which is highly specific for blood group M antigen, was obtained and characterized by means of hemagglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunoblotting, and inhibition assays. The use of modified M glycoprotein preparations for inhibition tests and of variant McN and Henshaw red cell membranes for immunoblotting showed that M2A1 recognized an epitope including the NH2-terminal serine and sialic acid residues of glycophorin A, whereas the fifth glycine residue was not involved. The reactivity of the antibody with M antigen was distinctly dependent on ionic strength and pH; the optimum was at pH 8 to 9. The alpha-amino group of terminal serine residue was not necessary for the reaction with M2A1 antibody, and the results obtained suggested that the positive charge of this group contributed to decreasing antigen-antibody reactions at pH below 8. The reaction of the antibody with blood group N antigen was not detectable in any of the assays used.     

A study of confidential unit exclusion

The effectiveness of the confidential unit exclusion (CUE) procedure recommended by the Food and Drug Administration has been questioned by the blood banking community. The purpose of this study was to determine whether donors were informing the blood center correctly regarding the disposition (transfuse or do not transfuse) of their donated blood. A letter explaining the confidential study and requesting permission to send the participant a questionnaire noting his or her self-exclusion choice was mailed to 230 donors who had chosen transfuse and 276 donors who had chosen do not transfuse. After consent was obtained, participants were sent a second packet and asked to indicate whether they had chosen correctly and, if not, to identify reasons for that incorrect choice. A seven-word terminology quiz made up of words from the CUE form was also enclosed. All participants who had chosen transfuse indicated that this was the correct choice. Approximately 50 percent of those who had chosen do not transfuse indicated that this was an incorrect choice; the most common reason was that "I was not paying attention." The most frequently misunderstood term was "confidential." Donors who chose do not transfuse had a significantly higher rate of error on the terminology quiz (p less than 0.01) than did those who chose transfuse.