Effect of Hydrogen Peroxide and Catalase Derivatives on Functional Activity of Platelets

Effects of H₂O₂ on platelet aggregation were estimated in vitro in the presence and absence of inductors (ADP, serotonin, TRAP) and native and modified catalase. Dose-dependent effect of H₂O₂ (50 μM or more) was investigated in a pathophysiological concentration of 300 μM inducing platelet aggregation. H₂O₂ modulated aggregation induced by ADP, serotonin, and TRAP significantly increasing the initial platelet aggregation followed by disaggregation, which was always more pronounced than in control. Catalase derivatives (native and modified forms) dose-dependently reduced the effect of H₂O₂ and completely abolished it in a dose of 9000 U catalase activity per 1 ml of solution for native catalase and 1200 U/ml for modified one. Modified catalase, in contrast to native one, produced an independent inhibitory effect on induced platelet aggregation. Components of modified catalase (individual substance and simple mixture) had no antiaggregant effect.     

Reconstruction of soft-tissue injury associated with lower extremity fracture

Soft-tissue loss associated with lower extremity fracture poses a substantial reconstructive challenge. Following stabilization of life-threatening conditions and bony disruptions, the reconstructive team must address the soft-tissue envelope of the limb. The wound is managed with débridement followed by coverage. Coverage options range from basic to complex and include delayed primary closure, healing by secondary intention, skin grafting, local flap coverage, and distant tissue transfer. The choice of soft-tissue coverage method is based on its ability to provide an environment conducive to fracture healing. Understanding the merits and disadvantages of each reconstructive option helps to avoid undertreatment or overtreatment.     

Infection after primary hip arthroplasty: a comparison of 3 Norwegian health registers

Background and purpose

The aim of the present study was to assess incidence of and risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty in data from 3 national health registries. We investigated differences in risk patterns between surgical site infection (SSI) and revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA).

Materials and methods

This observational study was based on prospective data from 2005–2009 on primary THAs and HAs from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (NAR), the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register (NHFR), and the Norwegian Surveillance System for Healthcare–Associated Infections (NOIS). The Norwegian Patient Register (NPR) was used for evaluation of case reporting. Cox regression analyses were performed with revision due to infection as endpoint for data from the NAR and the NHFR, and with SSI as the endpoint for data from the NOIS.

Results

The 1–year incidence of SSI in the NOIS was 3.0% after THA (167/5,540) and 7.3% after HA (103/1,416). The 1–year incidence of revision due to infection was 0.7% for THAs in the NAR (182/24,512) and 1.5% for HAs in the NHFR (128/8,262). Risk factors for SSI after THA were advanced age, ASA class higher than 2, and short duration of surgery. For THA, the risk factors for revision due to infection were male sex, advanced age, ASA class higher than 1, emergency surgery, uncemented fixation, and a National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) risk index of 2 or more. For HAs inserted after fracture, age less than 60 and short duration of surgery were risk factors of revision due to infection.

Interpretation

The incidences of SSI and revision due to infection after primary hip replacements in Norway are similar to those in other countries. There may be differences in risk pattern between SSI and revision due to infection after arthroplasty. The risk patterns for revision due to infection appear to be different for HA and THA.Increasing incidence of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been observed in different countries during the last decade (Kurtz et al. 2008, Dale et al. 2009, Pedersen et al. 2010). There have been several studies on incidence of and risk factors for infection based on data from surveillance systems (Ridgeway et al. 2005, Mannien et al. 2008), arthroplasty (quality) registers (Berbari et al. 1998, Dale et al. 2009, Pedersen et al. 2010), and administrative databases (Mahomed et al. 2003, Kurtz et al. 2008, Ong et al. 2009). There have been reviews on incidence of and risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty, based on publications from databases with different definitions of infection (Urquhart et al. 2009, Jämsen et al. 2010a). Superficial surgical site infections (SSIs) may have risk factors that are different from those of full surgical revisions due to infection. Furthermore, THA and hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) may have different patterns of risk of infection (Ridgeway et al. 2005, Cordero–Ampuero and de Dios 2010).In the present study, we used data from 3 national health registries in Norway to assess incidence and some risk factors for infection after primary hip arthroplasty. Differences in risk patterns between SSI and revision due to infection were investigated for HA and THA.     

Imaging with second-harmonic radiation probes in living tissue

We demonstrate that second-harmonic radiation imaging probes are efficient biomarkers for imaging in living tissue. We show that 100 nm and 300 nm BaTiO(3) nanoparticles used as contrast markers could be detected through 50 μm and 120 μm of mouse tail tissue in vitro or in vivo. Experimental results and Monte-Carlo simulations are in good agreement.