头皮糠疹与巯氧吡啶锌

头皮糠疹是常见病是多发病,临床表现为头皮红斑和脱屑,提示皮损部位表皮结构和功能异常,头皮角质层代谢紊乱,最近对头皮糠疹病因和病理的研究证实马拉色菌,皮脂分泌和个体敏感性是形成上述皮损的3个关键因素,硫氧吡啶锌（PTZ或ZPT）可以有效地杀灭马拉色菌,PTZ的颗粒大小和形状对其在头皮的生物利用度有明显的影响。此外,PTZ的抗菌效果有赖于其分子结构的完整性,在外用制剂中加入附加的游离锌,可以有效防止PTZ解离,从而提高其疗效。     

Child Health and Pediatric Education in Oklahoma

The University of Oklahoma Medical Center has a comprehensive program of pediatric training, research and patient care. Establishment of the Oklahoma Health Center and its Children's Medical Center on the University campus will provide expanded opportunities for training and research in cooperation with other organizations concerned with child health and development.     

Stem Cell Migration and Proliferation During Severe Anemia

The pluripotential stem cell (CFU) compartment of marrow and spleen wasevaluated in mice subjected to an intense erythroid stimulus associated withphenylhydrazine-induced anemia. Erythroid hyperplasia occurred in both marrow and spleen. CFU in the marrowgradually declined to approximately 50per cent of control levels (day 5) whiletheir numbers in the spleen increased(fourfold) by day 3 and were maintainedat this level for several days. Thesechanges in numbers of marrow andsplenic CFU were not associated withCFU proliferation. Thereafter, CFU inthe marrow, but not in the spleen, entered active cell cycle. The data suggestthat CFU migrate from marrow to spleenduring the demands of severe anemia.The induction of marrow CFU into cyclefurther suggests a negative feedback,which, perhaps through cell-cell interaction, maintains stem cells at a criticalcompartment size. The failure of splenicCFU to cycle may reflect the converseeffect, i.e. an inhibition on stem cell proliferation in the wake of an expandedstem cell pool.

Submitted on March 17, 1970 Revised on May 14, 1970 Accepted on June 9, 1970     

LOWER POLE I: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY FOR LOWER POLE NEPHROLITHIASIS—INITIAL RESULTS

PURPOSE: The efficacy of shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal for the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal calculi was determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized, multicenter clinical trial was performed comparing shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous stone removal for symptomatic lower pole only renal calculi 30 mm. or less. RESULTS: Of 128 patients enrolled in the study 60 with a mean stone size of 14.43 mm. were randomized to percutaneous stone removal (58 treated, 2 awaiting treatment) and 68 with a mean stone size of 14.03 mm. were randomized to shock wave lithotripsy (64 treated, 4 awaiting treatment). Followup at 3 months was available for 88% of treated patients. The 3-month postoperative stone-free rates overall were 95% for percutaneous removal versus 37% lithotripsy (p <0.001). Shock wave lithotripsy results varied inversely with stone burden while percutaneous stone-free rates were independent of stone burden. Stone clearance from the lower pole following shock wave lithotripsy was particularly problematic for calculi greater than 10 mm. in diameter with only 7 of 33 (21%) patients becoming stone-free. Re-treatment was necessary in 10 (16%) lithotripsy and 5 (9%) percutaneous cases. There were 9 treatment failures in the lithotripsy group and none in the percutaneous group. Ancillary treatment was necessary in 13% of lithotripsy and 2% percutaneous cases. Morbidity was low overall and did not differ significantly between the groups (percutaneous stone removal 22%, shock wave lithotripsy 11%, p =0.087). In the shock wave lithotripsy group there was no difference in lower pole anatomical measurements between kidneys in which complete stone clearance did or did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Stone clearance from the lower pole following shock wave lithotripsy is poor, especially for stones greater than 10 mm. in diameter. Calculi greater than 10 mm. in diameter are better managed initially with percutaneous removal due to its high degree of efficacy and acceptably low morbidity.