Effects on the buoyant density of rabbit platelets of ADP and agents that increase the concentration of cyclic AMP

Rabbit platelets were aggregated by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), allowed to deaggregate and then separated into density subpopulations by centrifugation through discontinuous Stractan density gradients. Although ADP causes little or no release of the contents of the amine storage granules of rabbit platelets, ADP caused a decrease in platelet density as compared with control platelets subjected to the same procedures except for exposure to ADP. The density change persisted for at least four hours. The apparent size of platelets stimulated with ADP increased initially, but returned to control values during a one-hour period. A similar decrease in platelet density was observed with an albumin density gradient. Under conditions in which aggregation did not occur in response to ADP with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the medium, little or no decrease in platelet density was observed. Agglutination with polylysine did not change platelet density. Thus, not only agents such as thrombin and plasmin that cause the release of the contents of the platelet granules decrease platelet density, but ADP also has this effect. Platelets would be exposed to all of these stimuli during thromboembolic processes, and their effect on platelets may account for the decrease in platelet density observed previously in experiments with rabbits with indwelling aortic catheters. Agents that increase the concentration of cyclic AMP (cAMP) in platelets (PGE1, adenosine, dibutyryl cAMP, forskolin, and papaverine) also decreased platelet density. This effect persisted when the platelets were washed and resuspended in fresh medium and was also demonstrable in plasma. Platelet size was gradually increased by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) which maintains platelets in a disc shape and does not cause the release of granule contents, indicating that the decrease in platelet density caused by PGE1 may be attributable to platelet swelling.     

Abnormal clonogenic potential of T cells from multiple myeloma patients

Peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) from multiple myeloma patients are defective in both proportion and absolute numbers of OKT4+ cells and have a normal proportion but reduced absolute number of OKT8+ cells. To assess the functional capabilities of the T cells in myeloma patients, we cloned the T cells in PBLs using limiting dilution conditions in which 100% of OKT4+ and OKT8+ T cells in normal PBLs are able to form a clone. In contrast, the OKT8+ cells from PBLs of five of seven multiple myeloma patients were severely compromised in their clonogenic potential; only 7% to 25% of OKT8+ T cells appeared to give rise to a clone. Clonogenic potential of the OKT4+ cells in patients was more nearly normal. Analysis of two multiple myeloma patients with abnormally low numbers of T cells in PBLs revealed the existence of abnormalities in the progenitors of T cell clones. In both patients, two to three times as many T cell clones were observed as would have been expected based on the number of PBLs cultured at limiting dilution, indicating that OKT4-8- cells in PBLs are capable of giving rise to OKT4+ and, at lower frequency, to OKT8+ clonal progeny in vitro. We conclude that purely quantitative assessment of T cell subsets should be interpreted with caution, since proportionately normal numbers of OKT8+ cells in patient PBLs are seriously compromised in their ability to give rise to clonal progeny in vitro, and since there appears to be a OKT4-8- population of T cells in PBLs that are committed to become OKT4+ or OKT8+ T cells, but are unable to do so in vivo.     

Water-related nosocomial pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroups 1 and 10

Between August 1978 and November 1983, 21 cases of pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila occurred in the Leiden University Hospital, mainly among immunocompromised patients. A new serogroup of L. pneumophila, designated serogroup 10 (prototype strain Leiden 1), was isolated from bronchial secretions of four patients, and five patients had serological evidence of infection with this organism. Nine patients had a culture-confirmed infection with L. pneumophila serogroup 1. L. pneumophila serogroups 1 and 10 were also isolated from the hot potable water supply in the building to which 19 of the 21 patients had been admitted. The isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 from patients and the hot potable water were identical in studies with monoclonal antibodies and had the same plasmid profiles. These findings provide further evidence that in our hospital potable water contaminated with L. pneumophila is a source of infection, mainly in immunocompromised patients.