The expanding spectrum of low-penetrance TNFRSF1A gene variants in adults presenting with recurrent inflammatory attacks: Clinical manifestations and long-term follow-up

Objective

To analyze the clinical manifestations and response to treatment in a cohort of adult patients presenting with recurrent inflammatory attacks and carrying low-penetrance TNFRSF1A variants, as well as to provide data on their long-term follow-up.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of 36 patients carrying low-penetrance TNFRSF1A variants. Moreover, 60 genetically negative patients treated for recurrent inflammatory attacks and 13 patients with structural TNFRSF1A mutations were also analyzed. Detailed demographic and clinical data were collected at the time of molecular screening and at each follow-up visit. Treatments and markers of inflammation were also assessed.

Results

Individuals with low-penetrance TNFRSF1A variants have a lower family history for inflammatory attacks and present with a later disease onset compared with patients with structural mutations, but do not differ, in this respect, with genetically negative individuals. Moreover, low-penetrance variants are less frequently associated with a chronic disease course, with clinical manifestations such as abdominal pain and myalgia, and with amyloidosis. A distinctive clinical feature is a higher rate of pericarditis. Interestingly, mutation-negative patients were found to present with a significant history of recurrent pharyngitis during childhood. Patients with low-penetrance variants are mostly managed with short courses of steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on attacks. Although the need for a biological treatment is significantly lower compared with patients with structural mutations, still approximately 20% of individuals with recurrent inflammatory attacks carrying low-penetrance variants ultimately require these therapies.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that low-penetrance TNFRSF1A variants can be associated with an autoinflammatory phenotype. Although a chronic disease course is rarely observed, some patients ultimately benefit from a biological treatment.     

Side of onset does not influence cognition in newly diagnosed untreated Parkinson's disease patients

BackgroundA relation between the side of motor onset and cognitive impairment in early PD has been reported, suggesting that the asymmetric degeneration affecting subcortical regions may play a pivotal role in lateralized cognitive function. However, evidences are controversial and all previous studies were performed on treated patients, though it is known that dopaminergic therapy can affect cognition in PD.MethodsSixty-nine early untreated PD patients underwent an extensive neuropsychological battery exploring memory, visuospatial and attention/executive functions. Patients were divided with respect of the side of onset (right vs. left) and further grouped according to motor phenotype (tremor vs. rigidity-bradykinesia). Multivariate analysis of variance has been carried out to compare clinical and neuropsychological data between subgroups.ResultsThere were no differences in any neuropsychological task between right-sided and left-sided onset subgroups, irrespective of tremor dominant or rigid-bradykinetic phenotype. Age at onset was significantly higher in patients with any cognitive impairment as compared with patients without (66.7 ± 3.2 vs. 56.3 ± 6.8 years, p = 0.001).ConclusionSide of motor onset is not a major determinant for developing lateralized cognitive deficits in newly diagnosed untreated PD patients.