收费全文 | 7907篇 |
免费 | 473篇 |
国内免费 | 17篇 |
耳鼻咽喉 | 102篇 |
儿科学 | 387篇 |
妇产科学 | 107篇 |
基础医学 | 908篇 |
口腔科学 | 253篇 |
临床医学 | 620篇 |
内科学 | 1759篇 |
皮肤病学 | 188篇 |
神经病学 | 570篇 |
特种医学 | 191篇 |
外科学 | 1083篇 |
综合类 | 213篇 |
一般理论 | 5篇 |
预防医学 | 424篇 |
眼科学 | 251篇 |
药学 | 529篇 |
中国医学 | 60篇 |
肿瘤学 | 747篇 |
2024年 | 23篇 |
2023年 | 51篇 |
2022年 | 118篇 |
2021年 | 300篇 |
2020年 | 146篇 |
2019年 | 213篇 |
2018年 | 232篇 |
2017年 | 159篇 |
2016年 | 194篇 |
2015年 | 223篇 |
2014年 | 319篇 |
2013年 | 412篇 |
2012年 | 576篇 |
2011年 | 572篇 |
2010年 | 318篇 |
2009年 | 260篇 |
2008年 | 370篇 |
2007年 | 377篇 |
2006年 | 350篇 |
2005年 | 334篇 |
2004年 | 321篇 |
2003年 | 294篇 |
2002年 | 274篇 |
2001年 | 173篇 |
2000年 | 179篇 |
1999年 | 169篇 |
1998年 | 86篇 |
1997年 | 69篇 |
1996年 | 51篇 |
1995年 | 60篇 |
1994年 | 48篇 |
1993年 | 36篇 |
1992年 | 111篇 |
1991年 | 90篇 |
1990年 | 91篇 |
1989年 | 97篇 |
1988年 | 80篇 |
1987年 | 69篇 |
1986年 | 58篇 |
1985年 | 56篇 |
1984年 | 50篇 |
1983年 | 44篇 |
1982年 | 25篇 |
1981年 | 24篇 |
1979年 | 45篇 |
1978年 | 28篇 |
1974年 | 24篇 |
1973年 | 24篇 |
1971年 | 19篇 |
1970年 | 22篇 |
Background
Industry payments made to physicians by drug and device manufacturers or group purchasing organizations are now reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as a part of the Physician Payments Sunshine Act. Initial reports from the program show that orthopaedic surgeons lead all physician specialties in total and average industry payments. However, before further discussion of these payments and their implications can take place, it remains to be seen whether these figures are a true reflection of the field of orthopaedic surgery in general, rather than the result of a few outlier physicians in the field. In addition, the nature and sources of these funds should be determined to better inform the national dialogue surrounding these payments.Questions/Purposes
We asked: (1) How do industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons compare with payments to physicians and surgeons in other fields, in terms of median payments and the Gini index of disparity? (2) How much do payments to the highest-receiving orthopaedic surgeons contribute to total payments? (3) What kind of industry payments are orthopaedic surgeons receiving? (4) How much do the highest-paying manufacturers contribute to total payments to orthopaedic surgeons?Materials and Methods
We reviewed the most recent version of the CMS Sunshine Act Open Payments database released on December 19, 2014, containing data on payments made between August 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013. Data on total payments to individual physicians, physician specialty, the types of payments made, and the manufacturers making payments were reviewed. The Gini index of statistical dispersion was calculated for payments made to orthopaedic surgeons and compared with payments made to physicians and surgeons in all other medical specialties. A Gini index of 0 indicates complete equality of payments to everyone in the population, whereas an index of 1 indicates complete inequality, or all income going to one individual.Results
A total of 15,376 orthopaedic surgeons receiving payments during the 5-month period were identified, accounting for USD 109,846,482. The median payment to orthopaedic surgeons receiving payments was USD 121 (interquartile range, USD 34–619). The top 10% of orthopaedic surgeons receiving payments (1538 surgeons) received at least USD 4160 and accounted for 95% of total payments. Royalties and patent licenses accounted for 69% of all industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons.Conclusions
Even as a relatively small specialty, orthopaedic surgeons received substantial payments from industry (more than USD 110 million) during the 5-month study period. Whether there is a true return of value from these payments remains to be seen; however, future ethical and policy discussions regarding industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons should take into account the large disparities in payments that are present and also the nature of the payments being made. It is possible that patients and policymakers may view industry payments to orthopaedic surgeons more positively in light of these new findings.Level of Evidence
Level III, Economic and Decision Analysis. 相似文献Objective
To describe the last 5 years' experience of Child Development Centre (CDC), Kerala Developmental Evaluation Clinic II for children between 2 and 10 y, referred for suspicion of developmental lag in the preschool years and scholastic difficulty in the primary classes with specific focus on developmental profile and the experience of the home based intervention package taught to the mothers.Methods
A team of evaluators including developmental therapist, preschool teacher with special training in clinical child development, speech therapist, special educator, clinical psychologist and developmental pediatrician assessed all the children referred to CDC Kerala. Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST-II), Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS) and Intelligent Quotient (IQ) tests were administered to all children below 6 y and those above 6 with apparent developmental delay.Results
Speech/delay (35.9 %), behavior problem (15.4 %), global delay/ intellectual disability (15.4 %), learning problem (10.9 %), pervasive developmental disorders (7.7 %), seizure disorder (1.7 %), hearing impairment (0.7 %), and visual impairment (0.7 %) were the clinical diagnosis by a developmental pediatrician. Each child with developmental problem was offered a home based intervention package consisting of developmental therapy and special education items, appropriate to the clinical diagnosis of the individual child and the same was taught to the mother.Conclusions
The experience of conducting the developmental evaluation clinic for children between 2 and 10 y has shown that a team consisting of developmental therapist, speech therapist, preschool teacher, special educator, clinical child psychologist and developmental pediatrician, using appropriate test results of the child could make a clinical diagnosis good enough for providing early intervention therapy using a home based intervention package.Objective
To develop a district model for establishing early detection of childhood disability below 6 y of age and to develop appropriate referral linkages for confirmation of the diagnosis and establish home based early intervention therapy to all needy children.Methods
Trained Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) workers conducted the preliminary survey for identifying developmental delay/disability among children below 6 y of age using Trivandrum Developmental Screening Chart (TDSC) (0–6 y) and a team of experts assessed the screen positives in developmental evaluation camps conducted at primary health centres (PHCs).Results
Community survey was carried out and 1,01,438 children below 6 y of age in Thiruvananthapuram district were screened by ASHA workers and 2,477 (2.45 %) positive cases (TDSC two or more item delay) were identified and these children were called for the developmental evaluation camps conducted at 80 PHCs in the district. Among the 1,329 children who reached the evaluation camps 43.1 % were normal. 24.98 % children had speech and language delay and 22.95 % children had multiple disabilities. Developmental delay was observed among 49.89 % children and cerebral palsy in 8.43 % and intellectual disability 16.85 % were confirmed. Visual impairment in 3.31 % and neuromuscular disorders in 1.35 were found among children evaluated in the camp.Conclusions
The results of this district wide early detection of disability survey by trained ASHA workers among children below 6 y of age showed a community prevalence of 3.08 % observed, based on two or more item delay in TDSC and among these children, 43.1 % were normal, 49.89 % had developmental delay, 24.98 % had speech and language delay and 22.95 % had multiple disabilities.Methods: Retrospective case series.
Results: From November 2011 to March 2014, four patients underwent orbital exenteration for fungal orbital cellulitis at the University of Illinois. Three patients had mucormycosis and one had aspergillosis. All patients were treated with intravenous antifungals and underwent orbital exenteration. Two patients were successfully treated with supplemental intra-orbital catheter delivery of amphotericin B. Presenting visual acuity in the affected eye ranged from 20/25 to no light perception. Some level of ophthalmoplegia was present in three patients. Significantly elevated intraocular pressure was found in two patients. All patients with mucormycosis were found to have uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. One patient had a history of myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic hepatitis C infection, polysubstance abuse and Crohn’s disease. Another patient had a history of alcoholic liver cirrhosis, Crohn’s disease treated with systemic immunosuppression and renal cell carcinoma. The patient with aspergillosis had myelodysplastic syndrome and portal hypertension, and the initial presentation resembled giant cell arteritis. Two of four patients died during their hospitalization.
Conclusions: Fungal orbital cellulitis has a high mortality rate despite aggressive antifungal treatment and orbital exenteration performed soon after the diagnosis is confirmed. Patients often have a history of immunosuppression and the onset may be insidious. There must be a high rate of suspicion for fungal orbital cellulitis given the appropriate signs and medical history in order to avoid treatment delay. 相似文献