Alcohol Abuse and De Novo Tumors in Liver Transplantation

Introduction

Organ transplant recipients show an increased incidence of cancer ranging from 4% to 16% owing to several causes: immunosuppression, viral infection, individual predisposition, and so on.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 43/683 (6.3%) recipients of 734 liver transplants performed from November 1991 to November 2008 who experienced a de novo neoplasm.

Conclusion

Alcohol abuse significantly increased the rate of all de novo neoplasms and particularly pharyngogastroesophageal cancers among population of liver transplant recipients. Minimization of immunosuppressive therapy is necessary to reduce the risk of a de novo neoplasm. Strict posttransplant follow-up is required to identify early gastroenteric tumors.     

Liver transplantation using suboptimal grafts: impact of donor harvesting technique.

In recent years, an increasing number of suboptimal grafts has been used to reduce the gap between the supply and demand of organs for liver transplantation (LT). In this randomized prospective study, we tested the impact of donor harvesting technique on the posttransplantation outcome of suboptimal donor livers. A modified double perfusion (MDP) technique (aortic and portal cooling with tourniquet clamping of splenomesenteric vein inflow) was compared with the single aortic perfusion (SAP) technique. Between February and November 2005, 35 suboptimal grafts were randomly assigned to either technique (18 MDP livers and 17 SAP livers). Donor and recipient variables were comparable in the 2 study groups. The SAP group had significantly higher blood transaminases and bilirubin levels after LT. The prevalence of graft primary dysfunction (PDF) was also significantly higher (P=0.01) in the SAP group (35%) than in the MDP group (5%). In 5 cases, all in the SAP group (P=0.02), early re-LT (<30 days) was needed. The 6-month patient and graft survival rates were significantly higher in the MDP (100% in both cases) than in the SAP group (68% and 58%, respectively). The study was stopped in November 2005, when the interim analysis revealed such markedly significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, the present study showed a very low prevalence of PDF, death, and re-LT after transplantation with suboptimal liver when a MDP technique was used to harvest the donor graft.     

Liver transplantation with vena cava in situ and selective use of temporary portacaval shunt or portal clamping

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The recipient hepatectomy with vena cava in situ in liver transplantation has overcome the need of venous-venous bypass thanks to temporary porta caval shunt or portal clamping. METHODOLOGY: 150 orthotopic liver transplants in 137 patients were performed and the vena cava in situ technique was used in 142 (venous bypass in 7, temporary porta caval shunt in 49, portal clamping in 87). The suprahepatic cava veins anastomosis was performed with Belghiti in 97 and piggyback techniques in 45. RESULTS: There were no differences in operative and warm ischemia times nor in blood requirements, while a greater stability of body temperature was documented in the vena cava In Situ group: in the latter temporary porta caval shunt preserved the temperature better than portal clamping (P < 0.01). In anhepatic phase mean artery pressure decreased in veno-venous bypass and increased in the vena cava In situ groups (P < 0.01). The venous return and the cardiac performances (anhepatic phase) were better preserved in the vena cava In Situ group. (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Temporary portal caval shunt or portal clamping and piggyback or Belgiti Techniques allow a better hemodynamic stability through out the procedure, obviating the need for veno-venous bypass or fluid overload, if selectively used.     

Intention-to-Treat Analysis of Liver Transplantation in Selected, Aggressively Treated HCC Patients Exceeding the Milan Criteria

This prospective study analyzed the dropout probability and intention-to-treat survival rates of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) selected and treated according to our policy before liver transplantation (LT), with particular attention to those exceeding the Milan criteria. Exclusion criteria for LT were macroscopic vascular invasion, metastases, and poorly differentiated disease at percutaneous biopsy. A specific multi-modal adjuvant algorithm was used to treat HCC before LT. A total of 100 HCC patients were listed for LT: 40 exceeded the Milan criteria in terms of nodule size and number (MILAN OUT) either at listing or in list, while 60 patients continued to meet the criteria (MILAN IN). The Milan criteria did not prove to be a significant predictor of dropout probability or survival rates using Cox's analysis. Cumulative dropout probability at 6 and 12 months was 0% and 4% for MILAN OUT, and 6% and 11% for MILAN IN. The intention-to-treat survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 95% and 85% in MILAN OUT, and 84% and 69% in MILAN IN. None of the 68 transplanted patients had recurrent HCC after a median 16-month follow-up (0-69 months). In conclusion, LT may be effective for selected, aggressively-treated HCC patients exceeding the Milan criteria.     

Combined liver and kidney transplantation: analysis of Padova experience

BACKGROUND/AIM: The main indications for combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) are as follows: (1) cirrhosis with renal damage dependent or not upon liver disease, (2) renal failure with dialysis and concomitant liver end-stage disease, (3) congenital diseases, and (4) enzymatic liver deficiency with concomitant renal failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate our results with CLKT both in adult and pediatric patients. METHODS: From September 1995 to September 2006, 15 CLKT (2.8%) among 541 liver transplantations included 4 pediatric patients (27%). The main indications for CLKT were hepatitis C virus (HCV) and polycystic diseases in adult patients, and primary hyperoxaluria in pediatric patients. RESULTS: The double transplantation was performed from the same donor in all cases. All adult patients received whole liver grafts, whereas 3 split transplants and 1 whole liver graft were transplanted in the pediatric patients. Median liver and kidney cold ischemia times were 468 and 675 minutes, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 1-125), the overall survival rate was 80%. Five-year patient and graft survival rates were 100% for adult CLKT, whereas they were 50% for pediatric patients. We observed only 2 cases (18%) of delayed renal function, requiring temporary hemodialysis with progressive graft improvement. There was only 1 case of kidney retransplantation due to early graft nonfunction in a pediatric patient. CONCLUSION: Although CLKT is related to major surgical risks, results after transplantation are satisfactory with an evident immunological advantage.     

Liver Resection Associated With Mini Porto-Caval Shunt as Salvage Treatment in Patients With Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Before Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

Tumor progression before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the main cause of dropouts from waiting lists among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Performing a porto-caval shunt (PCS) before parenchymal liver transection has the potential to allow an extended hepatectomy in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis, reducing portal hyperflow and therefore the sinusoidal shear-stress on the remnant liver. We report the case of a 59-year-old man affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh score presentation, C-10; Model for End Stage Liver Disease score, 18) and HCC (2 lesions of 2 and 2.8 cm). The patient began the evaluation to join the OLT waiting list, but, in the 3 months required to complete the evaluation, he developed tumor progression: 3 HCC lesions, the largest 1 with a diameter of about 4.4 cm. These findings excluded transplantation criteria and the patient was referred to our center. After appropriate preoperative studies, the patient underwent a major liver resection (trisegmentectomy) after side-to-side PCS by interposition of an iliac vein graft from a cadaveric donor. The patient overcame the worsened severity of cirrhosis. After 6 months of follow-up, he developed 2 other HCC nodules. He was then included on the waiting list at our center, undergoing OLT from a cadaveric donor at 8 months after salvage treatment. At 36 months after OLT, he is alive and free from HCC recurrence. Associating a partial side-to-side PCS with hepatic resection may represent a potential salvage therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and HCC progression beyond listing criteria for OLT.