Does ablation of atrial fibrillation at the time of septal myectomy improve survival of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?

ObjectiveTo evaluate the outcomes after septal myectomy in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy according to atrial fibrillation and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe reviewed patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who underwent septal myectomy at the Mayo Clinic from 2001 to 2016. History of atrial fibrillation was obtained from patient histories and electrocardiograms. All-cause mortality was the primary end point.ResultsA total of 2023 patients underwent septal myectomy, of whom 394 (19.5%) had at least 1 episode of atrial fibrillation preoperatively. Among patients with atrial fibrillation, 76 (19.3%) had only 1 known episode, 278 (70.6%) had recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and 40 (10.2%) had persistent atrial fibrillation. Surgical ablation was performed in 190 patients at the time of septal myectomy, including 148 with pulmonary vein isolation and 42 with the classic maze procedure. Among all patients, operative mortality was 0.4%, and there were no early deaths in patients undergoing surgical ablation. Over a median follow-up of 5.6 years, patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation had increased mortality (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.91; P = .070) after multivariable adjustment for comorbidities. When considering the impact of atrial fibrillation with or without surgical treatment, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in patients undergoing ablation compared with no ablation was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.69; P = .824).ConclusionsAtrial fibrillation is present preoperatively in one-fifth of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy undergoing myectomy and showed a trend toward higher all-cause mortality. Survival of patients undergoing septal myectomy with preoperative atrial fibrillation was similar between those who did and did not receive concomitant surgical ablation.     

Evaluation of DISORDER: Retrospective Image Motion Correction for Volumetric Brain MRI in a Pediatric Setting

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Head motion causes image degradation in brain MR imaging examinations, negatively impacting image quality, especially in pediatric populations. Here, we used a retrospective motion correction technique in children and assessed image quality improvement for 3D MR imaging acquisitions.MATERIALS AND METHODS:We prospectively acquired brain MR imaging at 3T using 3D sequences, T1-weighted MPRAGE, T2-weighted TSE, and FLAIR in 32 unsedated children, including 7 with epilepsy (age range, 2–18 years). We implemented a novel motion correction technique through a modification of k-space data acquisition: Distributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring by using Encoding Redundancy (DISORDER). For each participant and technique, we obtained 3 reconstructions as acquired (Aq), after DISORDER motion correction (Di), and Di with additional outlier rejection (DiOut). We analyzed 288 images quantitatively, measuring 2 objective no-reference image quality metrics: gradient entropy (GE) and MPRAGE white matter (WM) homogeneity. As a qualitative metric, we presented blinded and randomized images to 2 expert neuroradiologists who scored them for clinical readability.RESULTS:Both image quality metrics improved after motion correction for all modalities, and improvement correlated with the amount of intrascan motion. Neuroradiologists also considered the motion corrected images as of higher quality (Wilcoxon z = −3.164 for MPRAGE; z = −2.066 for TSE; z = −2.645 for FLAIR; all P < .05).CONCLUSIONS:Retrospective image motion correction with DISORDER increased image quality both from an objective and qualitative perspective. In 75% of sessions, at least 1 sequence was improved by this approach, indicating the benefit of this technique in unsedated children for both clinical and research environments.

Head motion is a common cause of image degradation in brain MR imaging. Motion artifacts negatively impact MR image quality and therefore radiologists’ capacity to read the images, ultimately affecting patient clinical care.¹ Motion artifacts are more common in noncompliant patients,² but even in compliant adults, intrascan movement is reported in at least 10% of cases.³ For children who require high-resolution MR images, obtaining optimal image quality can be challenging, owing to the requirement to stay still over long durations needed for acquisition.⁴ Sedation can be an option, but it carries higher risks, costs, and preparation and recovery time.⁵In conditions such as intractable focal epilepsy, identification of an epileptogenic lesion is clinically important to guide surgical treatment. However, these lesions can be visually subtle, particularly in children in whom subtle cortical dysplasias are more common.⁶ Dedicated epilepsy MR imaging protocols use high-resolution 3D sequences to allow better cortical definition and free reformatting of orientation but involve acquisition times in the order of minutes, so data collection becomes more sensitive to motion.⁷For children in particular, multiple strategies are available for minimizing motion during MR examinations. Collaboration with play specialists using mock scanners and training or projecting a cartoon are good approaches to reduce anxiety.^8,9 These tools are not always available in clinical radiology and, even with these strategies, motion can still be an issue.¹⁰ Different scanning approaches to correct for intrascan motion have been proposed. Broadly, prospective methods track head motion in real time and modify the acquisition directions accordingly.¹¹ These approaches are applicable to a wide range of sequences but require optical systems with external tracking markers, sometimes uncomfortable or impractical, and extra setup can ultimately result in longer examinations. Furthermore, these approaches may also not be robust to continuous motion.^11-13 Retrospective techniques have also been proposed, in some cases relying on imaging navigators that are not compatible with all standard sequences or contrasts.¹²Here, we use a more general retrospective motion correction technique: Distributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring by using Encoding Redundancy (DISORDER). In this method, k-space samples are reordered to enable retrospective motion correction during image reconstruction.¹⁴ Our hypothesis is that DISORDER improves clinical MR imaging quality and readability. To assess its use for clinical sequences, we acquired a dedicated epilepsy MR imaging protocol in 32 children across a wide age range. We used both objective image quality metrics and expert neuroradiologist ratings to evaluate the outcome after motion correction.     

Treatment Experiences,Information Needs,Pain and Quality of Life in Men with Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer: Results from the EXTREQOL Study

Aims

Delaying progression, ameliorating symptoms and maintaining quality of life (QoL) are primary aims of treatment for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Real-world rather than clinical trial data about symptoms and side-effects are sparse. In EXTREQOL, patients' QoL, pain and information needs were recorded during treatment.

Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Children: A UK Multicentre Review and Review of the Literature

Aims

To obtain an overview of the management and outcomes of children aged 18 years or younger diagnosed with differentiated thyroid carcinoma of follicular cell origin across the UK, by collecting and analysing data from the limited number of centres treating these patients. This multicentre data might provide a more realistic perspective than single-institution series.

Association of Multiple Plasma Biomarker Concentrations with Progression of Prevalent Diabetic Kidney Disease: Findings from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study

Open in a separate window