Preclinical Development of Cell-Based Products: a European Regulatory Science Perspective

Purpose

This article describes preclinical development of cell-based medicinal products for European markets and discusses European regulatory mechanisms open to developers to aid successful product development. Cell-based medicinal products are diverse, including cells that are autologous or allogeneic, have been genetically modified, or not, or expanded ex vivo, and applied systemically or to an anatomical site different to that of their origin; comments applicable to one product may not be applicable to others, so bespoke development is needed, for all elements - quality, preclinical and clinical.

Methods

After establishing how the product is produced, proof of potential for therapeutic efficacy, and then safety, of the product need to be determined. This includes understanding biodistribution, persistence and toxicity, including potential for malignant transformation. These elements need to be considered in the context of the intended clinical development.

Results

This article describes regulatory mechanisms available to developers to support product development that aim to resolve scientific issues prior to marketing authorization application, to enable patients to have faster access to the product than would otherwise be the case.

Conclusions

Developers are encouraged to be aware of both the scientific issues and regulatory mechanisms to ensure patients can be supplied with these products.

     

Empirical treatment of lower urinary tract infections in the face of spreading multidrug resistance: in vitro study on the effectiveness of nitroxoline

The spread of antimicrobial resistance challenges the empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Among others, nitrofurantoin is recommended for first-line treatment, but acceptance among clinicians is limited due to chronic nitrofurantoin-induced lung toxicity and insufficient coverage of Enterobacteriaceae other than Escherichia coli. Nitroxoline appears to be an alternative to nitrofurantoin owing to its favourable safety profile, however data on its current in vitro susceptibility are sparse. In this study, susceptibility to nitroxoline was tested against 3012 urinary clinical isolates (including multidrug-resistant bacteria and Candida spp.) by disk diffusion test and/or broth microdilution. At least 91% of all Gram-negatives (n?=?2000), Gram-positives (n?=?403) and yeasts (n?=?132) had inhibition zone diameters for nitroxoline ≥18?mm. Except for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, nitroxoline MIC₉₀ values were ≤16?mg/L and were 2- to >16-fold lower compared with nitrofurantoin. In extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), MIC₉₀ values of nitroxoline were two-fold higher compared with non-ESBL-producing enterobacteria and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). The in vitro efficacies of nitroxoline and nitrofurantoin against ATCC strains of E. coli, Enterococcus faecalis and Proteus mirabilis were compared by time–kill curves in Mueller–Hinton broth and artificial urine. Nitroxoline was non-inferior against E. coli, P. mirabilis and E. faecalis in artificial urine. In conclusion, nitroxoline showed a broad antimicrobial spectrum, with inhibition zone diameters and MICs of nitroxoline well below the EUCAST breakpoint for E. coli for most organisms, and thus may also be a target for therapy of uncomplicated UTIs.     

Application of prioritization approaches to optimize environmental monitoring and testing of pharmaceuticals

Pharmaceuticals are ubiquitous in the natural environment with concentrations expected to rise as human population increases. Environmental risk assessments are available for a small portion of pharmaceuticals in use, raising concerns over the potential risks posed by other drugs that have little or no data. With >1900 active pharmaceutical ingredients in use, it would be a major task to test all of the compounds with little or no data. Desk-based prioritization studies provide a potential solution by identifying those substances that are likely to pose the greatest risk to the environment and which, therefore, need to be considered a priority for further study. The aim of this review was to (1) provide an overview of different prioritization exercises performed for pharmaceuticals in the environment and the results obtained; and (2) propose a new holistic risk-based prioritization framework for drugs in the environment. The suggested models to underpin this framework are discussed in terms of validity and applicability. The availability of data required to run the models was assessed and data gaps identified. The implementation of this framework may harmonize pharmaceutical prioritization efforts and ensure that, in the future, experimental resources are focused on molecules, endpoints, and environmental compartments that are biologically relevant.