Severe disruptive vocalizers

OBJECTIVES: To describe the most severe disruptive vocalizers in nursing facilities, in regard to their clinical and behavioral characteristics, staff responses, and treatments used, and to report on their prognosis over 6 months. DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: One hundred seven skilled nursing facilities. PARTICIPANTS: The 203 residents who were among the two most disruptive vocalizers in their respective facilities and who vocalized at least 2 hours a day. MEASUREMENTS: Telephone interviews of licensed nursing staff who cared for the subjects, conducted at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months. Data gathered included subject demographics, physical function, diagnoses, medication and restraint use, behavioral problems, vocalization characteristics, treatments used, and status at follow-up. RESULTS: Subjects tended to have dementia, to be dependent in most activities of daily living, to have multiple medical problems, to be physically restrained (48%), and to be taking psychotropic medication (76%). Nearly all (95%) were audible at least 50 feet away, with loudness associated with more severe cognitive impairment (OR 4.90, P = .001). When subjects who primarily made nonverbal noises ("screamers") were compared with those whose predominant expressions were words ("talkers"), hearing impairment, severe cognitive impairment, and greater dependency in activities of daily living characterized the screamers. Staff reported trying a variety of treatments with all subjects, often with little success. Two months after enrollment, 66% of surviving subjects vocalized fewer hours than at baseline, and 45% were rated as improved. Independent predictors of improvement included greater ADL independence, hearing and vision problems, shorter length of stay, urinary incontinence, and use of a treatment other than one-on-one interventions. Nearly one-quarter of subjects (23.4%) died within 6 months. Baseline factors associated independently with a higher probability of death included age, use of activity intervention, physical abusiveness, and absence of wandering. CONCLUSION: Severe disruptive vocalization is associated with severe cognitive and physical impairment and with a high probability of mortality within 6 months. Subcategorization of severe vocalizers by vocalization type or other associated factors may be useful for prognostic and treatment purposes.     

Life Support Courses: Are They Effective?

Study objective: To determine the effectiveness of life support courses for health care providers on the basis of one of three outcomes: (1) patient mortality and morbidity, (2) retention of knowledge or skills, and (3) change in practice behavior. Methods: English-language articles from 1975 to 1992 were identified through MEDLINE and ERIC searches, bibliographies of articles, and current abstracts. Studies were considered relevant if they included a study population of life support providers, an intervention of any of the identified life support courses, and assessment of at least one of the three listed outcomes. Relevant studies were selected and validity scores were assigned to them by agreement of two independent reviewers, using a structured form to assess validity. Data on setting, methods, participants, intervention, and outcomes were then abstracted and verified. Results: Seventeen of 67 identified studies pertaining to life support courses met the inclusion criteria. (1) All three mortality and morbidity studies indicated a positive impact, with an overall odds ratio of .28 (95% confidence interval [CI], .22 to .37). (2) No net increase in scores was found in 5 of 8 studies of retention of knowledge and in 8 of 9 studies of skills retention. Two of three studies reporting refresher activities yielded positive effects on knowledge retention. Outcomes were not significantly different between groups taught with modular or didactic techniques. (3) Studies assessing behavioral outcome were methodologically weak. Conclusion: Among providers, retention of knowledge and skills acquired by participation in support courses is poor. However, refresher activities increase knowledge retention. Modular courses are as good as lectures for learning course material. There is evidence that use of the Advanced Trauma Life Support course has decreased mortality and morbidity. Further studies of patient outcome and provider behaviors are warranted. [Jabbour M, Osmond MH, Klassen TP: Life support courses: Are they effective? Ann Emerg Med December 1996;28:690-698.]     

Multimorbidity and Evidence Generation

Most people with a chronic disease actually have more than one, a condition known as multimorbidity. Despite this, the evidence base to prevent adverse disease outcomes has taken a disease-specific approach. Drawing on a conference, Improving Guidelines for Multimorbid Patients, the goal of this paper is to identify challenges to the generation of evidence to support the care of people with multimorbidity and to make recommendations for improvement. We identified three broad categories of challenges: 1) challenges to defining and measuring multimorbidity; 2) challenges related to the effects of multimorbidity on study design, implementation and analysis; and 3) challenges inherent in studying heterogeneity of treatment effects in patients with differing comorbid conditions. We propose a set of recommendations for consideration by investigators and others (reviewers, editors, funding agencies, policymaking organizations) involved in the creation of evidence for this common type of person that address each of these challenges. The recommendations reflect a general approach that emphasizes broader inclusion (recruitment and retention) of patients with multimorbidity, coupled with more rigorous efforts to measure comorbidity and comorbidity burden and the influence of multimorbidity on outcomes and the effects of therapy. More rigorous examination of heterogeneity of treatment effects requires careful attention to prioritizing the most important comorbid-related questions, and also requires studies that provide greater statistical power than conventional trials have provided. Relatively modest changes in the orientation of current research along these lines can be helpful in pointing to and partially addressing selected knowledge gaps. However, producing a robust evidence base to support patient-centered decision making in complex individuals with multimorbidity, exposed to many different combinations of potentially interacting factors that can modify the risks and benefits of therapies, is likely to require a clinical research enterprise fundamentally restructured to be more fully integrated with routine clinical practice.