Tinkering and tailoring individual consultations: how practice nurses try to make cardiovascular risk communication meaningful

Aims and objectives. To explore the perspectives of practice nurses in their role of communicating cardiovascular risk to patients. Background. Nurses in primary care have for some time been engaged in cardiovascular risk discussions with patients. With the recent introduction of the NHS Health Checks, the focus on this work is set to increase. Design. Qualitative using a framework approach. Methods. Two focus groups and 16 semi-structured interviews were conducted with nurses purposively sampled from those working in primary care. Results. The nurses' accounts revealed the need to develop a relationship of trust and establish a level of relevance with each individual patient whilst discussing cardiovascular risk. Potential aspects of these discussions were as follows: working within a highly structured data-collecting task; time constraints and consideration of the individual's context. We used the idea of tailoring to describe how nurses navigate and constantly modify and pitch their approach for each patient they see in response to these constraints. Conclusion. We suggest that in order for risk to be made meaningful to patients, practice nurses recognise the need for such information to be embedded in the more reciprocal dynamics of nurse-patient consultations. From their perspective, success is often as much about not saying something, or saying it in a particular way, as saying anything accurately or consistently. Relevance to clinical practice. For practice nurses to be instrumental in the successful delivery of health prevention policy initiatives such as the NHS Health Checks, it is important to acknowledge their views and perspectives in undertaking this work. This study suggests that the nurses recognised the need for further skills and a refinement of approach for those health professionals involved.     

Group cognitive behavioural therapy for first episode psychosis: who's referred,who attends and who completes it?

Aim: Most national guidelines recommend psychological therapy for people with first‐episode psychosis (FEP) but interventions proven effective in randomized control trials (RCTs) conducted in research settings do not always translate effectively to real‐world clinical environments. In a limited health system, it is important to understand the system and patient barriers to participation in effective treatment. We sought to determine what patient characteristics influenced clinicians' decision to refer or not to refer to group cognitive behavioural therapy for FEP and what characteristics were associated with those referred attending/not attending and adhering/not adhering to the programme. Methods: Between 2006 and 2008, all cases of confirmed FEP from a defined geographical region were examined using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV‐TR Axis I Disorders for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM‐IV) diagnoses, the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia and Birchwood Insight Scale. Duration of untreated psychosis was established using the Beiser Scale. Results: Of the 124 (77 males, 47 females) people in the final sample, 88 (72%) were referred for cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), 52 (59%) attended and 12 (23%) did not complete CBT. Those with higher levels of insight into the need for treatment (U = 740.00, z = −2.63, P = 0.008) and higher levels of positive symptoms (t (120) = −3.064, P = 0.003) were more likely to be referred to CBT. Those with higher educational attainment (χ² = 9.48, P = 0.03) and fewer negative symptoms, particularly in relation to global attention (t (85) = 2.32, P = 0.03), were more likely to attend and complete CBT. Conclusion: Within an early intervention service for FEP, it appears that individuals with less education, more negative symptoms and less insight experienced significant barriers to successfully completing group CBT. More information for referring clinicians about the benefits of CBT for FEP could help increase referral rates. Assertive outreach for people at risk of disengaging or non‐adherence should also be considered.     

The role of patient–provider sexual health communication in understanding the uptake of HIV prevention services among Black men who have sex with men

We examined factors that may be associated with whether Black men who have sex with men a) disclose their sexual orientation to healthcare providers, and b) discuss their sexual health with healthcare providers to inform interventions to improve HIV prevention efforts and reduce HIV incidence rates among Black men who have sex with men. During 2011–2012, we conducted semi-structured individual in-depth interviews with Black men who have sex with men in New York City. Interviews were audio recorded. We examined transcribed responses for main themes using a qualitative exploratory approach followed by computer-assisted thematic analyses. Twenty-nine men participated. The median age was 25.3 years; 41% (n = 12) earned an annual income of < US$10,000; 72% (n = 21) had a college degree; 86% (n = 25) reported being single; 69% (n = 20) self-identified as gay or homosexual. We identified three main themes affecting whether the men discussed their sexual orientation and sexual health with healthcare providers: 1) comfort discussing sexual health needs; 2) health literacy; and 3) trust. Identifying strategies for improved comfort, health literacy and trust between Black men who have sex with men and healthcare providers may be an important strategy for increasing sexual health patient–provider communications, increasing opportunities for HIV prevention including testing and reducing HIV-related health disparities.