Linezolid versus ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime in patients hospitalized for the treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae pneumonia

Intravenous (i.v.) to oral linezolid (600 mg twice daily for both, with optional aztreonam) and a cephalosporin regimen (i.v. ceftriaxone 1 g twice daily followed by oral cefpodoxime 200 mg twice daily) were compared for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with emphasis on patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae. This multicenter, randomized, open-label trial was conducted in 27 countries in 6 continents. Efficacy was assessed 12-28 d following treatment. Clinical and laboratory safety assessments were evaluated; isolates for microbiologic assessments were identified primarily by sputum or blood culture. In all treated patients (linezolid, n = 381; ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime, n = 366), linezolid had a higher clinical cure rate than ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime (83.0% vs. 76.4%, respectively; p = 0.040). S. pneumoniae was isolated in 73.2% (186/254) of patients at baseline, with similar eradication rates in the linezolid and ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime groups (88.7% vs. 89.9%, respectively; p = 0.830). Linezolid had a superior clinical cure rate (93.1% vs. 68.2%; p = 0.021) in patients with S. pneumoniae bacteremia. Logistic regression analyses revealed that linezolid-treated patients with bacteremia, pleural effusion, cardiac comorbidities, diabetes or abnormal white blood cell counts had significantly better outcomes than cephalosporin-treated patients. Both regimens were well tolerated, although the incidence of drug-related adverse events was higher in the linezolid group than in the ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime group (21.3% vs. 11.2%, respectively; p = 0.0002). In summary, empiric i.v./oral linezolid was more effective than ceftriaxone/cefpodoxime in patients hospitalized with CAP, with comparable cure rates in S. pneumoniae pneumonia and higher cure rates in pneumonia complicated by bacteremia.     

Evaluation of a "nondieting" stress reduction program for overweight women: a randomized trial

PURPOSE: Determine if a "nondieting" intervention focused on intensive training in eliciting the relaxation response enhances health outcomes compared with nondieting interventions without such training. DESIGN: Randomized trial with follow-up at 10 weeks, 4 months, and 12 months. SETTING: General community. SUBJECTS: Total of 225 overweight and obese women with at least one other cardiovascular risk factor. INTERVENTIONS: Three 10-week nondieting interventions: a group program (P1) focused on intensive training in techniques for eliciting the relaxation response (n = 60), a group program (P2) focused on healthy eating and physical activity (n = 61), and a self-guided, mail-delivered version of P2 (P3; n = 101). MEASURES: The Revised Symptom Checklist measured psychological distress, the Medical Symptoms Checklist measured the experience of medical symptoms, and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile measured a range of lifestyle behaviors. Self-efficacy for low-fat eating intuitive eating, and body mass index were also assessed. ANALYSIS: An intention-to-treat analysis was used. RESULTS: At 12 months, P1 produced statistically greater improvements in stress management behaviors and medical symptom discomfort and was the only program to significantly improve self-efficacy for low-fat eating. In P1, the effect sizes for reductions in depression (0.75) and interpersonal sensitivity (0.85) were large. At 12 months, mean weight was unchanged. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of intensive relaxation response training in a nondieting program for overweight women enhanced stress management and medical symptoms outcomes but not weight outcomes.     

In-111-labeled white blood cell uptake in noninfected closed fracture in humans: prospective study

Since indium-111 white blood cell (In-111 WBC) scintigraphy is often used to evaluate for osteomyelitis in bone fractures, it is important to know if noninfected fractures have In-111 WBC uptake. Twenty-seven noninfected closed fracture sites in 19 patients were prospectively evaluated with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy and In-111 WBC scintigraphy. In-111 WBC uptake was present in 41% of the 27 sites. In the 11 positive sites, the In-111 WBC uptake was 1+ (definite but minimal) in 55%, 2+ (moderate) in 36%, and 3+ (marked) in 9%. The visual intensity of the radioactive uptake on In-111 WBC scintigrams relative to that on bone scintigrams was less in 82%, equal in 9%, and greater in 9%. The visual size of the area of uptake on In-111 WBC scintigrams and bone scintigrams was smaller in 36%, equal in 55%, and greater in 9%. Factors that may help distinction of In-111 WBC uptake due to fracture alone from infection associated with fracture are discussed.     

Apolipoprotein E4 allele presence and functional outcome after severe traumatic brain injury

Presence of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) 4 allele has been associated with increased incidence and faster progression of neurodegenerative diseases, poorer recovery from neurologic insult, and decreased cognitive function in the well-elderly. The specific association between APOE genotype and recovery from severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is conflicting with many groups finding the APOE 4 allele to be associated with poorer outcome while others have found no association. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between APOE 4 allele presence and recovery during the two years after injury from severe TBI in light of other potential covariates, such as age, race, gender, hypotension or hypoxia before hospital admission and severity of injury. APOE genotype was determined for 123 subjects with severe TBI. Glasgow outcome score (GOS) and mortality were collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. Results showed individuals improved over the two year period following injury and those with the 4 allele had a slower recovery rate than those without the APOE 4 allele over the two year period. We did not however find significant differences in GOS at individual time points when controlling for other covariates. Our findings suggest that APOE 4 allele presence influences recovery rate from severe TBI independent of other covariates. The findings of this study are unique in that they address not only the relationship between APOE 4 allele presence and outcome from severe TBI, but also describe differences in trajectory of recovery by APOE 4 allele presence.