Pain after barium enema: effect of CO2 and air on double-contrast study

One hundred fifty-one consecutive patients scheduled for double-contrast barium enema studies were assigned randomly to insufflation with either air or carbon dioxide (CO2) in a double-blind, prospective trial. Within 24 hours after the enema study, the patients were contacted by telephone by an interviewer, who completed a standard questionnaire. Radiographs from the enema studies were assessed for quality by two radiologists. Pain experienced after the procedure was graded from 0 (none) to 4 (severe). Clinically relevant (grades 2-4) pain was experienced by 30% of patients after insufflation with room air, compared with 11% of patients in whom CO2 was used for insufflation (P = .005). The mean pain score for CO2 was 0.4, and for room air, 1.2 (P less than .005). Although five patients experienced grade 4 pain after insufflation with air, no patient reported severe pain after CO2 insufflation. Post-evacuation films confirmed there was significantly less residual gas in the CO2 group. The quality of radiographs was equal in the two groups. CO2 has advantages for use in the double-contrast barium enema examination.     

Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines

British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) is pleased to publish a new set of guidelines for reporting research involving animals, simultaneously with several other journals; the ‘ARRIVE’ guidelines (Animals in Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments). This editorial summarizes the background to the guidelines, gives our view of their significance, considers aspects of specific relevance to pharmacology, re-states BJP''s guidelines for authors on animal experiments and indicates our commitment to carrying on discussion of this important topic. We also invite feedback via the British Pharmacological Society website.