Identification of natural antibodies to interleukin-18 in the sera of normal humans and three nonhuman primate species

Natural antibodies to cytokines can be found in the sera of normal healthy individuals in the absence of specific immunostimulation. However, the function, impact, and purpose of natural antibody development have yet to be fully elucidated. Interleukin (IL)-18 is a cytokine that exerts proinflammatory activities and induces natural killer (NK) cell activity. Recombinant human IL-18 (rHuIL-18) is currently in development as a cancer immunotherapy. In this study, the presence of natural antibodies to IL-18 in the sera of normal humans and three nonhuman primate species was evaluated by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Of the human sera tested, 6 of 47 samples were positive for natural antibodies to IL-18. Of the nonhuman primate sera tested, 22 of 80 cynomolgus monkey samples, 4 of 31 rhesus monkey samples, and 2 of 20 chimpanzee samples were positive for natural antibodies to IL-18. Natural anti-IL-18 antibodies were neutralizing in 5 of 22 cynomolgus and 2 of 4 rhesus sera. None of the chimpanzee or human sera were able to neutralize IL-18 induction of interferon (IFN)-gamma in vitro. In vivo activity of rHuIL-18 was compared in IL-18 natural antibody-positive and -negative cynomolgus monkeys. The presence of natural antibodies to IL-18 did not alter rHuIL-18 systemic exposure levels, induction of neopterin, or induction of treatment-induced antibodies following intravenous administration of rHuIL-18. In conclusion, our data indicate that, as has been found with other cytokines, natural anti-IL-18 antibodies are relatively common. Moreover, natural anti-IL-18 antibodies do not appear to influence rHuIL-18 activity in vivo and are not predictive of a heightened immune response, suggesting that natural anti-IL-18 antibodies do not impact IL-18 therapy. Finally, our data suggest that the ability to detect natural anti-cytokine antibodies may be a useful measure of the adequacy of an assay for deployment in clinical trials.     

Laparoscopic Splenectomy

Splenectomy is a powerful tool for treatment of hematologic disease, with 70% to 90% of patients achieving long-term improvement. In recent years laparoscopic splenectomy has gained acceptance as a viable alternative to open splenectomy. This review summarizes the indications for laparoscopic splenectomy, the operative techniques, and the most recent results. Laparoscopic splenectomy is evolving and may become the standard operative method for the treatment of the problem spleen.     

One hospital's experience with a "Do not resuscitate" policy.

A "No not resuscitate" policy was instituted at McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, in January 1979. Its objectives were to ensure that physicians decide on the appropriateness of resuscitation attempts before they might be needed; to have each physician consult his or her patients, or the families of incompetent patients, to determine their wishes concerning further treatment; and to provide legal protection of or physicians and the hospital in regard to the policy. To determine the effectiveness of the "Do not resuscitate" policy a questionnaire was sent to a sample of the professional staff of the hospital; the overall response rate was 87%. The respondents felt that a better way of informing hospital staff of the policy and its objectives was needed. However, the results of the questionnaire suggested that, on the whole, the policy was perceived as beneficial to both patients and physicians at the hospital.     

Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual scientific meetings: How does the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists compare?

The abstract to publication ratio (APR) is a measure of the quality of scientific meetings. The aim of the present study was to determine the publication rate of abstracts presented at annual Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) conferences, and to identify the publishing journals. All free paper research abstracts (oral or poster) presented by RANZCR radiologists, radiation oncologists and trainees at the four consecutive meetings between 1996 and 1999 were identified retrospectively from conference programmes. The PubMed database ( http:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.govPubMed ) was searched to determine whether or not the abstract had been published as a full paper. Of the 480 free paper research abstracts, 168 (35%) had been published as full articles. The overall abstract to publication ratio for radiology was 29% and for radiation oncology was 41%. Papers were published in a variety of journals but Australasian Radiology accounted for 27%. The mean time between presentation and publication was 16.5 months (median 17 months). These overall abstract to publication ratios are lower than those reported for overseas‐based meetings in each respective area. Guidelines to scientific committees could increase the APR by more rigorous selection of abstracts. Future research should look at barriers to the publication of research findings, and identify ways to assist the publication process.     

Randomized placebo-controlled study of low-dose warfarin for the prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we studied whether warfarin 1 mg daily reduces the incidence of symptomatic central venous catheter (CVC) -associated thrombosis in patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five patients with cancer who required a CVC for at least 7 days were randomly assigned to receive warfarin 1 mg or placebo. RESULTS: There were 11 (4.3%) symptomatic CVC-associated thromboses among 255 patients, with no difference in the incidence of symptomatic CVC-associated thrombosis between patients taking warfarin 1 mg daily (six of 130 patients; 4.6%) and patients taking placebo (five of 125 patients; 4.0%; hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.37 to 3.94). Warfarin had no effect on CVC life span (84 days v 63 days in control and warfarin groups, respectively; 95% confidence limit, -16 to 55 days; P = .09), and it did not affect the number of premature CVC removals (23.2% v 25.4% in control and warfarin groups, respectively; 95% confidence limit of difference -8.34 to 12.71; P = .68) or the frequency of major bleeding episodes (2% v 0% in control and warfarin groups, respectively; P = .5, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: Symptomatic CVC-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer, although significant, is less common than previously reported. In this study, the administration of warfarin 1 mg daily did not reduce the incidence of symptomatic CVC-associated thrombosis in patients with cancer. However, the low rate of symptomatic CVC-associated thrombosis means that a much larger trial is required to address this issue definitively.