收费全文 | 5726篇 |
免费 | 426篇 |
国内免费 | 42篇 |
耳鼻咽喉 | 54篇 |
儿科学 | 186篇 |
妇产科学 | 177篇 |
基础医学 | 740篇 |
口腔科学 | 62篇 |
临床医学 | 633篇 |
内科学 | 1300篇 |
皮肤病学 | 131篇 |
神经病学 | 581篇 |
特种医学 | 193篇 |
外科学 | 856篇 |
综合类 | 65篇 |
一般理论 | 6篇 |
预防医学 | 522篇 |
眼科学 | 53篇 |
药学 | 401篇 |
中国医学 | 11篇 |
肿瘤学 | 223篇 |
2023年 | 49篇 |
2022年 | 53篇 |
2021年 | 87篇 |
2020年 | 89篇 |
2019年 | 101篇 |
2018年 | 112篇 |
2017年 | 97篇 |
2016年 | 101篇 |
2015年 | 112篇 |
2014年 | 126篇 |
2013年 | 237篇 |
2012年 | 301篇 |
2011年 | 278篇 |
2010年 | 160篇 |
2009年 | 153篇 |
2008年 | 273篇 |
2007年 | 295篇 |
2006年 | 260篇 |
2005年 | 199篇 |
2004年 | 201篇 |
2003年 | 165篇 |
2002年 | 166篇 |
2001年 | 162篇 |
2000年 | 174篇 |
1999年 | 160篇 |
1998年 | 61篇 |
1997年 | 65篇 |
1996年 | 62篇 |
1995年 | 45篇 |
1994年 | 63篇 |
1993年 | 57篇 |
1992年 | 147篇 |
1991年 | 129篇 |
1990年 | 128篇 |
1989年 | 130篇 |
1988年 | 118篇 |
1987年 | 114篇 |
1986年 | 114篇 |
1985年 | 95篇 |
1984年 | 88篇 |
1983年 | 69篇 |
1982年 | 46篇 |
1981年 | 41篇 |
1979年 | 39篇 |
1978年 | 41篇 |
1977年 | 41篇 |
1975年 | 49篇 |
1974年 | 39篇 |
1973年 | 39篇 |
1972年 | 40篇 |
Objective:
To investigate reproducibility of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake on 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MR scans in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).Methods:
30 patients with HNSCC were included in this prospective study. The patients were scanned twice before radiotherapy treatment with both PET/CT and PET/MR. Patients were scanned on the same scanners, 3 days apart and according to the same protocol. Metabolic tumour activity was measured by the maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVpeak, respectively), and total lesion glycolysis from the metabolic tumour volume defined from ≥50% SUVmax. Bland–Altman analysis with limits of agreement, coefficient of variation (CV) from the two modalities were performed in order to test the reproducibility. Furthermore, CVs from SUVmax and SUVpeak were compared. The area under the curve from cumulative SUV–volume histograms were measured and tested for reproducibility of the distribution of 18F-FDG uptake.Results:
24 patients had two pre-treatment PET/CT scans and 21 patients had two pre-treatment PET/MR scans available for further analyses. Mean difference for SUVmax, peak and mean was approximately 4% for PET/CT and 3% for PET/MR, with 95% limits of agreement less than ±20%. CV was small (5–7%) for both modalities. There was no significant difference in CVs between PET/CT and PET/MR (p = 0.31). SUVmax was not more reproducible than SUVpeak (p = 0.09).Conclusion:
18F-FDG uptake in PET/CT and PET/MR is highly reproducible and we found no difference in reproducibility between PET/CT and PET/MR.Advances in knowledge:
This is the first report to test reproducibility of PET/CT and PET/MR.Functional imaging with fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) has been shown to be useful for prognostication of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC),1–3 and the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT has also been shown to reduce interobserver variability in target delineation for radiotherapy.4,5 Furthermore, 18F-FDG PET/CT can identify regions of the tumour with a high risk of relapse, leading to the idea that 18F-FDG uptake might be a target for dose painting.6,7 Finally, 18F-FDG PET/CT may be used in response evaluation.8,9 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) has for many years been the main uptake measurement in prognostic studies for various malignancies. More recent studies have focused on demonstrating prognostic value of PET/CT-based volumetric parameters such as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV is the sum of the volume of voxels with standard uptake value (SUV) exceeding a certain threshold value in a tumour, and TLG is calculated by multiplying MTV and the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of the MTV. These volume-based PET parameters have increasingly gained interest and have been reported to be significant prognostic factors for various malignancies including HNSCC.10–13 18F-FDG PET/CT is currently not routinely recommended as a diagnostic tool in HNSCC except in very specific situations,14 but reproducibility of the 18F-FDG signal is a prerequisite for a more widespread use of 18F-FDG PET for the above-mentioned indications. Yet, only a few studies of the reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET/CT exist8,15–21 and none of these studies includes patients with HNSCC.MRI is gaining acceptance as an imaging modality for oncology as it offers superior soft-tissue contrast compared with CT alone, and it has been suggested that information from PET/CT and MR is complementary in head and neck cancer.22 The introduction of the integrated PET/MR scanner offers a unique opportunity to combine the high soft-tissue contrast of MR with the functional imaging from PET within a single imaging session. PET/MR is still in its infancy, but the combined modality imaging is potentially useful in the management of patients with HNSCC.22–28 However, the same criteria of reproducibility as with PET/CT should be upheld by this new modality. The purpose of this prospective test–retest study is to assess the reproducibility of both 18F-FDG PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MR in a homogenous cohort of patients with HNSCC. 相似文献The objective of this study was to describe and compare the timing of cervical spine clearance in trauma patients with an unreliable physical examination.
MethodsWe prospectively included adult trauma patients admitted with a cervical collar and an unreliable clinical examination (as defined by the NEXUS criteria) at two level 1 trauma centers: one in the USA (US) and one in Denmark (DK). We excluded patients with cervical spine injuries requiring a collar or surgery as treatment and patients with a collar placed after hospital arrival. The primary outcome was time from emergency department (ED) arrival to collar removal. Secondary outcomes included time to CT of the cervical spine (CTCS). At the US trauma center, an institutional protocol allowing cervical spine clearance exclusively by CTCS was in place. At the Danish trauma center, cervical spine clearance was based on a clinical evaluation by an orthopedic surgeon, usually after CTCS.
ResultsA total of 113 patients were included (US: n = 56; DK: n = 57). The median age was 47 years, and 68% were males. The main reasons for an unreliable physical examination were a Glasgow Coma Scale score below 14 (35%), distracting injuries (26%), cervical spine tenderness (13%) and intoxication (13%). The injury severity score at the US trauma center was higher than at the DK trauma center (median: 17 vs. 11, p = 0.03). Both time to CTCS (median: 41 vs. 18 min, p < 0.0001) and time to collar removal (median: 1042 vs. 49 min, p < 0.0001) were significantly greater at the US trauma center.
ConclusionsTime to collar removal was significantly greater in a trauma center utilizing a cervical spine clearance protocol based on CTCS. As patients may develop complications related to the collar, future studies should clarify how early removal can be implemented without increasing the risk of morbidity.
相似文献