Improving graft survival for patients undergoing liver transplantation

Dickson RC, Pungpapong S, Keaveny AP, Taner BC, Ghabril M, Aranda‐Michel J, Satyanarayana R, Bonatti H, Kramer DJ, Nguyen JH. Improving graft survival for patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E345–E355. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Liver transplant (LT) outcomes are reported to be improving in non‐HCV recipients but not for those infected with HCV. Our aim was to evaluate graft survival and predictors of outcome in HCV and non‐HCV patients before and after 2003. Patients with primary LT between February 1, 1998, and December 31, 2005, were included. Patients were divided into Era 1 (1998–2002) and Era 2 (2003–2005) with follow‐up through May 31, 2009. Graft survival was compared for HCV, non‐HCV, and all patients. There was significant improvement in graft survival in Era 2 for HCV patients. Graft survival in Era 2 of HCV patients was equivalent to non‐HCV patients. The most significant improvement between eras was in outcomes of grafts from donors ≥60 yr with three‐yr graft survival 58.6 (51.3–65.9) vs. 75.4 (68.9–81.9), p = 0.002. The use of donors ≥60 did not change between eras: 31% vs. 34%; however, utilization in HCV recipients decreased from 36% to 3% (p < 0.001). In conclusion, graft survival of HCV patients has improved significantly since 2003 and was comparable to non‐HCV patients up to three yr. The change in management of donor organs into HCV and non‐HCV patients likely contributed to this outcome.     

Autograft containment in posterolateral spine fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pseudoarthrosis rates in lumbar intertransverse fusion remain high. Compression and displacement of the developing fusion mass by the paraspinal musculature may be a contributory factor. Biocontainment devices have been clinically used in the skull and mandible to guide bone regeneration. The role of a mechanical device in containing graft material in the developing posterolateral lumbar spine fusion is unclear. PURPOSE: To determine the benefits of using a bioabsorbable graft-containment device for lumbar intertransverse fusion, and to evaluate the biocompatibility of this implant by histological analysis of the host tissue reaction. STUDY DESIGN: A rabbit intertransverse spine fusion model was used to evaluate a bioabsorbable graft-containment implant. Study and control groups were compared with regard to the rate, volume, and quality of fusion, as well as host tissue reaction to the graft and implant. METHODS: Fourteen adult male New Zealand White rabbits underwent bilateral posterolateral intertransverse spine arthrodesis at L3-L4. The control group (n=7) received autograft alone, and the study group received autografts placed in open meshed hemicylinders fashioned from LactoSorb sheets (LactoSorb; Biomet Orthopedics Inc., Warsaw, IN). Spines were harvested at 6 weeks and imaged. Radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images were used to calculate the rate, area, and volume of fusion mass. Sections were fixed and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Mallory trichrome for histological analysis of fusion and host tissue response. The Mann-Whitney nonparametric statistical test was used for the radiographic and CT qualitative assessments. The CT volume quantitation was analyzed using the Student t test. A p value of <.05 was used to assign statistical significance. RESULTS: The fusion rates on radiographs and CT imaging did not show a significant difference (p>.05) between the biocontainment and control groups. The volume of fusion revealed a significant increase with biocontainment (mean+/-standard error; total left+right fusion sides=2.88+/-0.30 cc) compared with controls (2.12+/-0.15 cc) (p<.05). Histology revealed no difference in the maturity or the quality of the fusion mass between the two groups. Inflammatory response around the developing fusion mass and muscle necrosis were slightly increased in the study group. The LactoSorb biocontainment material led to variable inflammatory reaction, with some areas showing little or no response and other showing an inflammatory response with fibrous connective tissue, lymphocyte infiltration, and focal foreign body giant cell reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of fusion was similar with or without a containment device for onlay bone graft. A significant increase in the volume of the fusion suggests that a biocontainment device does play a role in protecting the developing fusion mass from the mechanical effects of the paraspinal musculature. The clinical use of this device cannot be justified at this time, and further studies will determine whether this increase in fusion volume will translate into a better incidence and volume of fusion in primate and human models.     

When is a bone scan study appropriate in asymptomatic men diagnosed with prostate cancer？

Aims： To determine when a bone scan investigation is appropriate in asymptomatic men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Methods： Between November 2005 and July 2006, 317 men with prostate cancer underwent a bone scan study; 176 men fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prostate-specific antigen （PSA） cut-offs as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses using digital rectal examination finding, biopsy Gleason scores and age were performed to determine when a bone scan study is likely to be of value. Results： Only 1/61 men （1.6%） with a serum PSA 〈 20 ng/mL had a positive bone scan. However, 2/38 men （4.7%） with a serum PSA 20.1-40.0 ng/mL, 3/20 men （15%） with a serum PSA 40.1-60.0 ng/mL, 7/19 men （36.8%） with a serum PSA 60.1-100.0 ng/mL and 19/38 men （50%） with a serum PSA 〉 100.0 ng/mL had positive bone scans. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were uninformative in these groups. Conclusion： Based on our findings, a bone scan is of limited value in asymptomatic prostate cancer patients presenting PSA 〈 20 ng/mL. Therefore, this investigation can be eliminated unless a curative treatment is contemplated. Furthermore, digital rectal examination finding, biopsy Gleason score and age are unhelpful in predicting those who might harbor bone metastasis.     

Colour Doppler sonography of flaccid penis in evaluation of erectile dysfunction

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction is a common and potentially treatable problem. Other than psychological, anatomical and metabolic factors, vasculogenic causes also play an important role in erectile dysfunction. Among the various diagnostic tools available for the diagnosis of vasculogenic causes, colour Doppler sonography is noninvasive, simple and promising. METHODS: This preliminary prospective study was conducted on 40 patients with erectile dysfunction, coming from a rural background to a hospital situated in a semi-urban setting. RESULTS: It was found that a cut-off value of 10 cm/second for peak systolic velocity in flaccid penis had the best accuracy among three chosen cut-off values, i.e. 5, 10, 15 cm/second, for detecting arterial insufficiency with sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity of 93.6%, negative predictive value of 98% and positive predictive value of 80%. CONCLUSION: Doppler sonography may be used as a good predictor of clinical response to intracavernosal injection of a vasodilating pharmacological agent.     

Incisional hernia in a 12-mm non-bladed trocar site following laparoscopic nephrectomy

Non-bladed trocars, radially-dilating systems, and conical blunt devices are considered less traumatic to the abdominal wall because they do not incise the fascia itself. Consequently, several authors have suggested that closure of the abdominal fascia may be unnecessary if such non-bladed laparoscopic trocars are used. We report of a case in whom a port-site hernia was diagnosed at the site of a 12-mm non-bladed trocar 11 days after laparoscopic nephrectomy.     

Comparison of the responsiveness of the SF-36 and WOMAC in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

This study examines the responsiveness of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Eighty-nine patients completed the WOMAC and SF-36 preoperatively and postoperatively. Standardized response means (SRMs) and effect sizes (ES) were used to measure responsiveness. Mean follow-up was 17 months. The SRMs for the WOMAC ranged from -0.93 to -1.49, and the ES ranged from -1.02 to -1.53. The SRMs for the SF-36 ranged from 0.22 to 1.64, and the ES ranged from 0.20 to 1.97. The highest values occurred with the physical functioning, bodily pain, and Physical Component Summary Scales. This study demonstrates a similar level of responsiveness of the WOMAC and several components of the SF-36. This suggests that the isolated use of the SF-36 may be adequate to monitor outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. There may still be a role for the WOMAC when comparing outcomes of specific designs or techniques of total hip arthroplasty.     

Symptomatic rectocele: what are the indications for repair?

Background

The surgical indications for symptomatic rectocele are undefined, and surgery has high recurrence rates. We implemented magnetic resonance imaging defecography (MRID) to determine if utilizing strict inclusion criteria for rectocele repair improves outcomes.

Methods

Patients with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) who underwent dynamic MRID were evaluated. Indications for surgical repair were defecation requiring manual assistance and the following MRID results: anterior defect >2 cm, incomplete evacuation, and the absence of perineal descent. Primary outcomes were the change in quality of life (QOL) scores and recurrence.

Results

From 2006 to 2013, 143 patients who presented with ODS underwent MRID. Seventeen patients met the criteria for repair. Recurrence was low (5.8%) with a median follow-up of 23 months, QOL scores improved from 57.3 to 76.5 (P = .041).

Conclusions

A minority of patients (12%) with ODS met the above criteria for rectocele repair. Patients who underwent repair had a significant improvement in QOL and low recurrence rate.     

Meta-analysis of self-gripping mesh (Progrip) versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair

BackgroundThis metaanalysis was designed to systematically analyse all published randomized controlled trials comparing self-gripping mesh (ProGrip) and sutured mesh to analyse early and long term outcomes for open inguinal hernia repair.MethodsA literature search was performed using the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase and Science Citation Index Expanded. Randomized trials comparing self-gripping mesh with sutured mesh were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.2 software. The primary outcome measures were hernia recurrence and chronic pain after operation. Secondary outcome measures included surgical time, wound complications and perioperative complications.ResultsFive randomized trials were identified as suitable, including 1170 patients. There was no significant difference between the two types of mesh repairs in perioperative complications, wound haematoma, chronic groin pain and hernia recurrence. Wound infection was lower in self gripping mesh group compared to sutured mesh but this was not statistically significant (risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.30–1.06, P = 0.08). The duration of operation was significantly shorter with self-gripping mesh compared to sutured mesh with a mean difference of ?5.48 min [?9.31, ?1.64] Z = 2.80 (P = 0.005).ConclusionSelf-gripping mesh was associated with shorter operative time compared to sutured mesh. Both types of mesh repairs have comparable perioperative and long term outcomes.