Contribution of phlebography in the surgical treatment of chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremities

In which circumstances does a surgeon request phlebograms and which ones? What is the contribution of phlebography regarding therapeutic indications and surgical technique.     

Conclusions

Sans résumé

---

Conclusions Conclusions

     

Pelvic floor muscle training with biofeedback and bladder training in elderly women: a feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE: It is generally assumed that interventions used to treat urinary incontinence (UI) in young women could simply be applied to older competent and motivated women, but these assumptions have not been formally tested. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using physical therapies to treat UI in older women. DESIGN: Twelve-week time series. SETTINGS AND SUBJECTS: We recruited women older than 75 years with UI from an outpatient urology clinic and a waiting list for incontinence surgery. METHODS: After a baseline evaluation, the women collected data on their incontinence symptoms and bladder habits for 3 weeks using the 72-hour voiding diary and the 24-hour pad test. They then received 6 physical therapy treatments consisting of a combination of bladder training and pelvic floor muscle training assisted with biofeedback for 6 weeks. This was followed by another 3-week period of data collection and a final evaluation. RESULTS: Ten women participated in the study; 7 completed it. They were all comfortable with the treatment. They complied with the study demands in terms of attendance at treatment session (100%), data collection (96%), and completion of exercises at home (82%). The authors observed a decrease in the number of incontinent and urgency episodes. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study demonstrates that some women older than 75 years are good candidates to undertake physical therapies for UI and follow study demands. Random controlled studies that include this population will provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of these therapies.     

Extra-intracranial shunts by venous grafts interposed on the carotid system

Patients with occlusive arterial diseases, tumors invading the vascular structures of the skull base or giant aneurysms may benefit from an EICB. Most of the time this can be achieved using a scalp artery. But in cases of a thrombotic ECA, excessively short or thin scalp branches or destruction of those by prior cranial surgery, an interposed venous graft is needed. In the author's series, which consists of 16 patients, the bypass was performed for ICA occlusive diseases in 5, before complete removal of cavernous sinus tumours in 4 and prior to cervical internal carotid ligation for giant aneurysms in 7. The grafts were always harvested from the internal saphenous vein. The proximal site of implantation was CCA (2 cases), ECA (6 cases), ICA (1 case), superior thyroid A (2 cases)--i.e. 11 long grafts--and the trunk of the occipital A--i.e. short grafts in 5 cases. In this series, there was no mortality and no morbidity related to revascularization. The early patency rate, checked with arteriography, was 62.5% (10 cases) and the late one 56.2% (9 cases). Causes of failure, partially related to technical difficulties in 2 cases, were almost always due to an insufficient extra-intracranial pressure gradient (4 cases). Excepted in one case, there was no correlation between patency and the use or not of anti-aggregant and/or heparin. Literature data are summarized and discussed. They all confirm the importance--besides the absence of technical errors--of a sufficient extra-intracranial gradient for obtaining a good patency rate.     

Peripheral Foot Blockade Versus Popliteal Fossa Nerve Block: A Prospective Randomized Trial in 51 Patients

The majority of foot and ankle operations are performed on an outpatient basis and often under some form of regional anesthesia. In this prospective, randomized study of 51 patients undergoing elective unilateral forefoot procedures, we compared 2 different anesthetic techniques: the peripheral foot blockade and the popliteal sciatic nerve block. Variables assessed included the quality of surgical anesthesia, postoperative analgesia, and the incidence of postoperative complications. The anesthesia was classified as effective if it was the sole anesthetic technique for the forefoot surgery. We found successful results in both groups: 92% in the foot block group and 96% in the popliteal block group. Analysis of time required to perform the anesthetic procedure showed a significant difference between the 2 groups, with foot block being considerably faster (14.3 minutes vs 19.2 minutes for popliteal block) (P = .0078). Foot block patients demonstrated 10.96 hours of analgesia, whereas popliteal block patients exhibited 14.32 hours (P = .132). With a mean follow-up of 5.7 months, we did not find anesthesia-related complications in any of the patients. Both techniques showed a high level of safety and efficacy, with no significant difference detected between them. Our patients showed a high rate of satisfaction with both procedures (96% for foot block patients and 96.1% for popliteal block patients) and reported a good discharge disposition. These data show that both procedures are safe and effective anesthetic techniques and well suited to forefoot ambulatory surgery.     

BoneMorphing versus freehand localization of anatomical landmarks: consequences for the reproducibility of implant positioning in total knee arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the influence of the acquisition method in image-free computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA), and the reproducibility of implant planning using BoneMorphing, a 3D morphometric model obtained by a 3D-to-3D elastic registration of statistical models to sparse point clouds acquired directly on the bone surface with a pointer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five surgeons (one expert, four trainees) each performed a CAS-TKA hybrid protocol based on morphometric models and landmarks on a cadaveric knee 10 times. In addition, several additional landmarks were digitized during each acquisition. The reproducibility of the implant positioning and sizing, as determined by an implant planning algorithm with morphometric models, was compared to direct digitization accuracy. RESULTS: Femoral and tibial implant positioning parameters with the hybrid protocol resulted in intra-surgeon standard deviations (SDs) of less than+/-1.4 degrees for rotation and 1.9 mm for translation for all surgeons in all directions except for tibial axial rotation (the only parameter determined by a digitized landmark and not recomputed in the 3D model). The variability in individual landmark digitization varied from 2 to 5 mm SD for certain landmarks, with ranges of 15-25 mm across all surgeons. The comparison study showed an improvement in femoral rotation reproducibility with the morphometric model when using the posterior condylar axis. Tibial implant reproducibility for each method was comparable, with the morphometric model giving better results in well-digitized areas such as the tibial plateau. CONCLUSION: A CAS-TKA protocol based on a deformed statistical model offers reproducible implant positioning. Some landmarks, such as distal condyles, show sufficient reproducibility in the direction of interest, while others, such as the anterior tibial tubercle, can lead to hazardous implant positioning. This should be taken into consideration when designing a CAS-TKA system with bony landmarks. In areas where a sufficient number of points have been digitized with good coverage, such as on the distal and posterior femoral condyles or the tibial plateau areas, the information derived from the 3D model is more accurate and reproducible than that derived from digitization. Good training and a guiding user interface are essential to guarantee coverage quality.