Breaking sitting with light activities vs structured exercise: a randomised crossover study demonstrating benefits for glycaemic control and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes

Aims/hypothesis

We aimed to examine the effects of breaking sitting with standing and light-intensity walking vs an energy-matched bout of structured exercise on 24 h glucose levels and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

In a randomised crossover study, 19 patients with type 2 diabetes (13 men/6 women, 63?±?9 years old) who were not using insulin each followed three regimens under free-living conditions, each lasting 4 days: (1) Sitting: 4415 steps/day with 14 h sitting/day; (2) Exercise: 4823 steps/day with 1.1 h/day of sitting replaced by moderate- to vigorous-intensity cycling (at an intensity of 5.9 metabolic equivalents [METs]); and (3) Sit Less: 17,502 steps/day with 4.7 h/day of sitting replaced by standing and light-intensity walking (an additional 2.5 h and 2.2 h, respectively, compared with the hours spent doing these activities in the Sitting regimen). Blocked randomisation was performed using a block size of six regimen orders using sealed, non-translucent envelopes. Individuals who assessed the outcomes were blinded to group assignment. Meals were standardised during each intervention. Physical activity and glucose levels were assessed for 24 h/day by accelerometry (activPAL) and a glucose monitor (iPro2), respectively. The incremental AUC (iAUC) for 24 h glucose (primary outcome) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR) were assessed on days 4 and 5, respectively.

Results

The iAUC for 24 h glucose (mean?±?SEM) was significantly lower during the Sit Less intervention than in Sitting (1263?±?189 min?×?mmol/l vs 1974?±?324 min?×?mmol/l; p?=?0.002), and was similar between Sit Less and Exercise (Exercise: 1383?±?194 min?×?mmol/l; p?=?0.499). Exercise failed to improve HOMA2-IR compared with Sitting (2.06?±?0.28 vs 2.16?±?0.26; p?=?0.177). In contrast, Sit Less (1.89?±?0.26) significantly reduced HOMA2-IR compared with Exercise (p?=?0.015) as well as Sitting (p?=?0.001).

Conclusions/interpretation

Breaking sitting with standing and light-intensity walking effectively improved 24 h glucose levels and improved insulin sensitivity in individuals with type 2 diabetes to a greater extent than structured exercise. Thus, our results suggest that breaking sitting with standing and light-intensity walking may be an alternative to structured exercise to promote glycaemic control in patients type 2 diabetes.

Trial registration:

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02371239

Funding:

The study was supported by a Kootstra grant from Maastricht University Medical Centre⁺, and the Dutch Heart Foundation. Financial support was also provided by Novo Nordisk BV, and Medtronic and Roche made the equipment available for continuous glucose monitoring

     

Human Bocavirus and KI/WU Polyomaviruses in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients

We evaluated the prevalence of human bocavirus and KI and WU polyomaviruses in pediatric intensive care patients with and without lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). The prevalence of these viruses was 5.1%, 0%, and 2.6%, respectively, in children with LRTI and 4.8%, 4.8%, and 2.4%, respectively, in those without LRTI.