Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on functional and histopathologic outcome after traumatic brain injury in mice

OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has been used to reduce the risk of sepsis in patients with traumatic brain injury. However, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor exerts potent pro- and anti-inflammatory effects that could influence secondary injury, and outcome, after traumatic brain injury. Our objective was to determine the effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on histopathologic, motor, and cognitive outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury in mice. DESIGN: Experimental study. SETTING: Research laboratory at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. SUBJECTS: Forty-eight adult male C57Bl/6 mice. INTERVENTIONS: Mice (8 wks of age, n = 16/group) were administered granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or saline subcutaneously twice per day for 7 days after controlled cortical impact or sham injury (n = 16). Absolute neutrophil counts, motor function, Morris water maze performance, and lesion volume were determined after controlled cortical impact or sham injury. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At the time of controlled cortical impact, body weight, brain and body temperature, and systemic absolute neutrophil counts did not differ between groups. Compared with control, systemic absolute neutrophil count was increased more than ten-fold in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-treated mice on posttrauma days 2 and 7 (p < .05, repeated-measures analysis of variance) but did not differ between groups by day 14. There were no differences between groups in tests of motor function or histopathologic outcome. However, compared with control, mice given granulocyte colony-stimulating factor had improved Morris water maze performance after controlled cortical impact (p < .05, repeated-measures analysis of variance) but not sham injury. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest a small beneficial effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on functional outcome after traumatic brain injury in adult mice but do not show differences in histopathology or motor outcome between treated and control groups.     

Neurological manifestations in patients with COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

IntroductionThe intensification of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) complications, severe symptoms, and high mortality rate has led researchers to focus on this significant issue. While respiratory and cardiac complications have been described as high‐risk manifestations in patients with COVID‐19, neurological complications can also enhance mortality. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of neurological complications arises from SARS‐CoV‐2 and assess the mortality rate from neurological complications.Material and MethodsLiterature review was conducted by searching in PubMed/Medline, Web of Sciences, and Embase. After performing search strategies with relevant terms, a number of articles were excluded, including review articles, systematic review or meta‐analysis, duplicate publication of same researchers, congress abstracts, animal studies, case reports, case series, and articles reporting a history of neurological features prior to COVID‐19 infection. After retrieving the data, statistical analysis was performed using the STATA Version 14 software.ResultsFrom 4455 retrieved publications, 20 articles were selected for further analysis. Among 18,258 included patients, 2791 showed neurological symptoms, which were classified into different groups. Headache, confusion, and fatigue were reported as the most non‐specific neurological features in confirmed COVID‐19 patients. Psychiatric symptoms, CNS disorders, cerebrovascular disorders, CNS inflammatory disorders, PNS disorders, neuromuscular disorders, etc., were defined as specific neurological manifestations. The pooled prevalence of neurological manifestations and mortality rate of COVID‐19 patients with neurological features were estimated to be 23.0% (95% CI: 17.8–29.2) and 29.1% (95% CI: 20.3–39.8), respectively.ConclusionNeurological manifestations may commonly happen in patients with COVID‐19. This study reported a high prevalence of neurological complications and mortality rates in COVID‐19 patients. Therefore, patients with COVID‐19 who indicated neurological symptoms should be taken seriously and should receive early treatment to prevent undesirable events.     

Obesity and gut–microbiota–brain axis: A narrative review

IntroductionObesity is a major health problem that is associated with many physiological and mental disorders, such as diabetes, stroke, and depression. Gut microbiota has been affirmed to interact with various organs, including the brain. Intestinal microbiota and their metabolites might target the brain directly via vagal stimulation or indirectly through immune‐neuroendocrine mechanisms, and they can regulate metabolism, adiposity, homoeostasis and energy balance, and central appetite and food reward signaling, which together have crucial roles in obesity. Studies support the concept of bidirectional signaling within the gut–brain axis (GBA) in the pathophysiology of obesity, mediated by metabolic, endocrine, neural, and immune system mechanisms.Materials and methodsScopus, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases were searched to find relevant studies.ResultsThe gut–brain axis (GBA), a bidirectional connection between the gut microbiota and brain, influences physiological function and behavior through three different pathways. Neural pathway mainly consists of the enteric nervous system (ENS) and vagus nerve. Endocrine pathway, however, affects the neuroendocrine system of the brain, particularly the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and immunological pathway. Several alterations in the gut microbiome can lead to obesity, by modulating metabolic pathways and eating behaviors of the host through GBA. Therefore, novel therapies targeting the gut microbiome, i.e., fecal microbiota transplantation and supplementation with probiotics and prebiotics, can be a potential treatment for obesity.ConclusionThis study corroborates the effect of gut microbiome on physiological function and body weight. The results show that the gut microbiota is becoming a target for new antiobesity therapies.     

Bell's palsy after Sputnik V COVID‐19 (Gam‐COVID‐Vac) vaccination

A possible association between Bell''s palsy and COVID‐19 vaccination has been suggested previously. Here, we report two cases of facial nerve hemiparalysis following the Sputnik V COVID‐19 vaccination in a 27‐year‐old female patient and a 58‐year‐old male patient who were both clinically diagnosed with Bell''s palsy.     

Validity of self-reported hypertension and related factors in the adult population: Preliminary results from the cohort in the west of Iran

This study aimed to investigate the validity of self-reported hypertension and related factors in the Dehgolan Prospective Cohort Study (DehPCS). Data were obtained from 3996 participants aged 35–70 years in the enrolment phase of DehPCS. Self-reported hypertension and sociodemographic factors were collected by well-trained interviewers before hypertension diagnosis based on the reference criteria. The history of anti-hypertensive medication use and/or systolic blood pressure ≥140 (mmHg), or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 (mmHg) were considered as hypertension. Disagreement between self-reported and reference measures was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and kappa values. Binary and multinomial logistic regressions were used to investigate the correlates of validity of self-reported hypertension. The hypertension prevalence based on self-reports and the reference criteria was 19.49% and 21.60%, respectively. An acceptable percentage of kappa agreement value of 68.7% and relatively good overall agreement of 89.8% were found. Self-reported hypertension was guaranteed moderate sensitivity of 72.0% and high specificity of 94.5%, as well as the NPV and PPV of 92/7% and 77/9%, respectively. The chances of false-positive and false-negative reporting increased with older age, higher BMI, and a family history of hypertension. Being female, older age, higher BMI, concurrent diabetes, and stronger family ties to hypertension patients significantly increased the chance of reporting true positives relative to true negatives. Although, self-reported hypertension has an acceptable validity and can be used as a valid tool for screening epidemiological studies, it needs to be investigated because its validity is affected by age, gender, family history of hypertension, and other socio-demographic characteristics.