Can There be a Place for Intraoperative Salvaged Blood in Spine Tumor Surgery?

Background

Intraoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has been used in musculoskeletal surgery extensively. However, it has never found its place in musculoskeletal oncologic surgery. We have conducted the first-ever study to evaluate the feasibility of IOCS in combination with a leucocyte-depletion filter (LDF) in metastatic spine tumor surgery. This was to pave the path for use of IOCS-LDF in musculoskeletal oncologic surgery.

Methods

Patients with a known primary epithelial tumor, who were offered surgery for metastatic spinal disease, were recruited. Blood samples were collected at three different stages during the surgery: from the operative field before IOCS processing, after IOCS processing, and after IOCS-LDF processing. Three separate samples (5 mL each) were taken at each stage. Samples were examined using immunohistochemical monoclonal antibodies to identify tumor cells of epithelial origin.

Results

Of 30 patients in the study, 6 were excluded for not fulfilling the inclusion criteria, leaving 24 patients. Malignant tumor cells were detected in the samples from the operative field before IOCS processing in eight patients and in the samples from the transfusion bag after IOCS processing in three patients. No viable malignant cell was detectable in any of the blood samples after passage through both IOCS and LDF.

Conclusions

The findings support the notion that the IOCS-LDF combination works effectively in eliminating tumor cells from salvaged blood, so this technique can be applied successfully in spine tumor surgery. This concept can then further be extended to whole musculoskeletal tumor surgery and other oncologic surgeries with further appropriate clinical studies.     

Relationship between diabetic retinopathy microalbuminuria and other modifiable risk factors

BackgroundDiabetic Retinopathy (DR) is an important microvascular complication of diabetes that can lead to irreversible blindness. Microalbuminuria is strongly associated with diabetic retinopathy and can be used as a reliable marker of diabetic retinopathy.AimTo assess the association between DR, microalbuminuria, and other modifiable risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methodology3090 patients with T2DM visiting North Delhi Diabetes Centre, New Delhi between July 2016 to October 2019 were evaluated for the clinical and biochemical parameters that included urinary albumin, HbA1C, lipid profiles, serum creatinine estimation and underwent biothesiometry.Results3090 patients (1350 females and 1740 males), with mean age of 52.7 ± 9.2 years and diabetes duration ranging from 1 to 19 years (mean 9.4 ± 6), duration of less than 5 years, 6–10 years and more than 10 years in 52%, 26% and in 22%, respectively. Duration of diabetes was strong predictor of retinopathy (p = 0.001). The HbA1c and BMI in patients with DR was significantly higher than in those without DR. 18.2% patients were diagnosed to have retinopathy. Peripheral neuropathy was observed in 24.2% and was positively associated with DR (p = 0.002). 33.9% and 4.5% patients had microalbuminuria macroalbuminuria, respectively and 9.7% patients had creatinine >1.3 mg/dL. There was significant positive relationship between different grades of retinopathy and albuminuria.ConclusionsOur study is a large real-world study that demonstrates that HbA1c, BMI, duration of diabetes, microalbuminuria and peripheral neuropathy are relatively, yet cohesively contributing factors towards varying grade of retinopathy.     

Beating heart versus conventional reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: The incidence of reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing with an increase in the number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. The clinical outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass are different. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared clinical parameters in patients who underwent off-pump (n=156) versus on-pump (n=194) redo coronary artery bypass grafting performed between January 1995 and December 2001 in our institute, to determine if off-pump surgery has improved the surgical outcome of redo coronary artery bypass grafting and emerged as an ideal technique. Patients who underwent on-pump redo surgery required more postoperative blood transfusion (86.53% on-pump v. 12.82% off-pump. p=0.001), prolonged ventilatory support (>24 hours) (16.49% on-pump v. 7.7% off-pump, p=0.021) and higher inotropic support (23.71% on-pump v. 10.89% off-pump, p=0.003). On-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting was also associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (40+/-6.2 hours on-pump v. 20+/-4.1 hours off-pump, p=0.001) and longer hospital stay (9+/-4.2 days on-pump v. 5+/-3.4 days off-pump, p=0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in on-pump patients than in off-pump ones (7.7% v. 3.2%); however, this was not statistically significant (p=0.114). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting is a safe method of myocardial revascularization with lower operative morbidity and mortality, less requirement of blood products and early hospital discharge, compared with conventional on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting.