The Experience of Pregnancy and Birth with Midwives: Results from the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey

Abstract: Background: In Canada maternity care is publicly funded, and although women may choose their care providers, choices may be limited. The purpose of this study was to compare perceptions of maternity outcomes and experiences of those who received care from midwives with those who received care from other providers. Methods: Based on the 2006 Canadian census, a random sample of women (n = 6,421) who had recently given birth in Canada completed a computer‐assisted telephone interview for the Maternity Experiences Survey. The sample was stratified according to province or territory where birth occurred, age, rural or urban residence, and presence of other children in the home. Those who were 15 years of age and older, gave birth to a singleton baby, and were living with their infant were eligible for inclusion. Results: Women whose primary prenatal providers were midwives had fewer ultrasounds and were more likely to attend prenatal classes and have at least five or more prenatal visits. They were also more likely to rate satisfaction with their maternity experience as “very positive” and be satisfied with information provided on a variety of pregnancy and birth topics if their primary prenatal provider was a midwife. They were almost half as likely to experience induction and 7.33 times more likely to experience a medication‐free delivery. They were more likely to initiate and maintain breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months. Conclusions: Evidence shows that midwifery outcomes and levels of satisfaction meet or exceed Canadian maternity care standards. Facilitation of the continuing integration of midwives as autonomous practitioners throughout Canada is recommended. (BIRTH 38:3 September 2011)     

Roundtable Discussion: “No One Can Condemn You to a C‐Section!”

Abstract: The stories in this Roundtable Discussion are related by two women whose babies were born recently in Canadian hospitals. Each woman had undergone a cesarean delivery for her first child, and whereas Sophia delivered her second baby by vaginal birth after a cesarean (VBAC), Marie was unable to find a practitioner or hospital that would allow her to have a VBAC for her second birth. The women describe how they feel about their choices and experiences. Their two accounts and the issues that they raise are discussed in commentaries by a family physician, midwife, doula, and obstetrician. (BIRTH 37:3 September 2010)     

A case study of the effectiveness of nurse-led screening programmes for cervical cancer among Hong Kong Chinese women

Cervical cancer remains a cause of morbidity and mortality among women despite the efficacy of Pap smear screening. Uptake rates for Papanicolaou (Pap) smears among Hong Kong Chinese women remain low and evidence suggests that both intrinsic and extrinsic factors influence women's attendance for Pap smear screening, particularly the practitioner taking the smear. This study examined the experiences and perceptions of Hong Kong Chinese women of having a Pap smear taken by a female doctor or a female nurse using a case study design. A convenience sample of 50 women was selected from the two case study settings. Data collection involved a confidential structured interview, followed by focus group interviews with a sample of women participating in the structured interview. The findings relating to the technical quality and outcome of care provide the focus for this paper. Although women were highly satisfied with the care provided by both practitioners, women were more satisfied with the information given about the procedure by the nurse (P = 0.0130) and had more confidence in the nurse (P = 0.024). One of the five criteria used to assess the quality of smears demonstrated the doctor achieved a statistically significant higher number of smears containing the required percentage of endocervical cells (P = 0. 0180). Nevertheless, none of the smears taken by the nurse required repeating due to an inadequate specimen. These findings suggest, despite the need for audit of Pap smears, that appropriately qualified nurses can make an important contribution to the uptake of Pap smears among this population.     

Whose evidence counts? An exploration of health professionals'' perceptions of evidence-based practice, focusing on the maternity services

OBJECTIVES: to gain an insight into how health professionals in the maternity services define evidence and how they perceive different types of evidence are valued in maternity care. DESIGN: using a qualitative approach data were collected by semi-structured interviews: the content of each was analysed thematically. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: a purposeful sample of ten midwives, two obstetricians and one research nurse. FINDINGS: definitions of evidence vary widely among health practitioners. These definitions are affected by individuals' own beliefs and give rise to a hierarchy in which some types of evidence are valued above others. All the participants made direct or indirect reference to cultural beliefs inherent within the health service, and indicated that these beliefs determine the extent to which different types of evidence are seen as legitimate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the concept of evidence-based practice is not value-free. Evidence that reinforces notions of authoritative knowledge may be transposed into clinical practice quickly and easily. Conversely, health practitioners may have difficulty putting evidence into practice that challenges the cultural norms of the profession. There is a need for further work to make explicit the values that underpin different sources of knowledge and expose the hierarchies of evidence that exist.     

Evaluation of a problem-based curriculum in midwifery

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the implementation of a 'problem-based' learning (PBL) curriculum within midwifery. DESIGN: a 'realistic evaluation' model based on cost-effectiveness models of economics, and incorporating both qualitative and quantitative methodology. The design used historical comparison, comparing students following the new curriculum with a baseline of previous student cohorts and exploring staff and student experiences. SETTING: a 'new' university, providing a degree-level 18 month pre-registration midwifery programme for an intake of about 40 students per cohort. PARTICIPANTS: all students in the cohort qualifying immediately before the implementation and all those in the first cohort following the new curriculum were invited to participate fully. Assessment outcomes for three cohorts of students qualifying before and the first three cohorts qualifying following the change were analysed. All clinical staff directly involved in mentoring the relevant student groups, all academic staff involved in delivering the new curriculum and the course external examiner were invited to participate. Intervention: the evaluation studied a major change in the way the overall midwifery curriculum was delivered, widely described as PBL. MEASUREMENTS: students' experiences and perspectives were sought through review of routine evaluation documents, nominal group technique exercises and focus group discussions at about six months following qualification. Clinical staff experiences and perspectives were sought through written structured questionnaires. Academic staff views were sought through personal semi-structured interviews. Participant observation of the process, review of course documents and of staff reflective commentaries were also conducted. Data on student completion rates and final grade were analysed. FINDINGS: although students' views of the curriculum were generally positive, they experienced some discomfort and difficulty in adjustment to a new style of learning. Small group learning, independence and skills in using and conveying information and research evidence were valued aspects of the new approach. Quality of clinical placement experience and university-practice links were an important area of positive experience or concern. Clinical staff views of the curriculum showed considerable stability, with major concerns being the balance of theory and practice time and skills which were not influenced by the curriculum change. At both points, ability to critically evaluate and use evidence in practice was regarded highly. Student outcomes showed some evidence of possible divergence of grades in the new curriculum. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the manner and context of implementation of educational change may have important implications for student experiences and outcomes and the experiences of educators. Adequate preparation at all levels for a different, more independent style of learning is important and students are likely to need clear guidance and feedback on their progress in the early stages of the curriculum, to monitor progress and to provide reassurance. Longer-term research is needed to assess the impact of PBL on theory-practice links and on the midwives as practitioners.     

Nandrolone Decanoate Induces Genetic Damage in Multiple Organs of Rats

To evaluate the impact potential of nandrolone decanoate on DNA damage in multiple organs of Wistar rats by means of single-cell gel (comet) assay and micronucleus test. A total of 15 animals were distributed into three groups of five animals each as follows: control group = animal not exposed to nandrolone decanoate; experimental group = animals exposed to nandrolone decanoate for 24 h at 5 mg/kg subcutaneously; and experimental group = animals exposed to nandrolone decanoate for 24 h at 15 mg/kg subcutaneously. Significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) were noted in peripheral blood, liver, and heart cells exposed to nandrolone decanoate at the two doses evaluated. A clear dose–response relationship was observed between groups. Kidney cells showed genetic damage at only the highest dose (15 mg/kg) used. However, micronucleus data did not show remarkable differences among groups. In conclusion, the present study indicates that nandrolone decanoate induces genetic damage in rat blood, liver, heart, and kidney cells as shown by single-cell gel (comet) assay results.     

'Out of Hospital': a scoping study of services for carers of people being discharged from hospital

Successive government policies have highlighted the need to inform and involve carers fully in the hospital discharge process. However, some research suggests that many carers feel insufficiently involved and unsupported in this process. This paper summarises a scoping review to identify what the UK literature tells us about the service provision for carers, and its effectiveness, around the time of hospital discharge of the care recipient, and also describes a mapping exercise of the work currently being done by Princess Royal Trust for Carers Centres in England to support carers around the time of hospital discharge. The restriction to UK literature was dictated by the nature of the project; a modest review carried out for a UK-based voluntary sector organization. Fifty-three documents were reviewed, of which 19 papers (representing 17 studies) were reporting on primary research. As only five of these studies actually involved an intervention, it appears there is very little research from the UK which evaluates specific interventions to support carers around the time of hospital discharge of the care recipient. While the mapping exercise showed that in some areas there are services and/or initiatives in place which have been designed to improve the process of discharge for carers, in many places there is still a gap between what policy and research suggest should happen and what actually happens to carers at this time. Even where services and initiatives to support carers through the discharge process exist, there is only limited evidence from research or evaluation to demonstrate their impact on the carer's experience. Further research, both quantitative and qualitative, is required to address these areas and enable commissioners, providers and carers' organizations to work together towards a service in which patients and carers alike receive the support and help they need at this significant time of transition.