Relation of early changes of QT dispersion to changes in left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after a first acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relation between changes of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and changes of QT dispersion (difference in duration between longest and shortest QT interval) following acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: QT dispersion was determined at admission, hospital discharge, and 1 and 3 months following myocardial infarction in 64 consecutive 1-year survivors. Patients were divided into Group A where QT dispersion was < 52 ms at all recordings or initially > 52 ms but decreased during follow-up, and Group B where QT dispersion remained increased > or = 52 ms at all measurements. Doppler-Echocardiography was carried out on day 1, day 5, and after 1, 3, and 12 months. RESULTS: In 26 patients QT dispersion remained increased > or = 52 ms during the first 3 months after infarction. Among these a significant increase of end-systolic volume was seen whereas low or rapid normalized QT dispersion was associated with a significant decrease of ventricular volumes. After 1 year end-systolic (70 +/- 32 ml vs 49 +/- 16 ml, p = 0.006) and end-diastolic volumes (138 +/- 41 ml vs 105 +/- 22 ml, p = 0.001) were higher in Group B. In a multivariate model Group B was significantly related to an increase of end-diastolic volume (p = 0.01). In Group A diastolic function improved in eight patients and in two it deteriorated, whereas improvement was seen in one patient and deterioration in nine patients from Group B (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Following myocardial infarction low QT dispersion is associated with preserved left ventricular function, whereas persistently increased dispersion is associated with left ventricular dilation and deterioration of diastolic function.     

Classifications of thoracic and lumbar fractures: rationale and supporting data

Classification systems are generalizations that attempt to identify common attributes within a group to predict behavior or outcome without sacrificing too much detail. Because of the inherent variability of fractures, classifying them can be difficult. To properly apply any of the commonly cited classification schemes for thoracic and lumbar fractures, one must not only know the injury categories described in the original studies but also be familiar with the rationale for developing the classification. Many original reports describing common thoracic and lumbar injury classifications lack a rigorous scientific foundation. They were based largely on the insights of experienced surgeons and researchers. Although the ideal classification for thoracic and lumbar fractures does not exist, it would incorporate neurologic as well as structural factors. Standardization of terminology as related to treatment decisions and prognosis is key to an improved understanding of the clinical behavior of these injuries and identification of optimal treatment options.     

A retrospective comparison of endonasal KTP laser dacryocystorhinostomy versus external dacryocystorhinostomy

We retrospectively reviewed all primary external dacryocystorhinostomies (DCRs) and endonasal KTP laser DCRs performed for epiphora as a result of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in our unit between 1993 and 2000. Forty-nine patients underwent an external approach and 76 endonasal laser procedures were performed. The success rate of the external group was 94% with a mean follow-up of 9 months. In contrast, the endonasal group's success rate was 64% with a mean follow-up of 12 months. This difference reached statistical significance (P = 0.0002). However, when including revision procedures, the success rate in the endonasal group increased from 64% to 82%. The success rate in the endonasal group improved from 50% in the first 38 cases to 79% in the last 38 cases (P = 0.0084), thereby demonstrating a learning curve. Our study confirms external DCR as the 'gold standard' for a successful outcome. However, the endonasal technique has significant advantages, including being a quicker procedure with less morbidity, no cutaneous scar, and being more amenable to a bilateral procedure, daycase surgery and local anaesthetic. We are persisting with the endonasal technique because of its advantages but have moved towards more 'cold steel' techniques in an effort to improve results and emulate other series. In conclusion, for nasolacrimal duct obstruction, the endonasal technique is our approach of choice, with revision surgery if necessary, and the external technique is held in reserve.     

Immediate percutaneous medialization for acute vocal fold immobility with aspiration

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of immediate bedside or office percutaneous, trans-thyroidal injections of a bioabsorbable gelatin material (Gelfoam, Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI) to decrease the risk of aspiration resulting from acute vocal fold immobility. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients presenting with acute vocal fold immobility and aspiration or high aspiration risk at an urban, tertiary care university hospital. METHODS: All patients were evaluated by videostroboscopy, functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and objective voice measures. Patients with acute vocal fold immobility and evidence of aspiration on history or FEES were given the option of medialization by Gelfoam injection. Injections were performed percutaneously in the office or at the bedside under laryngoscopic guidance. FEES was repeated after injection to verify improvement in aspiration. RESULTS: Eleven patients underwent Gelfoam injection for treatment of aspiration and vocal fold immobility. All were significantly improved on post-injection FEES study. All patients were returned to an oral diet, avoiding the need for long-term enteral access. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous Gelfoam injections is a rapid, temporary solution to the common problem of aspiration resulting from acute vocal fold immobility.     

Epiploic appendagitis

This case report describes epiploic appendagitis in an elderly lady who presented with acute abdomen. The condition was diagnosed on CT scan and the patient treated conservatively.     

Favourable prognostic factors in a large UK experience of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and periampullary region

AIMS: To present the surgical experience in a regional unit, analysing the post-operative outcome, and determining risk factors for survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma. METHODS: Data were collected on 251 patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma (133), ampullary carcinomas (88) and distal common bile duct (30), between 1987 and 2002. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Clinical, surgical and histopathological records were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify the independent prognostic predictors of survival. RESULTS: Median actuarial survival for carcinoma of the pancreatic head, ampulla and distal bile duct were 13.4, 35.5 and 16 months, respectively; p < 0.0001. On univariate analysis for the whole series, the age < or =60, tumour of the head of the pancreas, lymph node positive, resection margin R1, poorly differentiated tumours, and portal vein invasion significantly decreased survival. On multivariate analysis, poor tumour differentiation, surgical margin, lymph node metastases, and age independently influence survival. Mortality and morbidity were 4.8 and 29.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic and periampullary tumours is the only therapy that may cure patients and can be performed safely in centres with significant experience.