Evaluation of the use of reporter antigens in an auricular lymph node assay to assess the immunosensitizing potential of drugs.

Immune-mediated idiosyncratic drug reactions are a major problem for susceptible patients, physicians, and the pharmaceutical industry. Validated screening tools to assess the immunosensitizing capacity of orally or intravenously administered pharmaceuticals are currently not available. To date, the popliteal lymph node assay (PLNA) seems the most promising tool for this purpose. The PLNA has recently been extended with the use of reporter antigens (RA) that are coinjected together with the drug of interest. The measurement of isotypes of RA-specific antibody-secreting cells (ASC) enables the distinction of sensitizing chemicals and (nonsensitizing) irritants without radio-isotopic end points. However, the use of footpad injections raises ethical concerns. Therefore, we examined the use of RA after intradermal injection into the ear of BALB/c mice and measured RA-specific ASC in the draining auricular lymph node (ALN). We show that RA-specific IgG isotype ASC numbers are very useful and sensitive parameters to identify drug-induced hypersensitivity in both PLN and ALN. However, the type 1-associated parameters (CD8(+) cells, macrophages, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-1 beta) that are induced in the PLN by streptozotocin were less pronounced in the ALN. Thus, the PLNA may provide more immunologically relevant information on the mechanisms of certain chemical-induced hypersensitivity reactions. The RA-ALN assay may provide an alternative for the RA-PLNA; both assays can be used to distinguish sensitizing compounds from nonsensitizing ones.     

Presentation and interpretation of food intake data: Factors affecting comparability across studies

Non-uniform, unclear, or incomplete presentation of food intake data limits interpretation, usefulness, and comparisons across studies. In this contribution, we discuss factors affecting uniform reporting of food intake across studies. The amount of food eaten can be reported as mean portion size, number of servings or total amount of food consumed per day; the absolute intake value for the specific study depends on the denominator used because food intake data can be presented as per capita intake or for consumers only. To identify the foods mostly consumed, foods are reported and ranked according to total number of times consumed, number of consumers, total intake, or nutrient contribution by individual foods or food groups. Presentation of food intake data primarily depends on a study's aim; reported data thus often are not comparable across studies. Food intake data further depend on the dietary assessment methodology used and foods in the database consulted; and are influenced by the inherent limitations of all dietary assessments. Intake data can be presented as either single foods or as clearly defined food groups. Mixed dishes, reported as such or in terms of ingredients and items added during food preparation remain challenging. Comparable presentation of food consumption data is not always possible; presenting sufficient information will assist valid interpretation and optimal use of the presented data. A checklist was developed to strengthen the reporting of food intake data in science communication.