Clinical Experience with Tilavist: An Overview of Efficacy and Safety

A programme of clinical studies was carried out to determine the basic efficacy and safety of 2% nedocromil sodium eye drops (Tilavist) in treating allergic conjunctivitis, in 2,905 patients from 3–76 years of age. Results of all the double-masked placebo comparative studies completed to date - five in vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC), five in perennial (PAC) and 16 in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC) - have been assessed in a statistical overview analysis. Nedocromil sodium, administered four times daily to 153 patients with VKC, was significantly more effective than placebo (155 patients) and in the clinicians' opinion gave good control in 76% of cases, compared with 46% for placebo (p < 0.001). Patients with chronic symptoms of PAC also responded better to nedocromil sodium given four times daily (n = 146) rather than twice daily (n = 86), and significantly more patients (p < 0.001) were effectively controlled by four times daily treatment with nedocromil sodium (72%) than with placebo (47%; n= 156). Twice-daily dosage with nedocromil sodium (n = 677) was adequate for SAC, however, and the treatment was statistically better than placebo (p < 0.01-p < 0.001) whether dosed twice or four times daily. Speed of action was assessed in seven SAC studies in which 79% of all patients (n = 295) using nedocromil sodium had experienced relief of symptoms when questioned, half of them within 15 minutes and 74% during the first hour after dosing. Test treatments were well-accepted by both adults and children, and there were no major adverse events. Minor irritations reported more frequently with nedocromil sodium than placebo were stinging or burning of the eyes on application of the drops and a distinctive taste, noted by 5% of the active treatment group (n = 1,552).     

Assessment of PACS Display Systems

This work describes our experience in reviewing the performance criteria for display systems and how we have implemented a practical approach to the assessment of the workstation environment in a large tertiary care hospital. The acceptance criteria contained in the draft report of Topic Group 18 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) were used as a basis for assessment of primary and secondary displays. A telescopic photometer was used to measure the maximum luminance and the contrast ratio of the image for the displays used in our radiology department and in the operating and emergency rooms using the standard Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) pattern, in ambient light and with light decreased as much as possible. About half of the displays met the AAPM criteria for minimum luminance and contrast ratio in low light. None of the systems met the contrast ratio criteria in ambient light. The challenges in improving the performance and calibrating displays are discussed.     

Giving a voice to patient experiences through the insights of pragmatism

As a philosophical position, pragmatism can be critiqued to distinguish truth only with methods that bring about desired results, predominantly with scientific enquiry. The article hopes to dismiss this oversimplification and propose that within mental health nursing, enquiry enlightened by pragmatism can be anchored to methods helping to tackle genuine human problems. Whilst pragmatists suggest one reality exists, fluctuating experiences and shifting beliefs about the world can inhabit within; hence, pragmatists propose reality has the potential to change. Moreover, pragmatism includes being cognisant of what works to whom reality concerns, making reality context-driven, with a view to understand how actions shape experiences so what is generated has usefulness. Hence, it somewhat follows pragmatism can inform mental health nursing, after all, nursing is a discipline of action, and awareness is needed in how actions produce experiences that patients find helpful. Given the principles of recovery are preferably adopted in mental health care, the paper will explore how pragmatism can help nurses move towards that goal; specifically, with patients voicing their experiences. This is because like pragmatism, recovery subscribes to hope that reality can progress, and through meaningful experiences and beliefs, patients have expertise about personal difficulties alongside how life may flourish, despite mental illness.     

Moral reasoning as a catalyst for cultural competence and culturally responsive care

The importance of developing cultural competence among healthcare professionals is well recognized. However, the widespread reports of insensitivity and deficiencies in care for culturally diverse patients illuminate the need to review how cultural competence development is taught, learnt and applied in practice. Unless we can alter the ‘hearts and minds’ of practising nurses to provide the care that they know they should, culturally insensitive care will continue operating in subtle ways. This paper explores the ideas behind nurses’ actions and omissions when caring for culturally diverse patients and proposes the need to examine cultural competence development through a moral reasoning lens. Examining cultural competence development through a moral reasoning lens can help empower nurses, whilst nurturing commitment and courage to providing quality care that meets the needs of culturally diverse patients. The model of morality provides a framework that explores how moral motivation and behaviour occur and can provide a vehicle for critically examining the knowledge, skills and attitudes required to provide culturally responsive care.     

How the COVID-19 pandemic can distort risk adjustment of health plan payment

The European Journal of Health Economics - The COVID-19 pandemic has led to disruptions in healthcare utilization and spending. While some changes might persist (e.g. substitution of specialist...