Current practice patterns in pancreatic surgery: Results of a multi-institutional analysis of seven large surgical departments in germany with 1454 pancreatic head resections, 1999 to 2004 (german advanced surgical treatment study group)

Despite decreasing mortality rates, morbidity is still high after pancreatic head resection. Comparative data in the United States and Europe show a relationship between hospital volume and mortality. Treatment strategies vary frequently, partially because of the lack of evidence-based data. We performed a multi-institutional analysis in Germany evaluating current numbers, indications, techniques, and complication rates of pancreatic head resection. Questionnaires were completed by seven high-volume surgical departments regarding quantitative and qualitative aspects of pancreatic head resections in the period from 1999 to 2004 (five prospective and two retrospective institutional databases). A total of 1454 pancreatic head resections (944 for malignancy) were reported. Mean annual hospital volume ranged from 14 to 52 (10 to 43 in malignancy). Mortality was between 1.1% and 4.8%, morbidity was between 24% and 46%, and pancreatic leakage was between 9% and 20%. In malignant disease, all centers perform standard lymphadenectomy and regard arterial infiltration as a contraindication for resection. However, the rate of portal vein resection varied from 0% to 28%. No consensus is seen on the type of surgery for malignancy and chronic pancreatitis. After resection for pancreatic cancer less than one fourth of the patients receive adjuvant therapy. The results of our analysis in Germany confirm that pancreatic head resection can be performed with low mortality in specialized units. Variations in indications, operative technique, and perioperative care may demonstrate the lack of evidence-based data and/or personal and institutional experience. The low number of patients receiving adjuvant therapy after resection of pancreatic cancer suggests that more efforts must be made to establish novel adjuvant therapies under randomized study conditions. Presented at the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Chicago, Illinois, May 14–18, 2005 (oral presentation).     

Dose-Ranging Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids in Females

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and duration of effect of four doses of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar rhytids in females. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-ranging trial followed by an open-label extension. SETTING: Private dermatologic clinic. SUBJECTS: Eighty female subjects with moderate to severe wrinkles at maximum frown entered the study. The first 40 subjects completing the double-blind phase entered the open-label extension. INTERVENTION: Random administration of 10, 20, 30, or 40 U botulinum toxin type A in divided doses. Open-label trial: 30 U botulinum toxin type A at the same sites in divided doses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Trained observer and subject assessments of wrinkle severity at maximum frown and repose using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (0 = none to 3 = severe), subject satisfaction, and adverse events. Follow-up monthly for up to 1 year postinjection. RESULTS: Relapse rates and responder rates revealed benefits lasting 3 to 6 months or longer. Objectively, 10 U of botulinum toxin type A was significantly less effective than 20, 30, or 40 U. The relapse rate at 4 months was significantly higher in the 10 U group (83%) versus 40, 30, or 20 U (28%, 30%, and 33%, respectively). Subject satisfaction was high in all groups. Duration of effect and response rates were sustained during the open-label extension. Adverse effects were mild and infrequent. CONCLUSION: Twenty to 40 U botulinum toxin type A doses were significantly more effective at reducing glabellar lines than 10 U. Most subjects experienced benefits for 3 to 4 months; some subjects demonstrated effect for up to 12 months.     

Polarized Light-Emitting Diode Magnification for Optimal Recipient Site Creation during Hair Transplant

Background. For several years, magnification has been used to separate follicular groupings from donor strips to minimize transection of hair follicles. There has been no discussion regarding the use of magnification to create recipient sites to limit transection of existing hair follicles in recipient zones.
Objective. The study was performed to evaluate the role of magnification when creating hundreds or thousands of recipient sites in patients with existing hair.
Methods. A 2× magnified polarized light-emitting diode (LED) for graft and recipient site creation (Syris Scientific, Gray, Maine) was used in 75 consecutive male and female patients. A team of four experienced surgical assistants and the author evaluated the device for graft creation, recipient site creation, and insertion of grafts.
Results. There was no perceived advantage in creating grafts or placing grafts compared with other magnification devices and traditional methods. There was less eye strain and greater ease in creating recipient sites using polarized magnification compared with traditional surgical lights and no magnification.
Conclusion. In an era of medications that slow or stop hair loss, magnification in recipient sites can reduce transection of existing hair follicles in recipient zones, leading to maximum density from a procedure. Further studies are needed to confirm the reduced transection rate of hair follicles and determine the ideal magnification. The use of magnification with LED polarized light in the recipient zone is an important new tool in hair transplant.     

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Actinic Keratosis with Imiquimod 5% Cream

BACKGROUND: The results from four phase III, randomized, vehicle-controlled studies showed that imiquimod 5% cream (imiquimod) was safe and effective in the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK). Patients applied imiquimod or vehicle cream to AK lesions on the face or balding scalp, dosing three times per week or two times per week for 16 weeks. OBJECTIVE: To obtain long-term safety follow-up data and estimate AK recurrence in patients who completely cleared their AK lesions in the treatment area at the 8-week post-treatment visit in the phase III studies. METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients from 30 study centers in the United States were evaluated for clinical evidence of AK, and safety data were collected. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 16 months, 24.7% (19 of 77) of the patients administered imiquimod three times per week and 42.6% (23 of 54) of the patients administered imiquimod two times per week had a recurrence of AK (the appearance of at least one AK lesion) in the original treatment area. The median number of AK lesions present was one lesion for both patients receiving imiquimod three times and those receiving imiquimod two times per week compared with a median of six lesions at baseline in the combined three times per week and two times per week phase III studies. There were no long-term safety issues, and the skin quality seen in the imiquimod-treated patients at the end of the phase III studies was maintained. CONCLUSION: One and a half years following treatment, imiquimod continued to provide a long-term clinical benefit in a majority of patients who experienced complete clearance of their AK lesions.     

Double-Blind Prospective Comparative Trial between Foamed and Liquid Polidocanol and Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate in the Treatment of Varicose and Telangiectatic Leg Veins

BACKGROUND: Twenty subjects were treated with either polidocanol (POL) or sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) to compare the efficacy and adverse sequelae of each agent. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of two widely used sclerosing agents. METHODS: After the exclusion of saphenofemoral junction incompetency, each subject's leg veins were categorized by size (< 1, 1-3, and 3-6 mm in diameter). Each leg was then randomized to be treated with 0.5%, 1%, or 1% foam of POL or 0.25%, 0.5%, or 0.5% foam of STS according to vein size. An independent panel of four physicians, blinded to treatment, performed randomized photographic evaluations obtained pretreatment and 12 weeks post-treatment. Subject satisfaction index and overall clinical improvement assessment were also obtained. RESULTS: An average 83% improvement was noted for all vein sizes in all subjects with both POL and STS after a single treatment. Subjects were satisfied with treatment, regardless of the sclerosing agent used or the vein size treated. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse effects between each group. CONCLUSION: Both POL and STS are safe and effective sclerosing agents in the treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins. Both are very tolerable and demonstrate similar post-treatment sequelae.