The association between patient education level and economic status on outcomes following surgical management of (fracture) non-union

Background

Socioeconomic disparities are an inherent and currently unavoidable aspect of medicine. Knowledge of these disparities is an essential component towards medical decision making, particularly among an increasingly diverse population. While healthcare disparities have been elucidated in a wide variety of orthopaedic conditions and management options, they have not been established among patients who present for treatment of an ununited fracture. The purpose of this study is to answer the following questions: 1) Following surgical management of (fracture) non-unions, are there differences in outcomes between differing ethnic groups? 2) Following surgical management of (fracture) non-unions, are there differences in outcomes between patients with differing education levels? 3) Following surgical management of (fracture) non-unions, are there differences in outcome between patients with differing incomes?

Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient

Hip fracture is a potentially devastating condition for older adults. Hip fracture leads to pain and immobilization with complications ranging from delirium to functional loss and death. Although a mainstay of treatment is orthopedic repair, a multidisciplinary comanagement approach, including medical specialists and rehabilitation, may maximize patient recovery. Using the case of Mr W, an older man who sustained a fall and hip fracture, we present evidence-based components of care both in the hospital and outpatient settings. Preoperatively, clinicians should correct medical abnormalities and consider the appropriateness, timing, and type of surgical repair in the context of the patient's life expectancy and goals of care. Perioperative care should include prophylaxis with antibiotics, chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, and correction of major clinical abnormalities prior to surgery. Pain control, delirium, and pressure ulcer prevention are important inpatient care elements. Multidisciplinary models incorporating these care elements can decrease complications during inpatient stay. Rehabilitation strategies should be tailored to patient needs; early mobilization followed by rehabilitation exercises in institutional, home, and group settings should be considered to maximize restoration of locomotive abilities. Attention to care transitions is necessary and treatment for osteoporosis should be considered. The road to recovery for hip fracture patients is long and most patients may not regain their prefracture functional status. Understanding and anticipating issues that may arise in the older patient with hip fracture, while delivering evidence-based care components, is necessary to maximize patient recovery.     

Use of a “hybrid” locking plate for complex metaphyseal fractures and nonunions about the humerus

Purpose

To review one surgeon's experience with a novel type of “hybrid” locking plate (which has both 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm locking holes) for difficult fractures of the meta-diaphyseal humeral shaft.

Methods

Over a 2-year period, 24 patients who presented with a metaphyseal humeral fracture or nonunion (proximal or distal) were treated surgically by a single surgeon. A “hybrid” locking plate containing 3.5 mm locking holes on one end and 4.5 mm locking holes on the other end (Metaphyseal plate, Synthes, Paoli, Pa) was used in all patients. The selection of this implant was based on fracture location and bone quality. Fractures were operated on through an anterolateral or direct posterior approach. All fractures were secured with a minimum of three 4.5 mm screws on one side of the fracture and three 3.5 mm screws on the other side. All patients were treated with a similar post-operative protocol for early range of shoulder and elbow motion.

Results

Three patients were lost to follow-up. The cohort consisted of 15 women and 6 men with a mean age of 49 years (range 18-78). There were 14 acute fractures and 7 nonunions. Twelve fractures involved the distal metaphyseal segment and 9 involved the proximal metaphyseal segment. Twenty-two patients completed a minimum 6-month clinical and radiographic follow-up and form the basis for this report. All 21 patients healed their fractures or nonunions at a mean of 4.5 months. There were no infections or hardware failures. In every case the “hybrid” nature of the plate design was felt to be advantageous.

Conclusion

This “second generation” metaphyseal locking plate, which affords the surgeon the ability to place a greater number of smaller calibre screws within a short bone segment, while using traditional large fragment screw fixation in the longer segment, is clearly an improvement in plate design. Meta-diaphyseal upper extremity long bones may serve as the most ideal location for this implant.     

Outcome after olecranon fracture repair: Does construct type matter?

Purpose

This study compares clinical and functional outcomes of patients with displaced olecranon fractures treated with either tension band wiring (TBW) or a hook plate construct.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of olecranon fractures operatively treated with either TBW or plate fixation (PF) using a hook plate over a 7-year period. Patient demographics, injury information, and surgical management were recorded. Fractures were classified according to the Mayo system. Measured outcomes included range of elbow motion, time to union, and development of postoperative complications. Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) scores were obtained for all patients. All patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months.

Results

A total of 48 patients were included in this study, 23 treated with TBW and 25 treated with hook PF. Groups did not differ with respect to patient demographics, Mayo fracture type, or duration of follow-up. Patients undergoing PF had less terminal extension than TBW patients (?8.6° ± 7° vs. ?3.5° ± 9.3°, p = 0.036) and a longer time to radiographic union (19 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 6 weeks, p = 0.001). There were no differences in rates of symptomatic hardware, MEPI scores, or other clinical outcomes. Two patients in each group required a second surgery.

Conclusions

TBW and PF of olecranon fractures had similarly excellent functional outcomes in this study. Patients undergoing PF had a longer time to union and slightly worse extension at final follow-up. TBW remains an effective treatment for appropriately selected olecranon fractures and in this cohort outperformed plate osteosynthesis.