How to use Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertility patients

Screening for tubal factor subfertility by means of Chlamydia antibody testing (CAT) was introduced into the initial work-up of subfertile couples several years ago. The results reported, however, are heterogeneous, and no uniformity exists in cut-off levels of titres, or in definitions of tubal factor subfertility. We performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the implications of varying the definitions of tubal pathology and of modifying the cut-off levels on the clinical impact of CAT in predicting tubal factor subfertility. In 227 consecutive patients who attended our fertility clinic, the Chlamydia IgG antibody titre was determined and related to tuboperitoneal abnormalities at laparoscopy as a reference standard. According to received operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a titre of 16 is the optimum cut-off level. Increasing the cut-off level improves specificity and positive likelihood ratio (LR+), at the expense of sensitivity and negative LR (LR-). Changing the definition of tubal factor subfertility from unspecified tuboperitoneal abnormalities into extensive adhesions and/or bilateral distal tubal occlusion improves LR+, LR- and kappa significantly. We conclude that CAT is more accurate in predicting severe distal tubal pathology than unspecified tuboperitoneal abnormalities. Although from a statistical point of view a titre of 16 is the optimum cut-off level, from a clinical point of view 32 or 64 may be preferable, depending on the aim of screening and the inception cohort.      

Anxiety during pregnancy and fetal attachment after in-vitro fertilization conception

The aim of this study was to compare 70 couples who had conceived by in- vitro fertilization (IVF) with 63 matched controls for the prevalence of anxiety and quality of attachment to the baby during pregnancy. Results for mothers showed no group differences using a global measure of anxiety, the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. However, pregnancy-specific measures revealed significantly higher levels of anxiety in IVF mothers about the survival and normality of their unborn babies, about damage to their babies during childbirth and about separating from their babies after birth. When IVF mothers were differentiated according to the number of treatment cycles, more differences in anxiety level were revealed, with most increases occurring in mothers who had experienced two or more treatment cycles. IVF fathers did not differ from controls on the global anxiety measure. No data on pregnancy-specific anxiety were available for fathers. Neither IVF mothers nor IVF fathers differed from controls on measures of attachment to the baby during pregnancy. Results are discussed in the context of the need for researchers to employ differentiated and issue-specific measures to identify concerns that may be unique to IVF couples. Clinical implications regarding the need for psychological support during pregnancy are also discussed.      

Antiphospholipid antibodies and the outcome of pregnancy after the first in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer cycle

Increased antiphospholipid antibody prevalence has been demonstrated by a number of recent studies in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients but the potential effects of antiphospholipid antibodies on the different components of the reproductive process and the consideration of whether to test IVF patients for antiphospholipid antibodies are controversial. The present study was undertaken to investigate the possible association between the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (namely the lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies), among a series of 21 consecutive IVF patients having a clinical spontaneous abortion after their first embryo transfer. As a control group (n=42), the nearest IVF cycle resulting in an ongoing pregnancy before and after each miscarried IVF cycle (i.e. the closest cycles in temporal relationship to the index cycle) was used. One patient (4.8%) in the study group and two women (4.8%) among controls were seropositive for antiphospholipid antibodies. These low and similar seropositivity rates found in the two groups studied lead us to conclude that antiphospholipid antibodies testing in IVF patients should be considered only in those women having repeated failures of implantation/clinical abortion after embryo transfer but not in an infertile general population reaching an IVF programme.