Thrombophilia and Hypercoagulation: Risk Assessment and Screening

The case of a patient who originally had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and subsequently suffered a massive thromboembolic event is presented to highlight the importance of identifying risk factors for and screening of patients with acquired and/or inherited thrombophilic defects. While the prevalence of these hypercoagulable conditions is low, failure to recognize the risks for and consequences of these states can have fatal results. This article presents the case study followed by a review of the current recommendations for the screening of hypercoagulable risks/states and how those results should or should not impact the management of patients with venous thrombotic events     

Consumer Health Resources for Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups

Culturally appropriate health materials for consumers can be difficult to identify. Many federal resources exist to help support minority health initiatives. In addition, national nonprofit organizations and state agencies provide materials to address the health needs of African Americans, Hispanics/Latinos, Asian Americans, American Indians/Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders. This listing offers an initial list of primary resources that librarians can use to address consumer health inquiries from the public.     

Early life predictors of adult leisure-time physical inactivity: prospective findings from the 1958 British Birth Cohort

BackgroundLeisure-time physical inactivity has a high prevalence and associated disease burden. Adult inactivity research ignores earlier life factors from which later life influences can originate. We aimed to establish whether early life factors influence adult inactivity.MethodsThe 1958 British Birth Cohort is a nationwide follow-up study of all births during 1 week in March, 1958. The outcome of the present study was leisure-time inactivity, defined as activity frequency of less than once a week, assessed at ages 33 years, 42 years, and 50 years (n=12 776). Early life factors (birth to 16 years) were categorised into three domains (physical, social, behavioural). We assessed stability of inactivity from 33 years to 50 years and associations with adult inactivity using logistic regression of: factors within domains, the three domains combined (ie, multivariable associations), and allowing for adult factors. Missing values were imputed with multiple imputation chained equations.FindingsAt each adult age, about 32% of participants were inactive (31% at 33 years, 34% at 42 years, and 30% at 50 years). 1189 (9%) were inactive at all three ages. In analysis of the three domains simultaneously, factors related to adult inactivity were: short prepubertal stature, poor hand control or physical coordination, and poor cognition (physical); low class at birth, minimal parental education, poor household amenities, parental divorce, and institutional care (social); and inactivity, average or lower sports aptitude, smoking, and externalising and unsociable behaviours (behavioural). Odds ratios for inactivity at age 33 years ranged from 0·86 per SD increase in cognition (95% CI 0·82–0·91) to 1·41 (1·23–1·61) for average or lower sports aptitude. Associations weakened slightly but were mostly maintained after adjustment for adult covariates. After allowing for adult covariates participants with unskilled manual backgrounds had 23% higher odds of inactivity at 50 years than those from professional or managerial backgrounds.InterpretationOur study, based on self-report, focuses only on leisure-time inactivity. However, to have repeat, prospective data on inactivity spanning several decades in adulthood is rare, and leisure-time inactivity is likely to be amenable to modification. Adult inactivity is only moderately stable, providing opportunities for behaviour change. Factors from early life are associated with adult inactivity, allowing for early identification of groups vulnerable to later inactivity.FundingThis work was supported by the Department of Health Policy Research Programme through the Public Health Research Consortium. The Great Ormond Street and University College London Institute of Child Health was supported in part by the Department of Health's National Institute for Health Biomedical Research Centre.     

Sufentanil versus Fentanyl: Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction with Intrathecal Pain Management

Objectives: This study compared fentanyl vs. sufentanil in intrathecal pain pumps. H1: both reduce patient subjective pain ratings. H2: sufentanil is more effective than fentanyl. H3: overall satisfaction with pain control is greater with sufentanil. Materials/Method: This is an archival study of patients in tertiary pain management (N= 97, mean age = 58.77, standard deviation = 14.88). Pain was measured using the subjective units of discomfort scale. Satisfaction with pain control/relief was measured by asking patients each visit if they are satisfied with pain management and is recorded in a “yes”/ “no” manner. Pain ratings were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance and satisfaction was analyzed with chi square. Results/Discussion: Sufentanil was found to be marginally more effective, but both medications controlled a significant degree of variance in pain reduction over time. A significantly greater number of patients maintained on sufentanil were satisfied with care than patients on fentanyl.     

The Action Research Program: Experiential Learning in Systems-Based Practice for First-Year Medical Students

Problem: Systems-based practice focuses on the organization, financing, and delivery of medical services. The American Association of Medical Colleges has recommended that systems-based practice be incorporated into medical schools’ curricula. However, experiential learning in systems-based practice, including practical strategies to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical care, is often absent from or inconsistently included in medical education. Intervention: A multidisciplinary clinician and nonclinician faculty team partnered with a cardiology outpatient clinic to design a 9-month clerkship for 1st-year medical students focused on systems-based practice, delivery of clinical care, and strategies to improve the quality and efficiency of clinical operations. The clerkship was called the Action Research Program. In 2013–2014, 8 trainees participated in educational seminars, research activities, and 9-week clinic rotations. A qualitative process and outcome evaluation drew on interviews with students, clinic staff, and supervising physicians, as well as students’ detailed field notes. Context: The Action Research Program was developed and implemented at the University of California, San Francisco, an academic medical center in the United States. All educational activities took place at the university's medical school and at the medical center's cardiology outpatient clinic. Outcome: Students reported and demonstrated increased understanding of how care delivery systems work, improved clinical skills, growing confidence in interactions with patients, and appreciation for patients’ experiences. Clinicians reported increased efficiency at the clinic level and improved performance and job satisfaction among medical assistants as a result of their unprecedented mentoring role with students. Some clinicians felt burdened when students shadowed them and asked questions during interactions with patients. Most student-led improvement projects were not fully implemented. Lessons Learned: The Action Research Program is a small pilot project that demonstrates an innovative pairing of experiential and didactic training in systems-based practice. Lessons learned include the need for dedicated time and faculty support for students’ improvement projects, which were the least successful aspect of the program. We recommend that future projects aiming to combine clinical training and quality improvement projects designate distinct blocks of time for trainees to pursue each of these activities independently. In 2014–2015, the University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine incorporated key features of the Action Research Program into the standard curriculum, with plans to build upon this foundation in future curricular innovations.