Day to day reproducibility of electrically inducible ventricular arrhythmias in survivors of acute myocardial infarction

Day to day reproducibility of the response to programmed ventricular stimulation has not been evaluated in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed prospectively on 2 consecutive days in 56 patients on an average of 12 +/- 5 days (range 7 to 29) after an acute myocardial infarction. No patient had a history of documented or suspected sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurring greater than 48 h after infarction. During initial programmed ventricular stimulation, 21 patients had induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (Group I), and 35 patients had induction of either nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or no ventricular tachycardia (Group II). Repeat programmed ventricular stimulation in Group I patients induced sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in 16 of 21 patients (reproducibility 76%); the maximal induced response in the other 5 patients was nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 2 patients and fewer than six repetitive ventricular responses in 3 patients. The day to day reproducibility was significantly higher for inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia of cycle length greater than or equal to 240 ms compared with rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia of cycle length less than 240 ms (100% versus 44%, p less than 0.009) or ventricular fibrillation (100% versus 43%, p less than 0.009). Repeat programmed ventricular stimulation in Group II patients did not induce sustained ventricular arrhythmias in 31 of 35 patients (reproducibility 89%). Thus, in survivors of acute myocardial infarction, inducible slow sustained ventricular tachycardia was a highly reproducible finding, whereas inducibility of rapid sustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation showed a significant day to day variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Platelets modulate the proteolysis of factor VIII:C protein by plasmin

Factor VIII coagulant protein (VIII:C) functions as a critical cofactor with factor IXa, calcium ions, and phospholipid during the activation of factor X. In the course of this reaction, the activity of VIII:C is first increased and then is destroyed by one or more serine proteases that are part of the coagulation sequence. In this study, we have investigated the influence of platelets on the inactivation of VIII:C by plasmin. Platelets were separated from plasma proteins in the presence of granule release inhibitors and were incubated with plasmin and isolated VIII:C or the complex of purified VIII:C/von Willebrand factor (vWF); VIII:C activity and antigen levels were assessed over time. In the presence of platelets, the isolated VIII:C showed an initial increase in VIII:C activity that was not present when platelets were absent, and the VIII:C/vWF showed an increase in VIII:C activity over that seen when platelets were absent. In addition, platelets stabilized VIII:C activity over a one-hour time course when compared with buffer. The VIII:C antigen did not increase and decreased slowly whether platelets were present or absent. Preincubating the platelets with ristocetin, collagen, or plasmin did not alter the results, and experiments using platelets from a patient with severe von Willebrand's disease also showed a pattern similar to that seen with normal platelets. Experiments using fixed platelets or phospholipid vesicles showed that they did not support the activation reaction or delay the inactivation reaction. These studies demonstrate that platelets modulate the activation and inactivation of VIII:C by plasmin, apparently by a mechanism that is independent of the platelet release reaction.     

Care planning for long‐term conditions – a concept mapping

Objective

This article focuses on approaches within clinical practice that seek to actively involve patients with long‐term conditions (LTCs) and how professionals may understand and implement them. Personalized care planning is one such approach, but its current lack of conceptual clarity might have impeded its widespread implementation to date. A variety of overlapping concepts coexist in the literature, which have the potential to impair both clinical and research agendas. The aim of this article is therefore to explore the meaning of the concept of care planning in relation to other overlapping concepts and how this translates into clinical practice implementation.

Methods

Searches were conducted in the Cochrane database for systematic reviews, CINHAL and MEDLINE. A staged approach to conducting the concept mapping was undertaken, by (i) an examination of the literature on care planning in LTCs; (ii) identification of related terms; (iii) locating reviews of those terms. Retrieved articles were subjected to a content analysis, which formed the basis of our concept maps. (iv) We then appraised these against knowledge and experience of the implementation of care planning in clinical practice.

Results and Conclusions

Thirteen articles were retrieved, in which the core importance of patient‐centredness, shared decision making and self‐management was highlighted. Literature searches on these terms retrieved a further 24 articles. Our concept mapping exercise shows that whilst there are common themes across the concepts, the differences between them reflect the context and intended outcomes within clinical practice. We argue that this clarification exercise will allow for further development of both research and clinical implementation agendas.     

Effects of nifedipine on hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction already treated with propranolol

The interaction between nifedipine and propranolol on cardiac hemodynamics and function was investigated in 9 patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function who were undergoing cardiac catheterization for complaints of chest pain. Only 2 patients had angiographic evidence of significant coronary artery disease but no patient had clinical evidence of ischemia during the study. All patients were pre-treated with propranolol, 30 to 320 mg/day (mean +/- standard deviation 210 +/- 122); the propranolol serum level ranged from 43 to 246 ng/ml (mean 203 +/- 62). The administration of nifedipine resulted in a decrease in blood pressure (from 94 +/- 11 to 85 +/- 13 mm Hg, p less than 0.05), increase in heart rate (from 59 +/- 6 to 65 +/- 7 beats/min, p less than 0.05), and an increase in both mean right atrial and mean pulmonary artery wedge pressures (from 8 +/- 3 to 9 +/- 3 mm Hg and from 13 +/- 3 to 14 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively, both p less than 0.05). Cardiac index increased (from 2.3 +/- 0.3 to 2.7 +/- 0.2 liters/min/m2, p less than 0.01). Stroke volume index also increased significantly (from 39 +/- 5 to 43 +/- 6 ml/m2) and systemic vascular resistance decreased (from 1,715 +/- 369 to 1,255 +/- 271 dynes s cm-5, p less than 0.01). No significant change was noted in pulmonary vascular resistance (148 +/- 94 vs 140 +/- 62 dynes s cm-5), LV stroke work index (44 +/- 9 vs 42 +/- 10 g-m/m2), LV end-diastolic pressure (15 +/- 2 vs 16 +/- 2 mm Hg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)