Mechanisms of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae towards beta-lactamase antibiotics

Except for Salmonella spp., all Enterobacteriaceae produce intrinsic chromosomal encoded beta-lactamases which, beside their physiologic role in cell-wall synthesis and natural beta-lactam protection, are responsible for intrinsic resistance of individual species among Enterobacteriaceae. E. coli and Shigella spp. produce a small amount of AmpC beta-lactamases and are susceptible to ampicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotic agents. Enterobacter spp, C. freundii, Serratia spp., M. morganii, P. stuarti and P. rettgeri produce small amounts of inducible AmpC beta-lactamases which are not inhibited by beta-lactamases inhibitor, causing intrinsic resistance to ampicillin, co-amoxiclav and first-generation cephalosporins. K. pneumoniae produces small amounts of SHV-1 beta-lactamases, and K. oxytoca chromosomal K1 beta-lactamase, causing resistance to ampicillin, carbencillin, ticarcillin and attenuated zone of inhibition to piperacillin, compared to piperacillin with tazobactam. They are susceptible to beta-lactamase inhibitors. Whereas P. mirabilis shows a minor chromosomal expression of beta-lactamases, P. vulgaris produces chromosomal beta-lactamases of class A (cefuroximases), causing resistance to ampicillin, ticarcillin, and first- and second-generation cephalosporins. Antibiotics have caused the appearance of acquired or secondary beta-lactamases, with the sole function of protecting bacteria from antibiotics. The production of broad-spectrum beta-lactamases (TEM-1, TEM-2, SHV-1, OXA-1) results in resistance to ampicillin, ticarcillin, first-generation cephalosporins and piperacillin. A high level of beta-lactamases leads to resistance to their inhibitors. The plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) are of increasing concern. Most are mutants of classic TEM- and SHV-beta-lactamases types. Unlike these parent enzymes, ESBLs hydrolyze oxymino-cephalosporins such as cefuroxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftizoxime, ceftazidime, cefpirome and cefepime, aztreonam, as well as penicillins and other cephalosporins, except for cephamycin (cefoxitin and cefotetan). They are inhibited by beta-lactamase inhibitors. AmpC beta-lactamases are chromosomal and inducible in most Enterobacter spp., C. freundii, Serratia spp., M. morganii and Providentia spp. They are resistant to almost all penicillins and cephalosporins, to beta-lactamase inhibitors and aztreonam, and are susceptible to cefepime and carbapenems as well. Plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases have arisen through the transfer of chromosomal genes for the inducible AmpC beta-lactamase onto plasmids. All plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases have similar substrate profiles to the parental enzymes from which they appear to be derived. With one exception, plasmid-mediated AmpCs differ from chromosomal AmpCs in being uninducible. The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) has issued recommendations for ESBL screening and confirmation for isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca. No NCCLS recommendations exist for ESBLs detection and reporting for other organisms or for detecting plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases. High-level expression of AmpC may prevent recognition of an ESBL in species that produce a chromosomally encoded inducible AmpC beta-lactamase. AmpC-inducible species (e. g. Enterobacter spp. and C. freundii) can be recognized by cefoxitin/cefotaxime disk antagonism tests. Since clinical laboratories are first to encounter bacteria with new forms of antibiotic resistance, they need appropriate tools to recognize these bacteria, including trained staff with sufficient time and equipment to follow up important observations. Because bacterial pathogenes are constantly changing, training must be an ongoing process.     

Evaluation and selection of candidates for renal transplantation at the Clinical Hospital Center in Rijeka

On December 31, 2001, 2486 patients with terminal renal failure received dialysis treatment in Croatia. Only one third of the patients are registered on the national waiting list for cadaveric kidney transplant. In most of the others, transplantation is impossible because of comorbidity. This is mainly due to the steadily growing age of the dialytic population and therefore a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Still, evaluation of the potential recipients of cadaveric kidney transplant, registered on the waiting list, often reveals contraindications for transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and type of contraindications in transplant candidates, found during immediate preoperative evaluation. Analysis of these data should help in determining how contraindications can be early detected and prevented. Before registering onto the national waiting list transplant candidates need to be thoroughly investigated including detailed history, physical examination, routine diagnostic procedures and additional examinations, if needed, to exclude or evaluate the possibly existing contraindications for transplantation. During the period from January 1997 until June 2002, 145 potential recipients from the national waiting list were referred to the Rijeka University Hospital Center and evaluated for kidney transplantation. Eighty-eight patients underwent transplantation. Preoperative evaluation revealed contraindications for transplantation in 52 (35.9%) candidates. Twenty-two (15.2%) patients had a positive cross-match with donor lymphocytes, 6 (4.1%) patients refused transplantation, and in 24 (16.6%) patients serious comorbidity was the reason for not being accepted for transplantation and for their withdrawal from the national waiting list. Comorbidity was mainly due to cardiovascular disease (12 patients--8.3%) and infection (8 patients--5.5%). These data show a high incidence of contraindications found during the immediate preoperative evaluation of potential kidney recipients. It was the case in more than one third of patients. During the evaluation of potential candidates for kidney transplantation special attention should be addressed to the presence of cardiovascular morbidity and infection. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease, cardiac status and/or cerebrovascular disease should be evaluated. Measures used to treat or reduce the development of complications include an optimal control of blood pressure, serum phosphate, hyperparathyroidism, dyslipidemia, and renal anemia. The sites of infection must be treated and eradicated, because immunosuppressive treatment is a threat to the transplant recipient's life. The second most common cause of refusal of potential candidates was a positive cross-match with donor lymphocytes. Sensitization to human leukocyte antigens can be prevented by the avoiding of blood transfusions and use of erythopoietin in treating renal anemia. To minimize the morbidity and mortality, the potential kidney recipients should undergo rigorous selection and thorough evaluation before including them into the waiting list for kidney transplantation. Afterwards, regular examinations are obligatory to reveal contraindications, proceed to medical interventions and treat concomitant diseases in time, which can influence the patient's survival. In case that contraindications for transplantation arise, the patient must be temporarily or definitely removed from the waiting list.     

Rapid diagnosis of parasitic diseases: current scenario and future needs

Background

Parasitic diseases are one of the world's most devastating and prevalent infections, causing millions of morbidities and mortalities annually. In the past, many of these infections have been linked predominantly to tropical or subtropical areas. Nowadays, however, climatic and vector ecology changes, a significant increase in international travel, armed conflicts, and migration of humans and animals have influenced the transmission of some parasitic diseases from ‘book pages’ to reality in developed countries. It has also been noted that many patients who have never travelled to endemic areas suffer from blood-borne infections caused by protozoa. In the light of existing knowledge, this new trend can be explained by the fact that in the process of migration a large number of asymptomatic carriers become a part of the blood bank donor and transplant donor populations. Accurate and rapid diagnosis represents the crucial weapon in the fight against parasitic infections.