HP 818: A centrally acting analgesic with neuroleptic properties

HP 818 (1-benzoyl-6-fluoro-3-(1-methyl-4-piperidinyl)-1H-indazole) exhibits the profile of a potent nonnarcotic analgesic with neuroleptic properties. HP 818 blocks the effects of chemical (phenylquinone), pressure (tail clip), and radiant heat (tail flick) painful stimuli in mice (ED₅₀ values of 0.3, 1.2, and 4.1 mg/kg s.c., respectively). This compound displays antinociceptive activity by the subcutaneous, oral, and intravenous routes of administration. It is also effective in the shock titration assay in squirrel monkeys and in a model of surgically induced pain. The rank order of potency of HP 818 and several other standard compounds in these tests for analgesia was Innovar > fentanyl > HP 818 > codeine > droperidol. In addition to its antinociceptive effects, HP 818 possesses neuroleptic properties. It is active in the climbing mouse, pole climb avoidance, and intracranial self-stimulation assays (ED₅₀ values of 1.8, 1.7, and 2.5 mg/kg i.p., respectively). Moreover, HP 818 inhibits amphetamine- and apomorphine-induced stereotypy, indicative of D₂-dopaminergic blocking properties. HP 818, unlike typical neuroleptic agents, does not induce supersensitivity to the effects of apomorphine when administered chronically in mice. In contrast to the clinical standard neuroleptanalgesic Innovar, HP 818 (1.0–3.0 mg/kg i.v.) produces no significant cardiovascular or respiratory changes in the anesthetized dog. Thus, HP 818 is potentially an effective presurgical medication due to its nonnarcotic analgesic activity and sedative neuroleptic effects, along with its lack of limiting cardiorespiratory side effects.     

Mental object rotation in Parkinson's disease.

Deficits in visual-spatial ability can be associated with Parkinson's disease (PD), and there are several possible reasons for these deficits. Dysfunction in frontal-striatal and/or frontal-parietal systems, associated with dopamine deficiency, might disrupt cognitive processes either supporting (e.g., working memory) or subserving visual-spatial computations. The goal of this study was to assess visual-spatial orientation ability in individuals with PD using the Mental Rotations Test (MRT), along with other measures of cognitive function. Non-demented men with PD were significantly less accurate on this test than matched control men. In contrast, women with PD performed similarly to matched control women, but both groups of women did not perform much better than chance. Further, mental rotation accuracy in men correlated with their executive skills involving mental processing and psychomotor speed. In women with PD, however, mental rotation accuracy correlated negatively with verbal memory, indicating that higher mental rotation performance was associated with lower ability in verbal memory. These results indicate that PD is associated with visual-spatial orientation deficits in men. Women with PD and control women both performed poorly on the MRT, possibly reflecting a floor effect. Although men and women with PD appear to engage different cognitive processes in this task, the reason for the sex difference remains to be elucidated.     

Improving Femoral Bone Density Measurements

Femoral bone density measurements are clinically important because of their strong relationship with hip fracture. However, current densitometers have not improved upon femoral densitometry since the introduction of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems. Recently, several advances in DXA measurement of the proximal femur have been proposed by various published studies. These advances can be added to existing DXA systems, while maintaining the conventional femoral regions of interest. Both upper neck bone mineral density (BMD) and hip axis length have been reported to be associated with hip fractures. With newer technology that enables a rapid assessment of both hips, bilateral femur measurements are now clinically practical and are of importance in those with T-scores approaching, yet not reaching, diagnostic or therapeutic thresholds. Bilateral femur measurements also reduce precision error compared to a single femur measurement, yielding precision errors less than observed at the spine. With this decrease in precision error, monitoring of bone changes is now possible at the femur with the utility comparable to the spine.