The effect of midazolam on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials

Objective. To quantify the effect of an induction dose of midazolam on median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.Methods. We studied 10 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. After an induction dose of intravenous midazolam was given, MNEPs were collected for ten minutes. After ten minutes the patients were intubated and their anesthetic was supplemented with 0.5% isoflurane, narcotic, and N₂O.Results. We found a clinically significant decrease in amplitude and an insignificant delay in latency.Conclusion. When midazolam is used as an anesthetic induction agent, a decrease in amplitude can be expected.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide in women with metastatic breast cancer

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prolonged oral etoposide chemotherapy were investigated in 15 women with metastatic breast cancer who received oral etoposide 100 mg as a single daily dose for up to 15 days. There was considerable interpatient variability in the day 1 pharmacokinetic parameters: area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) (0–24 h) 1.95±0.87 mg/ml per min (mean ± SD), apparent oral clearance 60.9±21.7 ml/min per 1.73 m², peak plasma concentration 5.6±2.5 g/ml, time to peak concentration 73±35 min and half-life 220±83 min. However, intrapatient variability in systemic exposure to etoposide was much less with repeated doses. The intrapatient coefficient of variation (CV) of AUC for day 8 relative to day 1 was 20% and for day 15 relative to day 1 was 15%, compared to the day 1 interpatient CV of 45%. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity. Day 1 pharmacokinetic parameters were related to the percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count using the sigmoidal E_max equation. A good fit was found between day 1 AUC and neutrophil toxicity (R ²=0.77). All patients who had a day 1 AUC>2.0 mg/ml per min had WHO grade III or IV neutropenia. The predictive performance of the models for neutrophil toxicity was better for AUC (percentage mean predictive error 5%, percentage root mean square error 18.1%) than apparent oral clearance, peak plasma concentration, or daily dose (mg/m²). A limited sampling strategy was developed to predict AUC using a linear regression model incorporating a patient effect. Data sets were divided into training and test sets. The AUC could be estimated using a model utilizing plasma etoposide concentration at only two time points, 4 h and 6 h after oral dosing (R ²=98.9%). The equation AUC_pr=–0.376+0.631×C_4h+0.336×C_6h was validated on the test set with a relative mean predictive error of –0.88% and relative root mean square error of 6.4%. These results suggest monitoring of AUC to predict subsequent myelosuppression as a strategy for future trials with oral etoposide.Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Locked Bag 1, A'Beckett St, Melbourne 3000, Australia     

Current management of AIDS related non Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Non Hodgkin’s lymphoma is the AIDS defining illness in 3-3.5% of patients and is increasing in incidence as the survival of HIV infected people improves. The incidence of these intermediate/high grade B cell malignancies is sixty times higher than in the general population. The most important prognostic factors are a CD4 positive lymphocyte count of <100 cells/mm3, a prior AIDS defining diagnosis, an ECOG performance status >2 and primary cerebral origin. Patients with any of these factors are most likely to benefit from palliative rather than radical treatment. Good prognosis patients have a 30-40% chance of cure from their lymphoma with carefully administered intensive chemotherapy.     

Double β-lactam regimen compared to an aminoglycoside/β-lactam regimen as empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients

In a prospective, randomized trial, 205 febrile episodes in granulocytopenic cancer patients were treated with ceftazidime with or without tobramycin (C±T), both agents being administered only if the initial granulocyte count was below 200/l, or ceftazidime plus piperacillin (C+P). The overall response rate was 71% (39 of 60 for C±T and 45 of 58 for C+P). Logistic regression analyses documented no evidence of a significant difference between the two regimens in overall treatment effect after accounting for the linear effects of potentially important variables, such as infection type and granulocyte count. Although the response rates for the subgroup of patients with bacteremias was better with the C+P regimen (P=0.06), there was no difference in response for patients with bacteremia and profound (<100/gml) sustained granulocytopenia. The double -lactam combination demonstrated in vitro synergism in 73%; antagonism was not seen. Both regimens produced execllent serum bactericidal levels (C±T geometric mean peak 1:170; C+P peak 1:137) against gram-negative but not gram-positive pathogens (1:4; 1:7 respectively) that had caused bacteremia. Emergence of resistance and significant coagulopathy and/or bleeding did not occur during therapy. Antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity was noted in 7 of 95 trials in the C+P and in 6 of 89 trials in the C±T group (P=0.19). The incidence of secondary infections in patients with profound (<100/l) sustained granulocytopenia was lower in the C±T group (P=0.04). Alimentary canal anaerobic flora preservation with C±T, and suppression with C+P, was demonstrated. These results suggest that these regimens are of similar effectiveness and neigher is associated with major toxicity.     

Review: Clinical Variability and Genetic Heterogeneity in Multiple Epiphyseal Dysplasia

This review reports on multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED), first described clinically in the early part of the 20th century. Over 50 years later, we are now beginning to unravel the mystery behind the genetic mutations involved in triggering the changes in cartilage observed in this condition. In the past decade considerable progress has been made in identifying the underlying genetic defect in some forms of MED. Understanding the precise effect that these molecular changes have on the integrity of the cartilage extracellular matrix will lead the way in identifying the complex disease pathophysiology that defines MED. In addition, a greater understanding of the role and interactions of specific cartilage molecules may reveal the basis of more widespread cartilage disorders such as osteoarthritis.     

Genetic, environmental, and gender effects on individual differences in toddler expressive language.

In this article, the authors examined the genetic and environmental factors influencing expressive language development in a sample of 386 toddler twin pairs participating in the Wisconsin Twin Project. Expressive language was assessed using 2 measures from the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories-Short Form: Total Vocabulary and Two-Word Combination Use (L. Fenson et al., 2000). A sex-limitation structural equation model estimated the contribution of genetics, shared environment, and nonshared environment to individual variation. For vocabulary, heritability was higher for boys than for girls (20% vs. 8%). For word combination use, heritability was higher for girls (28% vs. 10%). However, the majority of individual variation in both boys and girls could be attributed to shared environment (54%-78%).     

Can we identify the poorest quality of life? Assessing the importance of quality of life using the WHOQOL-100

In this study, WHOQOL survey data obtained from 4802 sick and well participants in 15 countries were used to investigate the relationship between judgements about different dimensions of quality of life (QOL) (core scores) and the importance attributed to them. As a theoretical framework, we applied the WHOQOL Group's (1995) definition of QOL which indicates that those who report the very poorest QOL will be least likely to have met their own '...goals, expectations, standards and concerns'. Those with the poorest QOL would therefore be expected to show the biggest difference between core and importance scores, and therefore be distinguishable from respondents whose QOL was poor, better or best. The main effects from overall analyses confirmed that those reporting the largest negative differences tended to report the poorest QOL and also attached a high degree of importance to these dimensions. Evidence for a decreasing differential across the four groups (poorest to best) was confirmed for the majority (18) of facets. However facet level analyses comparing groups with different levels of QOL showed that only five facets distinguished those with the poorest QOL from those whose QOL was poor, so the theory is not well supported. Furthermore the contribution of core-importance facet differences reduced the overall prediction of QOL, when compared with a regression of core scores alone. Importance information about specific facets may have limited potential to be used alongside the main instrument to identify areas of the poorest QOL for clinical or social action.     

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement in Radiation Oncology: Interpretation of Individual Scores and Change over Time in Clinical Practice

Tools for measuring patients’ perceived health and quality of life, such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inform clinical decisions for patients requiring radiation therapy. However, there may be inconsistencies in how patients interpret and respond to PROMs due to cultural, environmental, personal, or experiential factors. Differential item functioning (DIF) and response shift (RS) refer to differences in the meaning of PROMs between patients or over time (respectively). DIF and RS can threaten the accurate interpretation and use of PROMs, potentially resulting in erroneous conclusions about effectiveness, and flawed individual-level clinical decision-making. Given the empirical evidence of DIF and RS, we aim to review clinical implications and solutions for addressing DIF and RS by providing vignettes from collaborative examinations with workshop participants, as well as the literature. By making these methodological concepts accessible and relevant, for practice, clinicians may feel more confident to ask clarifying questions of patients when PROM scores and the contextual patient information do not align. PROM scores need to be interpreted via dialogue with the patient to avoid misinterpretation due to DIF and RS, which could diminish patient–clinician communication and impede shared decision-making. This work is part of an interdisciplinary knowledge translation initiative focused on the interpretation of PROM scores by clinically-oriented audiences.