Effect of exposure parameters and gutta-percha cone size on fracture-like artifacts in endodontically treated teeth on cone-beam computed tomography images

Oral Radiology - To ascertain the effects of exposure parameters (tube current and tube voltage) and the gutta-percha cone (GPC) size on root fracture-like artifacts obtained with cone-beam...     

Natural variation in a polyamine transporter determines paraquat tolerance in Arabidopsis

Polyamines (PAs) are ubiquitous, polycationic compounds that are essential for the growth and survival of all organisms. Although the PA-uptake system plays a key role in mammalian cancer and in plant survival, the underlying molecular mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we identified an Arabidopsis L-type amino acid transporter (LAT) family transporter, named RMV1 (resistant to methyl viologen 1), responsible for uptake of PA and its analog paraquat (PQ). The natural variation in PQ tolerance was determined in 22 Arabidopsis thaliana accessions based on the polymorphic variation of RMV1. An RMV1-GFP fusion protein localized to the plasma membrane in transformed cells. The Arabidopsis rmv1 mutant was highly resistant to PQ because of the reduction of PQ uptake activity. Uptake studies indicated that RMV1 mediates proton gradient-driven PQ transport. RMV1 overexpressing plants were hypersensitive to PA and PQ and showed elevated PA/PQ uptake activity, supporting the notion that PQ enters plant cells via a carrier system that inherently functions in PA transport. Furthermore, we demonstrated that polymorphic variation in RMV1 controls PA/PQ uptake activity. Our identification of a molecular entity for PA/PQ uptake and sensitivity provides an important clue for our understanding of the mechanism and biological significance of PA uptake.     

Immunohistochemical expression of podoplanin in so-called hard α-keratin-expressing tumors, including calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, craniopharyngioma, and pilomatrixoma

Podoplanin, a transmembrane sialomucin-like glycoprotein, is a specific marker of lymphatic vessels, and its expression is also considered to be associated with tumor invasion and tooth development. In this study, we examined the expression of podoplanin in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor (CCOT) in comparison with that in other so-called hard α-keratin-expressing tumors such as craniopharyngioma (CP) and pilomatrixoma (PM). Immunohistochemical staining for podoplanin was carried out using surgical specimens of 15 CCOTs of the jaw, 19 CPs of the pituitary gland, and 15 PMs of the skin. Positivity for hard α-keratin was evident in ghost, shadow and transitional cells in all of these tumors (100%). The podoplanin expression in CCOTs was evident in the periphery of ameloblastoma-like epithelium (86.6%) and the epithelial cells adjacent to ghost cells (60%). On the other hand, in adamantinomatous-type CPs, podoplanin expression was observed in epithelial components corresponding to the stratum intermedium (100%), but not in the periphery of ameloblastoma-like epithelium (0%). In squamous-type CPs podoplanin was expressed in basal cells (100%), but all of the PMs were podoplanin-negative (0%). In the periphery of the ameloblastoma-like epithelium or basophilic cell layer, podoplanin was expressed more strongly in CCOTs than in CPs or PMs. These findings suggest that the expression of podoplanin in CCOTs may reflect rapid turnover of cytoskeletal filaments and local invasiveness.     

A method to maintain the thickness of the mouthguard after the vacuum forming process: changes of the holding conditions of the mouthguard sheet

The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the thickness of the mouthguard sheet according to the holding conditions during heating. The material used in this study was Sports Mouthguard (3.8 mm thickness), and two holding conditions of the sheet were undertaken: one was the condition that the sheet was held all around the periphery and the other was that the sheet was held at only four points. The sheets were formed using a vacuum former when the sheets were heated until they hung 2.0 cm from the baseline. We measured the thickness of each part of the mouthguard and calculated the ratio of changes in the thickness. The difference in the thickness by the holding conditions at the area of the sheet that fitted over the anterior teeth, palate, and posterior teeth was analyzed by the paired t-test. The results showed that the thickness of the sheet differed statistically and significantly at the regions of the sheet that fitted over the anterior teeth and posterior teeth (P < 0.01) and the palate (P < 0.05) according to the holding conditions of the sheet. The thickness of the condition that the sheet was held all around the periphery was thinner than that of the condition that the sheet was held at only four points. These results suggested that the thickness of the sheet was maintained by holding the sheet only at four points, and this new method could be an effective way to maintain the thickness of the mouthguard in clinical use.