Identifying Risk Drinking in Expectant Fathers

Abstract: Background: Identification of risk drinking in expectant fathers may be helpful as an important part of efforts to minimize maternal alcohol use, and as an opportunity to inform them about a problematic practice during a critical developmental stage for the couple. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the T‐ACE screening questionnaire, which asks about t olerance to alcohol, being a nnoyed by other's comments about drinking, attempts to c ut down, and having a drink first thing in the morning (“ e ye‐opener”), in the male partners of pregnant women who themselves were T‐ACE positive. Methods: Two hundred fifty‐four male partners were asked to complete the T‐ACE embedded in a health survey, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), and other questions about their alcohol use in the past 30 days when their pregnant partners had a median gestation of 11.5 weeks (T₁). After delivery, male partners again completed the T‐ACE and quantity‐frequency questions (T₂). The predictive ability of the T‐ACE and AUDIT was compared, using risk drinking (>4 drinks/day or >14 drinks/week) as the criterion standard. Results: A substantial minority of male partners had risk drinking, 31 percent at T₁ and 25 percent at T₂. Although the AUDIT was better than the T‐ACE as an independent predictor of risk drinking, the latter was most accurate when the tolerance threshold exceeded 2 drinks, the same established for pregnant women. The sensitivity (T₁ = 84.6%, T₂ = 82.8%) and specificity (T₁ = 43.8%, T₂ = 51.1%) of the T‐ACE at this threshold compared favorably with those of the AUDIT at the standard cut point of 8. Conclusions: The T‐ACE may be a practical way for clinicians to identify risk drinking in both pregnant women and expectant fathers. (BIRTH 33:2 June 2006)     

Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay kit for estrogen receptor measurement--report II

We present evidence to show that monoclonal antibodies to estrogen receptors (ER) in solid phase recognize the secondary estrogen binding sites with moderate to low affinity for estradiol (E2). An excellent quantitative agreement was found in five cytosols between the ER values obtained by the enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA) and the amount of secondary estrogen binding sites measured by the assay involving dextran-coated charcoal (Clin Chem 1986;32:1496). The immunoreactive protein recognized by the antibody-coated beads, when allowed to react with ER(+) cytosols, is shown to bind [3H]estradiol only when the ligand concentration exceeds 8 nmol/L. Further biochemical and functional characterization of the immunoreactive protein is required to establish similarities/dissimilarities between this protein, high-affinity Type I ER sites, and the secondary sites such as Type II sites.     

Die klassifikatorische und pr?diktive Qualit?t des Merkmals “suicide intent” bei Parasuiziden Eine clusteranalytische Untersuchung Eine clusteranalytische Untersuchung

In einer clusteranalytischen Untersuchung mit 137 Patienten, die einen Parasuizid verübt hatten, wurden 6 Subgruppen unter Berücksichtigung der Klassifikationsvariable “suicide intent” isoliert. Es wurde die Hypothese geprüft, dass sich sowohl die Motivstrukturen als auch die Raten an wiederholten Parasuiziden in Abh?ngigkeit der Clusterl?sung bedeutsam voneinander unterscheiden. Die Ergebnisse unterstützen die Annahme einer zunehmenden Ausdifferenzierung der interpersonell orientierten Motivstrukturen mit sinkendem bzw. einer Einengung der Motivstruktur auf den Todeswunsch mit steigendem “suicide intent”. Es wurden folgende Subgruppen differenziert: eine Suizid-Hochrisikogruppe mit ausschlie?licher Todesintention und -motivation, 2 moderate Suizid-Risikogruppen mit hoher Todesintention und leichten Tendenzen zu interpersoneller Motivation, eine Subgruppe, gekennzeichnet durch eine manipulativ/strategisch orientierte Motivstruktur und auff?llig h?ufigen Parasuizidwiederholungen, eine Subgruppe mit vorrangig appellativ orientierten Motiven, Kontrollverlust und vergleichsweise seltenen Parasuizidwiederholungen und eine Subgruppe mit ambivalenter Motivstruktur (interpersonell und todesorientiert).